Rationalization of Flares at Terminal Island

Tehsin Akhtar, Bablu Kumar Maiti
{"title":"Rationalization of Flares at Terminal Island","authors":"Tehsin Akhtar, Bablu Kumar Maiti","doi":"10.2118/207414-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study aims to assess potential opportunities for optimizing the number of flares operated by COMPANY at the Terminal Island with oil and gas processing, storage and export facilities, while considering ongoing and future developments on the island and possible integration with flare network of other downstream Company. The different flare systems cater to flaring requirements of HP, MP and LP systems in oil and gas processing plants at the island. The fundamental drivers for flare systems rationalization study are disadvantages associated with greater number of flares such as:\n More plot area usage for flares at expense of industrial expansion Increased HSE risks in terms of thermal radiation and dispersion of toxic gases More fuel gas consumption as purge and pilot gas Higher operational and maintenance costs\n In this study, existing flares at Terminal Island were studied and options were developed for each flare system with the aim of rationalizing the number of flares. These options included demolition of flares, diversion and redistribution of respective flare loads to other flares. Relocation of flares to offshore platforms / reclaimed areas in sea and replacement of elevated flare with enclosed ground flare, which has negligible thermal radiation was also considered.\n The rationalization options developed for each flare system were evaluated on the basis of factors such as recovered sterile area, reduction in purge gas (Hydrocarbon and Nitrogen) and pilot gas consumption, maintenance cost, operation cost, number of flares and estimated investment as CAPEX (for modification scope). The current and future flare loads were taken into account while developing these options. The flare design capacities, available capacities for accommodating additional flare loads, sterile area freed along with minimization of associated dispersion and thermal radiation effects at ground level after demolition of flares were also considered for generation of suitable rationalization options.\n A simplified and optimized flaring network at Terminal Island operated by COMPANY was developed by reducing the number of flares based on techno-economic screening, while safeguarding the operational and safety requirements. As concluded from the study, eight (8) nos. of flares occupying significant sterile radii can be demolished out of total fourteen (14) nos. of existing flares.\n The sterile area recovered (approximately 77,000 m2) as result of flares rationalization is of great value and importance for building new facilities. The land recovered can be used for future developmental projects on the island instead of opting for land reclamation. In addition, COMPANY's objectives to reduce environmental impact, associated HSE risks and thermal radiation intensity at surrounding areas / facilities will also be achieved.","PeriodicalId":11069,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207414-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to assess potential opportunities for optimizing the number of flares operated by COMPANY at the Terminal Island with oil and gas processing, storage and export facilities, while considering ongoing and future developments on the island and possible integration with flare network of other downstream Company. The different flare systems cater to flaring requirements of HP, MP and LP systems in oil and gas processing plants at the island. The fundamental drivers for flare systems rationalization study are disadvantages associated with greater number of flares such as: More plot area usage for flares at expense of industrial expansion Increased HSE risks in terms of thermal radiation and dispersion of toxic gases More fuel gas consumption as purge and pilot gas Higher operational and maintenance costs In this study, existing flares at Terminal Island were studied and options were developed for each flare system with the aim of rationalizing the number of flares. These options included demolition of flares, diversion and redistribution of respective flare loads to other flares. Relocation of flares to offshore platforms / reclaimed areas in sea and replacement of elevated flare with enclosed ground flare, which has negligible thermal radiation was also considered. The rationalization options developed for each flare system were evaluated on the basis of factors such as recovered sterile area, reduction in purge gas (Hydrocarbon and Nitrogen) and pilot gas consumption, maintenance cost, operation cost, number of flares and estimated investment as CAPEX (for modification scope). The current and future flare loads were taken into account while developing these options. The flare design capacities, available capacities for accommodating additional flare loads, sterile area freed along with minimization of associated dispersion and thermal radiation effects at ground level after demolition of flares were also considered for generation of suitable rationalization options. A simplified and optimized flaring network at Terminal Island operated by COMPANY was developed by reducing the number of flares based on techno-economic screening, while safeguarding the operational and safety requirements. As concluded from the study, eight (8) nos. of flares occupying significant sterile radii can be demolished out of total fourteen (14) nos. of existing flares. The sterile area recovered (approximately 77,000 m2) as result of flares rationalization is of great value and importance for building new facilities. The land recovered can be used for future developmental projects on the island instead of opting for land reclamation. In addition, COMPANY's objectives to reduce environmental impact, associated HSE risks and thermal radiation intensity at surrounding areas / facilities will also be achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
码头岛照明弹的合理化
本研究旨在评估优化公司在终端岛运营的火炬数量的潜在机会,包括石油和天然气加工、储存和出口设施,同时考虑岛上正在进行和未来的发展,以及与其他下游公司火炬网络的可能整合。不同的火炬系统满足了岛上石油和天然气处理厂的HP、MP和LP系统的火炬需求。耀斑系统合理化研究的基本驱动因素是与大量耀斑相关的缺点,例如:在热辐射和有毒气体扩散方面增加了HSE风险。作为净化和先导气体的燃料气体消耗更多。更高的运营和维护成本。本研究对Terminal Island现有的火炬进行了研究,并为每个火炬系统制定了方案,目的是使火炬数量合理化。这些办法包括拆除照明弹、将各自的照明弹负荷转移和重新分配给其他照明弹。此外,还考虑将照明弹移至海上平台/海上填海地区,以及用热辐射可忽略不计的封闭式地面照明弹取代高架照明弹。根据回收的无菌面积、吹扫气体(碳氢化合物和氮气)和中试气体消耗的减少、维护成本、运行成本、火炬数量和资本支出(用于修改范围)的估计投资等因素,对每个火炬系统开发的合理化方案进行了评估。在制定这些方案时,考虑了当前和未来的耀斑负荷。还考虑了照明弹的设计能力、容纳额外照明弹负荷的可用能力、拆除照明弹后释放的无菌区域以及将相关的分散和地面热辐射效应降至最低,以产生适当的合理化方案。在保证运行和安全要求的基础上,通过技术经济筛选减少火炬数量,开发了一个由COMPANY运营的简化和优化的Terminal Island火炬网络。从研究中得出的结论是,在现有的14(14)个耀斑中,有8(8)个耀斑占据了显著的无菌半径,可以拆除。由于照明弹合理化而恢复的无菌区(约77,000平方米)对建设新设施具有很大的价值和重要性。收回的土地可以用于未来的发展项目,而不是选择填海造地。此外,公司减少环境影响、相关HSE风险和周边地区/设施热辐射强度的目标也将实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Visualization of Oil Displacement by Foam in Porous Media Maximizing Condensate Recovery With Proven Cost Simulation for a Giant UAE Field: Base Study to Estimate Productivity between Horizontal and Vertical Wells Rationalization of Flares at Terminal Island A Geoengineering Approach to Maximum Reservoir Contact Wells Design: Case Study in a Carbonate Reservoir Under Water and Miscible Gas Injection Maximizing Brine Recovery After the Displacement of Reservoir Drill-in Fluids to Reduce Well Cost Via New, Alternate Technology In a Reservoir Offshore Abu Dhabi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1