Authoritarian setback in the current crisis of Brazilian democracy

Emerson Gabardo, Marion Brepohl, Marcos Gonçalves
{"title":"Authoritarian setback in the current crisis of Brazilian democracy","authors":"Emerson Gabardo, Marion Brepohl, Marcos Gonçalves","doi":"10.5965/2175180313342021e0304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the democratic crisis experienced by Brazil from the second decade of the 21st century onwards. The aim is to investigate how this historical period can be characterized. The text asserts that it is inappropriate to understand Brazil without observing its historical distrust of democracy and lack of commitment to the rule of law. The research is based on the assumption that Brazilian modernization in the transition from the 20th to the 21st century was ambiguous but with important achievements. However, the authoritarian mentality and the gap in terms of the quality of political participation are factors of structural permanence. The hypothesis is that Brazil is experiencing a specific moment characterized by the awakening of an authoritarian and conservative mentality that impacts both the State and civil society. The research methodology is based on a bibliographical discussion, with contributions in history, political science, and law. The subjects are discussed in theoretical terms to understand the problems related to the political participation gap, the inequality between citizens, the difficulties of civic culture (mainly in the digital environment), and some inherent weaknesses in democratic performance. Starting from the idea that civic culture influences institutions and these, in turn, impact civic culture, Brazil is currently experiencing a political and cultural setback. Contrary to what could be imagined a few years ago, the process of Brazilian social modernization is threatened in its most important achievements, which implies a danger to the values ​​that sustain democracy.\nKeywords: authoritarianism; brazilian democracy; political culture; political participation; the rule of law.","PeriodicalId":21251,"journal":{"name":"Revista Tempo e Argumento","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Tempo e Argumento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5965/2175180313342021e0304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the democratic crisis experienced by Brazil from the second decade of the 21st century onwards. The aim is to investigate how this historical period can be characterized. The text asserts that it is inappropriate to understand Brazil without observing its historical distrust of democracy and lack of commitment to the rule of law. The research is based on the assumption that Brazilian modernization in the transition from the 20th to the 21st century was ambiguous but with important achievements. However, the authoritarian mentality and the gap in terms of the quality of political participation are factors of structural permanence. The hypothesis is that Brazil is experiencing a specific moment characterized by the awakening of an authoritarian and conservative mentality that impacts both the State and civil society. The research methodology is based on a bibliographical discussion, with contributions in history, political science, and law. The subjects are discussed in theoretical terms to understand the problems related to the political participation gap, the inequality between citizens, the difficulties of civic culture (mainly in the digital environment), and some inherent weaknesses in democratic performance. Starting from the idea that civic culture influences institutions and these, in turn, impact civic culture, Brazil is currently experiencing a political and cultural setback. Contrary to what could be imagined a few years ago, the process of Brazilian social modernization is threatened in its most important achievements, which implies a danger to the values ​​that sustain democracy. Keywords: authoritarianism; brazilian democracy; political culture; political participation; the rule of law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独裁主义在当前巴西民主危机中的挫折
本文分析了21世纪第二个十年以来巴西所经历的民主危机。目的是研究这一历史时期的特征。文中断言,如果不观察巴西历史上对民主的不信任和对法治的缺乏承诺,就不适合理解巴西。这项研究基于这样的假设:巴西在20世纪到21世纪的转型过程中,现代化进程是模糊的,但取得了重要成就。然而,专制心态和政治参与质量方面的差距是结构性持久性的因素。假设是,巴西正在经历一个特定的时刻,其特点是威权主义和保守心态的觉醒,影响到国家和民间社会。研究方法是基于书目讨论,与贡献在历史,政治学和法律。从理论角度讨论这些主题,以理解与政治参与差距、公民之间的不平等、公民文化的困难(主要是在数字环境中)以及民主表现中的一些固有弱点有关的问题。从公民文化影响制度,而制度又影响公民文化的观点出发,巴西目前正在经历政治和文化上的挫折。与几年前可以想象的情况相反,巴西社会现代化进程在其最重要的成就方面受到威胁,这意味着对维持民主的价值观的威胁。关键词:专制主义;巴西民主;政治文化;政治参与;法治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demarcação inacabada: a luta Apinajé pelo território dividido pela Transamazônica Editorial: Volume 15, Número 40, Ano 2023 Perspectivas guarani sobre binarismos da colonização: caminhos para além das monoculturas Direito à diferença e pluriversalidade dos povos indígenas: tempo-espaço Kanhgág Mário Juruna: “o Governo Brasileiro tem medo de me deixar ir”. As estratégias político-jurídicas do indígena Xavante para participar do IV Tribunal Russell em 1980
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1