Tweet, like, subscribe! Understanding leadership through social media use

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Leadership Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101580
Michael J. Matthews , Samuel H. Matthews , Dawei(David) Wang , Thomas K. Kelemen
{"title":"Tweet, like, subscribe! Understanding leadership through social media use","authors":"Michael J. Matthews ,&nbsp;Samuel H. Matthews ,&nbsp;Dawei(David) Wang ,&nbsp;Thomas K. Kelemen","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The proliferation of digital data has opened the door for a 21st-century social science that explores human relationships on an unprecedented scale. A particular area of interest is that of leader social media (SM) usage. As studies on leader SM usage have grown dramatically in the past several years, we take stock of the extant literature across various research disciplines. Within this manuscript, we contextualize leader SM usage and demonstrate how it compares to analogous concepts. We subsequently abridge relevant findings and reflect on methodological and theoretical components of the research studies identified in this review. Further, we outline the nature of SM data and provide practical recommendations for leadership scholars to capitalize on this rich data source in their investigations. We also offer a theoretical framework and summary of how scholars have studied leader SM usage. Specifically, this review article synthesizes the current literature while also elevating the academic rigor of leader SM research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"33 1","pages":"Article 101580"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000850","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The proliferation of digital data has opened the door for a 21st-century social science that explores human relationships on an unprecedented scale. A particular area of interest is that of leader social media (SM) usage. As studies on leader SM usage have grown dramatically in the past several years, we take stock of the extant literature across various research disciplines. Within this manuscript, we contextualize leader SM usage and demonstrate how it compares to analogous concepts. We subsequently abridge relevant findings and reflect on methodological and theoretical components of the research studies identified in this review. Further, we outline the nature of SM data and provide practical recommendations for leadership scholars to capitalize on this rich data source in their investigations. We also offer a theoretical framework and summary of how scholars have studied leader SM usage. Specifically, this review article synthesizes the current literature while also elevating the academic rigor of leader SM research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特,点赞,订阅!通过社交媒体的使用来理解领导力
数字数据的激增为21世纪以前所未有的规模探索人际关系的社会科学打开了大门。一个特别感兴趣的领域是领导者社交媒体(SM)的使用。随着对领导者SM使用的研究在过去几年中急剧增长,我们对不同研究学科的现有文献进行了盘点。在这份手稿中,我们将领导者SM的使用情况置于语境中,并展示了它与类似概念的比较。随后,我们对相关发现进行总结,并反思本综述中确定的研究的方法和理论组成部分。此外,我们概述了SM数据的性质,并为领导力学者在调查中利用这一丰富的数据源提供了实用的建议。我们还提供了一个理论框架和总结学者们是如何研究领导者SM使用的。具体来说,这篇综述文章综合了当前的文献,同时也提升了领导者SM研究的学术严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exogenous shocks: Definitions, types, and causal identification issues Editorial Board Advancing Organizational Science With Computational Process Theories The research transparency index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1