Renal depth measured by CT optimize the glomerular filtration rate using the Gates method in living donor kidney transplantation

Yan Liu, Aomei Zhao, Xueni Lu, Qi Wang, Lulu Yang, Yuemin Zhang, Aimin Yang, P. Tian, Jianjun Xue
{"title":"Renal depth measured by CT optimize the glomerular filtration rate using the Gates method in living donor kidney transplantation","authors":"Yan Liu, Aomei Zhao, Xueni Lu, Qi Wang, Lulu Yang, Yuemin Zhang, Aimin Yang, P. Tian, Jianjun Xue","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the significance of kidney depth obtained by computed tomography (CT) in measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by Gates method in living kidney transplant donors. \n \n \nMethods \nIndividual kidney depth was compared among the estimates of Tonnesen, Taylor and Li Qian formulas and CT measurements in 167 living-related kidney transplant donors respectively. While maintaining the active region of interest of kidney and background unchanged in 137 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging cases, GFR was measured by Gates' method and individual kidney compared among the estimates of Tonnesen, Taylor and Li Qian formulas and CT measurements. \n \n \nResults \nLeft/right kidney depth obtained by CT, Tonnesen, Taylor and Li Qian formula was 6.82±0.96/7.02±1.00, 5.67±0.58/5.71±0.59, 6.43±0.77/6.81±0.72 and 7.03±0.76/7.06±0.70 cm; GFR 45.44±9.04/46.61±9.06, 37.54±6.34/37.37±6.02, 43.39±7.59/44.62±6.94 and 46.99±8.04/46.70±7.30 ml/min respectively. Individual kidney depth and GFR calculated by Taylor and Li Qian were higher than those of Tonnesen formula (P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nKidney depth measured by CT improves the accuracy of kidney depth estimated by Gates method and optimizes GFR in living donors for renal transplant. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney transplantation; Glomerular filtration rate; Kidney depth","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"6 1","pages":"195-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the significance of kidney depth obtained by computed tomography (CT) in measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by Gates method in living kidney transplant donors. Methods Individual kidney depth was compared among the estimates of Tonnesen, Taylor and Li Qian formulas and CT measurements in 167 living-related kidney transplant donors respectively. While maintaining the active region of interest of kidney and background unchanged in 137 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging cases, GFR was measured by Gates' method and individual kidney compared among the estimates of Tonnesen, Taylor and Li Qian formulas and CT measurements. Results Left/right kidney depth obtained by CT, Tonnesen, Taylor and Li Qian formula was 6.82±0.96/7.02±1.00, 5.67±0.58/5.71±0.59, 6.43±0.77/6.81±0.72 and 7.03±0.76/7.06±0.70 cm; GFR 45.44±9.04/46.61±9.06, 37.54±6.34/37.37±6.02, 43.39±7.59/44.62±6.94 and 46.99±8.04/46.70±7.30 ml/min respectively. Individual kidney depth and GFR calculated by Taylor and Li Qian were higher than those of Tonnesen formula (P 0.05). Conclusions Kidney depth measured by CT improves the accuracy of kidney depth estimated by Gates method and optimizes GFR in living donors for renal transplant. Key words: Kidney transplantation; Glomerular filtration rate; Kidney depth
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT测量肾深度可优化活体肾移植的肾小球滤过率
目的探讨CT肾深度在活体肾移植供者肾小球滤过率(GFR)测定中的意义。方法将167例活体肾移植供者分别用Tonnesen、Taylor和Li Qian公式估算的肾脏深度与CT测量值进行比较。在137例99mTc-DTPA肾脏动态成像病例中,在保持肾脏感兴趣的活动区域和背景不变的情况下,采用Gates方法测量GFR,并将Tonnesen、Taylor和Li Qian公式的估计值与CT测量值进行比较。结果CT、Tonnesen、Taylor、Li Qian公式测得左/右肾深度分别为6.82±0.96/7.02±1.00、5.67±0.58/5.71±0.59、6.43±0.77/6.81±0.72、7.03±0.76/7.06±0.70 cm;GFR分别为45.44±9.04/46.61±9.06、37.54±6.34/37.37±6.02、43.39±7.59/44.62±6.94和46.99±8.04/46.70±7.30 ml/min。Taylor和Li Qian计算的个体肾深度和GFR均高于Tonnesen公式(P < 0.05)。结论CT测量肾深度可提高Gates法估算肾深度的准确性,优化活体供者肾移植GFR。关键词:肾移植;肾小球滤过率;肾脏深度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasonography to Biopsy, in Evaluation of Post-transplant Complications and Kidney Function Overview of global organ donation and transplantation in 2020 Development and prospect of clinical research on lung transplantation in post-COVID-19 era. Risk assessment of organ donation and procurement during COVID-19 epidemic Clinical analysis of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on one case with living-related kidney transplantation/ 中华器官移植杂志
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1