Model Predictive Control of Melt Pool Size for the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Under Process Uncertainty

Zhimin Xi
{"title":"Model Predictive Control of Melt Pool Size for the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Under Process Uncertainty","authors":"Zhimin Xi","doi":"10.1115/1.4051746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is one of popular additive manufacturing techniques for building metal parts through the layer-by-layer melting and solidification process. To date, there are plenty of successful product prototypes manufactured by the LPBF process. However, the lack of confidence in its quality and long-term reliability could be one of the major reasons prevent the LPBF process from being widely adopted in industry. The existing LPBF process is an open loop control system with some in situ monitoring capability. Hence, manufacturing quality and long-term reliability of the part cannot be guaranteed if there is any disturbance during the process. Such limitation can be overcome if a feedback control system can be implemented. This article studies the control effectiveness of the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and the model predictive control (MPC) for the LPBF process based on a physics-based machine learning model. The control objective is to maintain the melt pool width and depth at required level under process uncertainties from the powder and laser. A sampling-based dynamic control window approach is further proposed for MPC as a practical approach to approximate the optimal control actions within limited time constraint. Control effectiveness, pros, and cons of the PID control and the MPC for the LPBF process are investigated and compared through various control scenarios. It is demonstrated that the MPC is more effective than the PID control under the same conditions, but the MPC demands a valid digit twin of the LPBF process.","PeriodicalId":44694,"journal":{"name":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","volume":"1998 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process is one of popular additive manufacturing techniques for building metal parts through the layer-by-layer melting and solidification process. To date, there are plenty of successful product prototypes manufactured by the LPBF process. However, the lack of confidence in its quality and long-term reliability could be one of the major reasons prevent the LPBF process from being widely adopted in industry. The existing LPBF process is an open loop control system with some in situ monitoring capability. Hence, manufacturing quality and long-term reliability of the part cannot be guaranteed if there is any disturbance during the process. Such limitation can be overcome if a feedback control system can be implemented. This article studies the control effectiveness of the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control and the model predictive control (MPC) for the LPBF process based on a physics-based machine learning model. The control objective is to maintain the melt pool width and depth at required level under process uncertainties from the powder and laser. A sampling-based dynamic control window approach is further proposed for MPC as a practical approach to approximate the optimal control actions within limited time constraint. Control effectiveness, pros, and cons of the PID control and the MPC for the LPBF process are investigated and compared through various control scenarios. It is demonstrated that the MPC is more effective than the PID control under the same conditions, but the MPC demands a valid digit twin of the LPBF process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工艺不确定条件下激光粉末床熔化过程熔池尺寸的模型预测控制
激光粉末床熔融(LPBF)是一种流行的增材制造技术,通过逐层熔化和凝固的过程来制造金属零件。到目前为止,已经有很多成功的产品原型是由LPBF工艺制造的。然而,对其质量和长期可靠性缺乏信心可能是阻碍LPBF工艺在工业中广泛采用的主要原因之一。现有的LPBF过程是一个开环控制系统,具有一定的现场监测能力。因此,如果在加工过程中出现任何扰动,则无法保证零件的制造质量和长期可靠性。如果可以实施反馈控制系统,则可以克服这种限制。本文研究了基于物理的机器学习模型的比例-积分-导数(PID)控制和模型预测控制(MPC)对LPBF过程的控制效果。控制目标是在粉末和激光的工艺不确定性下保持熔池宽度和深度在所需水平。进一步提出了基于采样的MPC动态控制窗口方法,作为在有限时间约束下逼近最优控制动作的实用方法。通过各种控制方案,对LPBF过程的PID控制和MPC的控制效果、优缺点进行了研究和比较。结果表明,在相同条件下,MPC控制比PID控制更有效,但MPC需要LPBF过程的有效数字孪生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Verification and Validation of Rotating Machinery Using Digital Twin Risk Approach Based On the Fram Model for Vessel Traffic Management A Fault Detection Framework Based On Data-driven Digital Shadows Domain Adaptation Of Population-Based Of Bolted Joint Structures For Loss Detection Of Tightening Torque Human-Comfort Evaluation for A Patient-Transfer Robot through A Human-Robot Mechanical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1