Effect of Drilling Muds Wall Slip on Reliable Frictional Pressure Loss Estimations in Offshore Drilling

G. Numkam, B. Akbari
{"title":"Effect of Drilling Muds Wall Slip on Reliable Frictional Pressure Loss Estimations in Offshore Drilling","authors":"G. Numkam, B. Akbari","doi":"10.2118/193125-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The large variations in temperature and pressure conditions that prevail in deepwater operations have drastic effects on the rheology of drilling fluids used. Under such conditions, rheological properties of oil-based drilling fluids could be detrimentally affected. The main reasons of the aforementioned include; the high sensitivity of its organic phase thermal expansion (compression) coefficient and its large viscosity buildup observed with decreasing temperatures. The consequences on drilling hydraulics may include high surge/swab pressures, poor hole cleaning, and the potential of substantial errors in estimated static and equivalent circulation densities; thereby compromising well integrity.\n Rheological models used to fit flow curve data of drilling fluids from commonly used field instruments such as the Fann viscometer, do not capture wall slip phenomenon prevalent in highly concentrated suspensions and emulsions as a result of the no-slip boundary condition in their constitutive equations. This could mean significant errors in the derived drilling hydraulic parameters for fluids displaying wall slip.\n In this study, water-based (WBM) and oil-based mud (OBM) samples were prepared using different surfactants and their rheology was characterized using a Fann 35 viscometer and MCR 52 rheometer at temperatures ranging from 10 – 75 °C. This was done to highlight differences in frictional pressure loss estimations between a commonly used field instrument and a higher precision rheometer for muds displaying wall slip behavior. The shearing gaps used in the investigation were 1.17 mm for the Fann 35 viscometer and 0.5 – 2.0 mm for the MCR 52.\n Wall slip behavior of the mud samples, as well as discontinuous shear thickening due to jamming of dispersed particles, was found to affect agreement in flow curve measurements between both instruments. For set well depth and environmental conditions, lower frictional pressure losses and cuttings transport efficiency were determined for samples showing high levels of wall slip, particularly at high temperatures. The importance of the outcome is underscored by its importance to the successful and timely completion of the wells, as well as total equipment cost.","PeriodicalId":11208,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 13, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193125-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The large variations in temperature and pressure conditions that prevail in deepwater operations have drastic effects on the rheology of drilling fluids used. Under such conditions, rheological properties of oil-based drilling fluids could be detrimentally affected. The main reasons of the aforementioned include; the high sensitivity of its organic phase thermal expansion (compression) coefficient and its large viscosity buildup observed with decreasing temperatures. The consequences on drilling hydraulics may include high surge/swab pressures, poor hole cleaning, and the potential of substantial errors in estimated static and equivalent circulation densities; thereby compromising well integrity. Rheological models used to fit flow curve data of drilling fluids from commonly used field instruments such as the Fann viscometer, do not capture wall slip phenomenon prevalent in highly concentrated suspensions and emulsions as a result of the no-slip boundary condition in their constitutive equations. This could mean significant errors in the derived drilling hydraulic parameters for fluids displaying wall slip. In this study, water-based (WBM) and oil-based mud (OBM) samples were prepared using different surfactants and their rheology was characterized using a Fann 35 viscometer and MCR 52 rheometer at temperatures ranging from 10 – 75 °C. This was done to highlight differences in frictional pressure loss estimations between a commonly used field instrument and a higher precision rheometer for muds displaying wall slip behavior. The shearing gaps used in the investigation were 1.17 mm for the Fann 35 viscometer and 0.5 – 2.0 mm for the MCR 52. Wall slip behavior of the mud samples, as well as discontinuous shear thickening due to jamming of dispersed particles, was found to affect agreement in flow curve measurements between both instruments. For set well depth and environmental conditions, lower frictional pressure losses and cuttings transport efficiency were determined for samples showing high levels of wall slip, particularly at high temperatures. The importance of the outcome is underscored by its importance to the successful and timely completion of the wells, as well as total equipment cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钻井泥浆壁滑移对海上钻井摩擦压力损失可靠估计的影响
深水作业中普遍存在的温度和压力条件的巨大变化会对所用钻井液的流变性产生巨大影响。在这种条件下,油基钻井液的流变性能可能受到不利影响。上述的主要原因包括:随着温度的降低,其有机相热膨胀(压缩)系数敏感性高,黏度增大。对钻井水力学的影响可能包括浪涌/抽汲压力高,井眼清洁效果差,以及估计静态和等效循环密度的潜在严重误差;从而损害井的完整性。用于拟合常用现场仪器(如Fann粘度计)的钻井液流动曲线数据的流变模型,由于其本构方程中的无滑移边界条件,无法捕获高浓度悬浮液和乳液中普遍存在的壁滑移现象。这可能意味着,对于显示井壁滑移的流体,导出的钻井水力参数存在重大误差。在这项研究中,使用不同的表面活性剂制备了水基(WBM)和油基泥浆(OBM)样品,并使用Fann 35粘度计和MCR 52流变仪在10 - 75℃的温度范围内表征了它们的流变性。这样做是为了强调常用的现场仪器与用于显示泥浆壁滑移行为的高精度流变仪之间的摩擦压力损失估计差异。Fann 35粘度计的剪切间隙为1.17 mm, MCR 52粘度计的剪切间隙为0.5 - 2.0 mm。泥浆样品的壁滑移行为,以及由于分散颗粒的干扰而导致的不连续剪切增厚,影响了两台仪器之间流动曲线测量的一致性。对于设定的井深和环境条件,对于具有高壁滑移水平的样品,特别是在高温下,确定了更低的摩擦压力损失和岩屑输送效率。结果的重要性体现在它对成功和及时完井以及设备总成本的重要性上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crisis as Source of Innovation Strategy at ADNOC LNG Successful Implementation of Torque and Drag Management Techniques in High Departure Wells is the Key to Safely Reach Wells Planned Total Depth in Offshore Artificial Islands Efficiency, Economics and Compliance: A Practical Planning Tool for Optimizing Cuttings Treatment First Cross-Dipole Shear Wave Imaging Application for Intersecting a Mother Open-Hole from a Near-Parallel Side-Track Wellbore Effect of Drilling Muds Wall Slip on Reliable Frictional Pressure Loss Estimations in Offshore Drilling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1