The Consequences of Contention: Understanding the Aftereffects of Political Conflict and Violence

IF 9.7 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Annual Review of Political Science Pub Date : 2019-05-13 DOI:10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-064057
C. Davenport, H. Nygård, Hanne Fjelde, David A. Armstrong
{"title":"The Consequences of Contention: Understanding the Aftereffects of Political Conflict and Violence","authors":"C. Davenport, H. Nygård, Hanne Fjelde, David A. Armstrong","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-064057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What are the political and economic consequences of contention (i.e., genocide, civil war, state repression/human rights violation, terrorism, and protest)? Despite a significant amount of interest as well as quantitative research, the literature on this subject remains underdeveloped and imbalanced across topic areas. To date, investigations have been focused on particular forms of contention and specific consequences. While this research has led to some important insights, substantial limitations—as well as opportunities for future development—remain. In particular, there is a need for simultaneously investigating a wider range of consequences (beyond democracy and economic development), a wider range of contentious activity (beyond civil war, protest, and terrorism), a wider range of units of analysis (beyond the nation year), and a wider range of empirical approaches in order to handle particular difficulties confronting this type of inquiry (beyond ordinary least-squares regression). Only then will we have a better and more comprehensive understanding of what contention does and does not do politically and economically. This review takes stock of existing research and lays out an approach for looking at the problem using a more comprehensive perspective.","PeriodicalId":48264,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Political Science","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-POLISCI-050317-064057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

What are the political and economic consequences of contention (i.e., genocide, civil war, state repression/human rights violation, terrorism, and protest)? Despite a significant amount of interest as well as quantitative research, the literature on this subject remains underdeveloped and imbalanced across topic areas. To date, investigations have been focused on particular forms of contention and specific consequences. While this research has led to some important insights, substantial limitations—as well as opportunities for future development—remain. In particular, there is a need for simultaneously investigating a wider range of consequences (beyond democracy and economic development), a wider range of contentious activity (beyond civil war, protest, and terrorism), a wider range of units of analysis (beyond the nation year), and a wider range of empirical approaches in order to handle particular difficulties confronting this type of inquiry (beyond ordinary least-squares regression). Only then will we have a better and more comprehensive understanding of what contention does and does not do politically and economically. This review takes stock of existing research and lays out an approach for looking at the problem using a more comprehensive perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
争论的后果:理解政治冲突和暴力的后果
争论的政治和经济后果(即种族灭绝、内战、国家镇压/侵犯人权、恐怖主义和抗议)是什么?尽管有大量的兴趣和定量研究,但关于这一主题的文献仍然不发达,跨主题领域也不平衡。迄今为止,调查的重点是特定形式的争论和具体后果。虽然这项研究带来了一些重要的见解,但实质性的局限性——以及未来发展的机会——仍然存在。特别是,有必要同时调查更广泛的后果(超越民主和经济发展)、更广泛的争议活动(超越内战、抗议和恐怖主义)、更广泛的分析单位(超越国家年份)和更广泛的经验方法,以处理这类调查面临的特殊困难(超越普通最小二乘回归)。只有这样,我们才能更好、更全面地了解争论在政治和经济上有什么作用,没有什么作用。这篇综述对现有的研究进行了盘点,并提出了一种从更全面的角度看待问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
4.60%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Political Science has been published since 1998 to provide comprehensive coverage of critical advancements in the field. It encompasses a wide range of subjects within Political Science, such as political theory and philosophy, international relations, political economy, political behavior, American and comparative politics, public administration and policy, and methodology.
期刊最新文献
Latino Opinion and Action in the Struggle for America's Political Future Democratic Norms and the Ethics of Resistance State Policy and Immigrant Integration Global Economic Sanctions Women and Power in the Developing World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1