Assessment of Risk Associated with the Quiet Nature of Electric Vehicle: A Perception of EV Drivers and Pedestrians at Mumbai Metropolitan Region-India

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION European Transport-Trasporti Europei Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.48295/et.2021.83.1
Lalit N. Patil
{"title":"Assessment of Risk Associated with the Quiet Nature of Electric Vehicle: A Perception of EV Drivers and Pedestrians at Mumbai Metropolitan Region-India","authors":"Lalit N. Patil","doi":"10.48295/et.2021.83.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The key features of the electric vehicle (EV) from urban area emphasizes on clean air as well as quiet running nature to preserve atmospheric pollution conditions in the city, however, the new public health risk is arising due to calm running environment of electric vehicles. Since the electric vehicles run at low noise levels, pedestrians being troubled in road traffic accidents which tend to focus on the safety of the pedestrian. The aim of the present study is to analyze the perception of pedestrian’s and driver’s with the quiet nature of electric vehicles by evaluating the data obtained through a questionnaire survey and interviews conducted at the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), India. A total of 398 drivers of various driving experiences and 401 pedestrians from various locations of MMR had been responded to acquire technical data. A hypothesis is evaluated for public health risk associated with the quiet nature of electric vehicles from the driver’s gender and age perspective. In addition, the ANOVA study was carried out to test the statistical significance of risk with respect to age, gender, vehicle usage, driving experience. The results illustrate that moderate risk is associated with the quiet nature of EV and more attention is required by road users as well as drivers, nevertheless gender (P=0.3321), profession (P=0.6537), driving experience (P=0.8888), vehicle use (P=0.3819) are not significant based on driver’s perception (P value greater than 0.05), whereas driver age group (P=0.0000) is accountable for perceived risk. Similarly, considering pedestrian’s perception, gender (P=0.7954), profession (P=0.8188), distance walk (P=0.2313), location (P=0.3896) are not significant. The outcome of this study recommends the foremost need for the advanced control system in electric vehicles.","PeriodicalId":45410,"journal":{"name":"European Transport-Trasporti Europei","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Transport-Trasporti Europei","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48295/et.2021.83.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The key features of the electric vehicle (EV) from urban area emphasizes on clean air as well as quiet running nature to preserve atmospheric pollution conditions in the city, however, the new public health risk is arising due to calm running environment of electric vehicles. Since the electric vehicles run at low noise levels, pedestrians being troubled in road traffic accidents which tend to focus on the safety of the pedestrian. The aim of the present study is to analyze the perception of pedestrian’s and driver’s with the quiet nature of electric vehicles by evaluating the data obtained through a questionnaire survey and interviews conducted at the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), India. A total of 398 drivers of various driving experiences and 401 pedestrians from various locations of MMR had been responded to acquire technical data. A hypothesis is evaluated for public health risk associated with the quiet nature of electric vehicles from the driver’s gender and age perspective. In addition, the ANOVA study was carried out to test the statistical significance of risk with respect to age, gender, vehicle usage, driving experience. The results illustrate that moderate risk is associated with the quiet nature of EV and more attention is required by road users as well as drivers, nevertheless gender (P=0.3321), profession (P=0.6537), driving experience (P=0.8888), vehicle use (P=0.3819) are not significant based on driver’s perception (P value greater than 0.05), whereas driver age group (P=0.0000) is accountable for perceived risk. Similarly, considering pedestrian’s perception, gender (P=0.7954), profession (P=0.8188), distance walk (P=0.2313), location (P=0.3896) are not significant. The outcome of this study recommends the foremost need for the advanced control system in electric vehicles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与电动汽车安静特性相关的风险评估:印度孟买大都市区电动汽车司机和行人的感知
城市电动汽车的主要特点是强调清洁的空气和安静的运行环境,以保持城市大气污染状况,但电动汽车的平静运行环境也带来了新的公共卫生风险。由于电动汽车在低噪音水平下运行,行人在道路交通事故中受到困扰,行人的安全问题往往成为人们关注的焦点。本研究的目的是通过评估在印度孟买大都市区(MMR)进行的问卷调查和访谈获得的数据,分析行人和司机对电动汽车安静性质的感知。共有398名不同驾驶经验的驾驶员和401名来自MMR不同地点的行人进行了响应,以获取技术数据。从驾驶员的性别和年龄角度评估了与电动汽车安静特性相关的公共健康风险的假设。此外,进行方差分析研究,检验年龄、性别、车辆使用情况、驾驶经验对风险的统计学意义。结果表明,中度风险与电动汽车的安静特性有关,道路使用者和驾驶员都需要更多的注意,但性别(P=0.3321)、职业(P=0.6537)、驾驶经验(P=0.8888)、车辆使用(P=0.3819)对驾驶员感知风险的影响不显著(P值大于0.05),而驾驶员年龄组(P=0.0000)对感知风险负责。同样,考虑到行人的感知,性别(P=0.7954)、职业(P=0.8188)、步行距离(P=0.2313)、位置(P=0.3896)不显著。研究结果表明,电动汽车迫切需要先进的控制系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Applicative experience of Italian Guidelines for safety and monitoring of existing bridges Human Capital Approach for road accident costing in an Indian City Reverse logistics and circular economy: A literature review Proposing a Train Speed Profile Generation Method in Railway Signalling Systems Based on Internet of Things (IoT): Performance and Stability Assurance Road Safety Criteria for Mid-Block Pedestrian Crossing Facility and Application of ITS Technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1