Realizing the Potential of the Joint Harassment/Retaliation Claim

IF 5.2 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW Yale Law Journal Pub Date : 2007-10-01 DOI:10.2307/20455785
Eisha Jain
{"title":"Realizing the Potential of the Joint Harassment/Retaliation Claim","authors":"Eisha Jain","doi":"10.2307/20455785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retaliatory and discriminatory motives commonly overlap in the workplace, but courts often disaggregate retaliatory motives from discriminatory ones when evaluating Title VII claims. This Note critiques the rationales behind disaggregation and calls for courts to understand post-complaint behavior as constituting both retaliation and escalated harassment.","PeriodicalId":48293,"journal":{"name":"Yale Law Journal","volume":"191 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20455785","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Retaliatory and discriminatory motives commonly overlap in the workplace, but courts often disaggregate retaliatory motives from discriminatory ones when evaluating Title VII claims. This Note critiques the rationales behind disaggregation and calls for courts to understand post-complaint behavior as constituting both retaliation and escalated harassment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识到联合骚扰/报复索赔的潜力
报复性动机和歧视性动机通常在工作场所重叠,但法院在评估第七章的主张时,往往会将报复性动机与歧视性动机分开。本说明批评了分类背后的理由,并呼吁法院将投诉后的行为理解为既构成报复又构成升级骚扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Yale Law Journal Online is the online companion to The Yale Law Journal. It replaces The Pocket Part, which was the first such companion to be published by a leading law review. YLJ Online will continue The Pocket Part"s mission of augmenting the scholarship printed in The Yale Law Journal by providing original Essays, legal commentaries, responses to articles printed in the Journal, podcast and iTunes University recordings of various pieces, and other works by both established and emerging academics and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Abolitionist Prison Litigation How to Save the Supreme Court Prosecuting Corporate Crime When Firms Are Too Big to Jail: Investigation, Deterrence, and Judicial Review The Statutory Separation of Powers A Cooperative Federalism Approach to Shareholder Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1