Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction

Celestine Udim Monday, T. Odutola
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction","authors":"Celestine Udim Monday, T. Odutola","doi":"10.2118/208653-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Natural Gas production and transportation are at risk of Gas hydrate plugging especially when in offshore environments where temperature is low and pressure is high. These plugs can eventually block the pipeline, increase back pressure, stop production and ultimately rupture gas pipelines. This study seeks to develops machine learning models after a kinetic inhibitor to predict the gas hydrate formation and pressure changes within the natural gas flow line. Green hydrate inhibitor A, B and C were obtained as plant extracts and applied in low dosages (0.01 wt.% to 0.1 wt.%) on a 12meter skid-mounted hydrate closed flow loop. From the data generated, the optimal dosages of inhibitor A, B and C were observed to be 0.02 wt.%, 0.06 wt.% and 0.1 wt.% respectively. The data associated with these optimal dosages were fed to a set of supervised machine learning algorithms (Extreme gradient boost, Gradient boost regressor and Linear regressor) and a deep learning algorithm (Artificial Neural Network). The output results from the set of supervised learning algorithms and Deep Learning algorithms were compared in terms of their accuracies in predicting the hydrate formation and the pressure within the natural gas flow line. All models had accuracies greater than 90%. This result show that the application Machine learning to solving flow assurance problems is viable. The results show that it is viable to apply machine learning algorithms to solve flow assurance problems, analyzing data and getting reports which can improve accuracy and speed of on-site decision making process.","PeriodicalId":10904,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208653-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Natural Gas production and transportation are at risk of Gas hydrate plugging especially when in offshore environments where temperature is low and pressure is high. These plugs can eventually block the pipeline, increase back pressure, stop production and ultimately rupture gas pipelines. This study seeks to develops machine learning models after a kinetic inhibitor to predict the gas hydrate formation and pressure changes within the natural gas flow line. Green hydrate inhibitor A, B and C were obtained as plant extracts and applied in low dosages (0.01 wt.% to 0.1 wt.%) on a 12meter skid-mounted hydrate closed flow loop. From the data generated, the optimal dosages of inhibitor A, B and C were observed to be 0.02 wt.%, 0.06 wt.% and 0.1 wt.% respectively. The data associated with these optimal dosages were fed to a set of supervised machine learning algorithms (Extreme gradient boost, Gradient boost regressor and Linear regressor) and a deep learning algorithm (Artificial Neural Network). The output results from the set of supervised learning algorithms and Deep Learning algorithms were compared in terms of their accuracies in predicting the hydrate formation and the pressure within the natural gas flow line. All models had accuracies greater than 90%. This result show that the application Machine learning to solving flow assurance problems is viable. The results show that it is viable to apply machine learning algorithms to solve flow assurance problems, analyzing data and getting reports which can improve accuracy and speed of on-site decision making process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习在天然气水合物形成及趋势线预测中的应用
天然气生产和运输面临着天然气水合物堵塞的风险,特别是在温度低、压力高的海上环境中。这些堵头最终会堵塞管道,增加背压,停止生产,最终导致天然气管道破裂。本研究旨在开发动态抑制剂后的机器学习模型,以预测天然气水合物的形成和天然气流线内的压力变化。绿色水合物抑制剂A, B和C以植物提取物的形式获得,并以低剂量(0.01 wt.%至0.1 wt.%)应用于12米的撬装水合物封闭流动回路。结果表明,抑制剂A、B和C的最佳用量分别为0.02 wt.%、0.06 wt.%和0.1 wt.%。与这些最佳剂量相关的数据被输入一组有监督的机器学习算法(极端梯度增强、梯度增强回归和线性回归)和深度学习算法(人工神经网络)。比较了监督学习算法和深度学习算法的输出结果在预测水合物形成和天然气管道压力方面的准确性。所有模型的准确率均大于90%。结果表明,将机器学习应用于解决流量保证问题是可行的。结果表明,将机器学习算法应用于解决流量保证问题、分析数据并生成报告是可行的,可以提高现场决策过程的准确性和速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of malodorous gases emission from wet-end white water with hydrogen peroxide Application of spruce wood flour as a cellulosic-based wood additive for recycled paper applications— A pilot paper machine study Corrosion damage and in-service inspection of retractable sootblower lances in recovery boilers Kraft recovery boiler operation with splash plate and/or beer can nozzles — a case study Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1