Survival Outcomes in Stage IV Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine: A Retrospective Analysis in Veteran Patients

A. Kunthur, E. Siegel, R. Govindarajan
{"title":"Survival Outcomes in Stage IV Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine: A Retrospective Analysis in Veteran Patients","authors":"A. Kunthur, E. Siegel, R. Govindarajan","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2020.06.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi) is the standard regimen used to treat stage IV urothelial bladder\ncancers. However, most of the bladder cancer patients are older, with poor performance status and renal\ndysfunction, and are not eligible for cisplatin-containing regimens. There are no randomized studies\ncomparing gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi).\nMethods: We identified stage IV bladder cancer patients treated within the Veterans Health Administration\n(VHA), healthcare system between January 2000 and December 2010 from Veterans Affairs Central Cancer\nRegistry (VACCR). Overall survival (OS) was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves and tested for the\nsignificance of the treatment-arm difference using the log-rank test.\nResults: There were 196 patients with stage IV bladder cancer, out of which 78 patients were treated with\nGC and 118 patients treated with GCi. The median OS for all patients was 12.5 months a 95% confidence\ninterval (CI) of 10.0-14.6 months. The median OS for patients treated with GC was 13.4 months (95% CI\n9.8-17.5 months), and that of the patients treated with GCi was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.3-14.9 months). Cox\nregression revealed equal group mortality rates, with GC having a (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.96 (CI 0.72-1.27;\nP= 0.81)) compared to GCi.\nConclusion: Our study is the largest comparing GC and GCi in stage IV urothelial bladder cancer patients.\nIt showed that there is no difference in OS in patients treated with GC and GCi.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2020.06.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi) is the standard regimen used to treat stage IV urothelial bladder cancers. However, most of the bladder cancer patients are older, with poor performance status and renal dysfunction, and are not eligible for cisplatin-containing regimens. There are no randomized studies comparing gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) and gemcitabine/cisplatin (GCi). Methods: We identified stage IV bladder cancer patients treated within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), healthcare system between January 2000 and December 2010 from Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR). Overall survival (OS) was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves and tested for the significance of the treatment-arm difference using the log-rank test. Results: There were 196 patients with stage IV bladder cancer, out of which 78 patients were treated with GC and 118 patients treated with GCi. The median OS for all patients was 12.5 months a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 10.0-14.6 months. The median OS for patients treated with GC was 13.4 months (95% CI 9.8-17.5 months), and that of the patients treated with GCi was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.3-14.9 months). Cox regression revealed equal group mortality rates, with GC having a (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.96 (CI 0.72-1.27; P= 0.81)) compared to GCi. Conclusion: Our study is the largest comparing GC and GCi in stage IV urothelial bladder cancer patients. It showed that there is no difference in OS in patients treated with GC and GCi.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺铂/吉西他滨与卡铂/吉西他滨治疗的IV期膀胱癌患者的生存结局:对退伍军人患者的回顾性分析
目的:吉西他滨/顺铂(GCi)是治疗IV期尿路上皮性膀胱癌的标准方案。然而,大多数膀胱癌患者年龄较大,表现不佳,肾功能不全,不适合使用含顺铂的方案。没有比较吉西他滨/卡铂(GC)和吉西他滨/顺铂(GCi)的随机研究。方法:我们从退伍军人事务中心癌症登记处(VACCR)中筛选2000年1月至2010年12月在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医疗保健系统中接受治疗的IV期膀胱癌患者。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线可视化总生存期(OS),并使用log-rank检验检验治疗组差异的显著性。结果:IV期膀胱癌196例,其中gc组78例,GCi组118例。所有患者的中位OS为12.5个月,95%可信区间(CI)为10.0-14.6个月。GC组患者的中位OS为13.4个月(95% CI9.8 ~ 17.5个月),GCi组患者的中位OS为11.7个月(95% CI 9.3 ~ 14.9个月)。协回归显示各组死亡率相等,与GCi相比,GC的风险比(HR)为0.96 (CI 0.72-1.27;P= 0.81)。结论:我们的研究是比较IV期尿路上皮性膀胱癌患者GC和GCi的最大研究。结果表明,GC和GCi治疗的OS无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disseminated Thymic Carcinoma: Case Report and Discussion on Problems of Treatment What is the Obstetric Outcome with a Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ) for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia? Effects of DSPP and MMP20 Silencing on Key Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells Multifaceted Networking of The Orphan Receptor Estrogen-Related Receptor Β in Breast Cancer Progression Current CT and MRI Applications in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1