Effects of microbial inoculant on chemical compositions and in vitro digestibility of elephant grass-based silage

Nguyen Thi Thanh Loi, Vu Thi Hanh Nguyen, Pham Quynh Anh, Quach Ngoc Tung, T. Hiep, Nguyen Thi Thu An, Chu Hoang Ha, Phi Quyet Tien
{"title":"Effects of microbial inoculant on chemical compositions and in vitro digestibility of elephant grass-based silage","authors":"Nguyen Thi Thanh Loi, Vu Thi Hanh Nguyen, Pham Quynh Anh, Quach Ngoc Tung, T. Hiep, Nguyen Thi Thu An, Chu Hoang Ha, Phi Quyet Tien","doi":"10.15625/1811-4989/17406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probiotic microbial inoculants have been used to improve fermentation quality of green forage feed in pig farming This study aimed to formulate and evaluate effects of microbial inoculants on quality and digestibility of elephant grass-based silage. Green forage formula was made based on economical and agro ingredients resulting in 36% of cost reduction in comparison to the basal diet. The additive containing 1% microbial mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum LCN13, Bacillus velezensis VTX9 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae MCN9 as starter cultures significantly reduced crude fiber (12.39 ± 1.01% Dry Matter (DM)) and neutral detergent fiber concentrations (28.49 ± 0.93% DM) after 120 h (p < 0.05). In contrast, remarkable increases (p < 0.05) were determined in metabolizable energy (2972 ± 18.18% DM) and crude protein (16.32±1.15% DM). These results indicated that metabolic activities by microbial inoculants contributed considerably to the nutritive value of the elephant grass-based diet. The experiment along ensiling time revealed that significant changes in nutritive compositions were observed at 120 h and 168 h (p < 0.05). In support of these results, in vitro digestibility indexes including dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein showed an increasing trend corresponding to ensiling times. Since there were no significant differences between 120 h and 168 h, fermentation time of 120 h was sufficient to obtain desired outcomes. These findings emphasized that elephant grass-based forage fermented with microbial inoculant could be a promising cost-effective and high-quality feed for pig production. Further investigations are required to evaluate safety, growth performance, and pig intestinal microbiota.","PeriodicalId":23622,"journal":{"name":"Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology","volume":"39 11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15625/1811-4989/17406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Probiotic microbial inoculants have been used to improve fermentation quality of green forage feed in pig farming This study aimed to formulate and evaluate effects of microbial inoculants on quality and digestibility of elephant grass-based silage. Green forage formula was made based on economical and agro ingredients resulting in 36% of cost reduction in comparison to the basal diet. The additive containing 1% microbial mixture of Lactobacillus plantarum LCN13, Bacillus velezensis VTX9 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae MCN9 as starter cultures significantly reduced crude fiber (12.39 ± 1.01% Dry Matter (DM)) and neutral detergent fiber concentrations (28.49 ± 0.93% DM) after 120 h (p < 0.05). In contrast, remarkable increases (p < 0.05) were determined in metabolizable energy (2972 ± 18.18% DM) and crude protein (16.32±1.15% DM). These results indicated that metabolic activities by microbial inoculants contributed considerably to the nutritive value of the elephant grass-based diet. The experiment along ensiling time revealed that significant changes in nutritive compositions were observed at 120 h and 168 h (p < 0.05). In support of these results, in vitro digestibility indexes including dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein showed an increasing trend corresponding to ensiling times. Since there were no significant differences between 120 h and 168 h, fermentation time of 120 h was sufficient to obtain desired outcomes. These findings emphasized that elephant grass-based forage fermented with microbial inoculant could be a promising cost-effective and high-quality feed for pig production. Further investigations are required to evaluate safety, growth performance, and pig intestinal microbiota.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微生物接种剂对象草青贮化学成分及体外消化率的影响
益生菌微生物接种剂用于提高生猪绿色饲料发酵品质,本研究旨在研制并评价微生物接种剂对象草青贮饲料品质和消化率的影响。绿色饲料配方采用经济、农业原料,与基础饲粮相比,成本降低36%。添加1%植物乳杆菌LCN13、velezensis芽孢杆菌VTX9和酿酒酵母MCN9微生物混合物作为发酵剂,120 h后粗纤维(12.39±1.01%干物质)和中性洗涤纤维(28.49±0.93% DM)浓度显著降低(p < 0.05)。代谢能(2972±18.18% DM)和粗蛋白质(16.32±1.15% DM)显著升高(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,微生物接种剂的代谢活动对象草基础日粮的营养价值有很大贡献。随着青贮时间的延长,青贮120 h和168 h的营养成分变化显著(p < 0.05)。随着青贮时间的延长,干物质、有机物和粗蛋白质的体外消化率均呈上升趋势。由于120 h和168 h之间没有显著差异,因此120 h的发酵时间足以获得理想的结果。这些结果表明,微生物接种剂发酵的象草饲料是一种极具成本效益的高品质猪饲料。需要进一步的调查来评估安全性、生长性能和猪肠道微生物群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of commercial probiotics and antibiotics on the growth of Campylobacter isolated from chicken meat in Ho Chi Minh city markets Study on the transient expression of infectious bronchitis virus spike protein in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves Association study of NAT2 rs1799931 polymorphism with male infertility Development of CRISPR/Cas9 systems to induce targeted mutations in the promoter region of the OsSRFP1 gene in rice Wild-type Caenorhabditis sinica, a model nematode for speciation and evolution, massively found in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1