Effect of propofol, sevoflurane, and isoflurane on postoperative cognitive dysfunction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Ying-jie Geng, Qingyi Wu, Rui-qin Zhang
{"title":"Effect of propofol, sevoflurane, and isoflurane on postoperative cognitive dysfunction following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ying-jie Geng, Qingyi Wu, Rui-qin Zhang","doi":"10.1097/SA.0000000000000320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY OBJECTIVE\nTo compare the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly surgical patients (>60years) receiving different anesthetics (propofol, sevoflurane, or isoflurane) and to identify potential biomarkers of POCD in this patient population.\n\n\nDESIGN\nProspective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.\n\n\nSETTING\nUniversity-affiliated teaching hospital.\n\n\nPATIENTS\nOne hundred and fifty elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nElderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive propofol, sevoflurane, or isoflurane anesthesia.\n\n\nMEASUREMENTS\nCognitive function was assessed using neuropsychological tests at baseline (1day before surgery [D0]), and on postoperative day 1 (D1) and day 3 (D3). Plasma S-100β and Aβ1-40 protein, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were assessed before induction of anesthesia (T0), after extubation (T1), and 1h (T2) and 24h (T3) postoperatively.\n\n\nMAIN RESULTS\nThe incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the propofol group compared to the isoflurane group and the sevoflurane group at D1 and D3 (propofol vs. isoflurane: D1 and D3, P<0.001; propofol vs. sevoflurane: D1, P=0.012; D3, P=0.013). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the sevoflurane group compared to the isoflurane group at D1 (P=0.041), but not at D3. Postoperatively, plasma S-100β and Aβ1-40 protein, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α concentrations were significantly decreased in the propofol group compared to the isoflurane group.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPropofol anesthesia may be an option for elderly surgical patients.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SA.0000000000000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly surgical patients (>60years) receiving different anesthetics (propofol, sevoflurane, or isoflurane) and to identify potential biomarkers of POCD in this patient population. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING University-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS One hundred and fifty elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive propofol, sevoflurane, or isoflurane anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS Cognitive function was assessed using neuropsychological tests at baseline (1day before surgery [D0]), and on postoperative day 1 (D1) and day 3 (D3). Plasma S-100β and Aβ1-40 protein, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were assessed before induction of anesthesia (T0), after extubation (T1), and 1h (T2) and 24h (T3) postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the propofol group compared to the isoflurane group and the sevoflurane group at D1 and D3 (propofol vs. isoflurane: D1 and D3, P<0.001; propofol vs. sevoflurane: D1, P=0.012; D3, P=0.013). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the sevoflurane group compared to the isoflurane group at D1 (P=0.041), but not at D3. Postoperatively, plasma S-100β and Aβ1-40 protein, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α concentrations were significantly decreased in the propofol group compared to the isoflurane group. CONCLUSIONS Propofol anesthesia may be an option for elderly surgical patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异丙酚、七氟醚和异氟醚对老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术后认知功能障碍的影响:一项随机对照试验
研究目的比较接受不同麻醉(异丙酚、七氟醚或异氟醚)的老年外科患者(50 ~ 60岁)术后认知功能障碍(POCD)的发生率,并确定该患者群体中潜在的POCD生物标志物。前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验。学校附属教学医院。患者:150例老年患者计划行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。干预措施:接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的老年患者被随机分配接受异丙酚、七氟醚或异氟醚麻醉。测量方法在基线(术前1天[D0])、术后第1天(D1)和第3天(D3)使用神经心理测试评估认知功能。分别于麻醉诱导前(T0)、拔管后(T1)、术后1h (T2)、24h (T3)测定血浆S-100β、a - β1-40蛋白、IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α浓度。主要结果在D1和D3时,异丙酚组POCD发生率明显低于异氟醚组和七氟醚组(异丙酚与异氟醚:D1和D3, P<0.001;异丙酚与七氟醚:D1, P=0.012;D3, P = 0.013)。D1时七氟醚组的POCD发生率明显低于异氟醚组(P=0.041), D3时无明显差异。术后与异氟醚组相比,异丙酚组血浆S-100β、a - β1-40蛋白、IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α浓度显著降低。结论异丙酚麻醉可作为老年外科患者的一种麻醉选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context is king - obstetric anaesthesia management strategies in limited resource settings. Preoperative Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Do We Have Enough “VISION” to Stop It? Implementing a Statistical Model for Protamine Titration: Effects on Coagulation in Cardiac Surgical Patients Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery: Another “VASST” Difference? Prospective Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of the Pectoral Nerves (Pecs) Block Type II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1