Sonic Mobilities: Producing Worlds in Southern China

Cameron L. White
{"title":"Sonic Mobilities: Producing Worlds in Southern China","authors":"Cameron L. White","doi":"10.1215/00219118-10773360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Second World War and, after 1945, civil war and hyperinflation further marginalized Hollywood’s influence. But it was not until the start of the Korean War that the Communist government fully committed to the nationalization of the film industry along Soviet lines. As chapter three shows, post-1949 plans for a Beijing Cinema Village – a centralized production site along the lines of a Hollywood back lot – were only officially quashed in October 1952, while local audiences were initially ambivalent about watching Soviet and Soviet-style cinema. Even after the industry pivoted fully to a socialist model, Hollywood lived on through the shadow archives of “internal reference films” – foreign movies amassed for elite private viewing – the influence of which is explored in chapter four. If the first half of Hollywood in China is, broadly speaking, a studio history, the second focuses on policy shifts, individuals and significant films. Chapters five and six discuss the PRC’s co-option of Hollywood imports to stimulate the domestic industry during its transition to a market-driven model in the 1990s; the revival of concerns about resisting Hollywood in the run-up to WTO accession; and the subsequent growth of, and battle for dominance over, the Chinese domestic market after 2001 – a battle in which collaboration and resistance were intimately entwined. Chapter seven shifts to popular Chinese film genres of the 2010s, mapping how the rise of New Year films, leitmotif blockbusters and comic franchises like Xu Zheng’s Lost in... series helped limit Hollywood’s incursions into the domestic box office. Chapter eight then considers both the Chinese film industry’s investments in Hollywood, and the challenges posed to these investments by the re-politicization of the cinematic relationship in the Xi–Trump era. The final chapter takes stock of the present, asking whether we are really seeing a Sino-Hollywood decoupling while identifying what Zhu considers will be the relationship’s key impediments in the near future. With its focus on the longue durée, this book effectively contextualizes current dynamics in relation to longer trends. While focusing primarily on policy, production and distribution, it also considers questions of exhibition and reception. Its later, contemporary sections are inevitably less focused than its earlier chapters, reflecting the difficulty of assessing present-day volatility. Nonetheless, Hollywood in China folds an unusually broad range of industry data into an overarching historical narrative: as a one-stop shop for facts and figures about the Chinese film market, and Hollywood’s presence therein – about what happened, where and when – it is therefore invaluable.","PeriodicalId":33524,"journal":{"name":"IKAT The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IKAT The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-10773360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Second World War and, after 1945, civil war and hyperinflation further marginalized Hollywood’s influence. But it was not until the start of the Korean War that the Communist government fully committed to the nationalization of the film industry along Soviet lines. As chapter three shows, post-1949 plans for a Beijing Cinema Village – a centralized production site along the lines of a Hollywood back lot – were only officially quashed in October 1952, while local audiences were initially ambivalent about watching Soviet and Soviet-style cinema. Even after the industry pivoted fully to a socialist model, Hollywood lived on through the shadow archives of “internal reference films” – foreign movies amassed for elite private viewing – the influence of which is explored in chapter four. If the first half of Hollywood in China is, broadly speaking, a studio history, the second focuses on policy shifts, individuals and significant films. Chapters five and six discuss the PRC’s co-option of Hollywood imports to stimulate the domestic industry during its transition to a market-driven model in the 1990s; the revival of concerns about resisting Hollywood in the run-up to WTO accession; and the subsequent growth of, and battle for dominance over, the Chinese domestic market after 2001 – a battle in which collaboration and resistance were intimately entwined. Chapter seven shifts to popular Chinese film genres of the 2010s, mapping how the rise of New Year films, leitmotif blockbusters and comic franchises like Xu Zheng’s Lost in... series helped limit Hollywood’s incursions into the domestic box office. Chapter eight then considers both the Chinese film industry’s investments in Hollywood, and the challenges posed to these investments by the re-politicization of the cinematic relationship in the Xi–Trump era. The final chapter takes stock of the present, asking whether we are really seeing a Sino-Hollywood decoupling while identifying what Zhu considers will be the relationship’s key impediments in the near future. With its focus on the longue durée, this book effectively contextualizes current dynamics in relation to longer trends. While focusing primarily on policy, production and distribution, it also considers questions of exhibition and reception. Its later, contemporary sections are inevitably less focused than its earlier chapters, reflecting the difficulty of assessing present-day volatility. Nonetheless, Hollywood in China folds an unusually broad range of industry data into an overarching historical narrative: as a one-stop shop for facts and figures about the Chinese film market, and Hollywood’s presence therein – about what happened, where and when – it is therefore invaluable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声音移动:在中国南方生产世界
第二次世界大战以及1945年后的内战和恶性通货膨胀进一步边缘化了好莱坞的影响力。但直到朝鲜战争开始,共产党政府才完全按照苏联的路线将电影工业国有化。正如第三章所示,1949年后北京电影村的计划——一个与好莱坞片场类似的集中制作基地——直到1952年10月才被正式取消,而当地观众最初对观看苏联和苏联风格的电影持矛盾态度。即使在电影工业完全转向社会主义模式之后,好莱坞仍然依靠“内部参考电影”的影子档案生存下去——这些电影是为精英们私人观看而收集的外国电影——第四章将探讨这些电影的影响。如果说好莱坞在中国的前半部分大体上是一部电影公司的历史,那么后半部分则侧重于政策转变、个人和重要电影。第五章和第六章讨论了20世纪90年代中国向市场驱动模式过渡期间,中国对好莱坞进口电影的合作选择,以刺激国内产业;在加入世贸组织前夕,对抵制好莱坞的担忧重新抬头;以及2001年后中国国内市场的增长和主导地位之争——在这场斗争中,合作与抵制紧密地交织在一起。第七章转向2010年代流行的中国电影类型,描绘贺岁片、主题大片和徐峥的《迷失在……系列影片帮助限制了好莱坞对国内票房的入侵。最后一章对当前进行了盘点,询问我们是否真的看到了中国与好莱坞的脱钩,同时确定了朱认为在不久的将来,这种关系的主要障碍是什么。这本书的重点是长期的时间跨度,它有效地将当前动态与长期趋势联系起来。在主要关注政策、制作和发行的同时,它也考虑了展览和接待的问题。它的后期,当代部分不可避免地没有前几章那么集中,反映了评估当今动荡的困难。尽管如此,好莱坞在中国将不同寻常的广泛行业数据整合到一个包罗万象的历史叙述中:作为一个一站式商店,提供有关中国电影市场的事实和数据,以及好莱坞在其中的存在——关于发生了什么,何时何地——因此是无价的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Peach Blossom Fan Sonic Mobilities: Producing Worlds in Southern China Transnational Hallyu: The Globalization of Korean Digital and Popular Culture Disunion: Anticommunist Nationalism and the Making of the Republic of Vietnam Editorial Foreword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1