Comparação do índice de respiração rápida e superficial (IRRS) calculado de forma direta e indireta no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca

Fernando A. M. Lessa, Cilso Dias Paes, Rodrigo Marques Tonella, Sebastião Araújo
{"title":"Comparação do índice de respiração rápida e superficial (IRRS) calculado de forma direta e indireta no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca","authors":"Fernando A. M. Lessa, Cilso Dias Paes, Rodrigo Marques Tonella, Sebastião Araújo","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552010000600009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: To compare and to analyze whether the values of rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) determined by a ventilator display and a digital ventilometer were correlated. METHODS: Twenty-two adult patients (17 males and 5 females) in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery and in mechanical ventilation were studied. Prior to the data collection, each patient was evaluated, received physical therapy, in order to promote bronchial hygiene and pulmonary reexpansion, and was positioned in elevated dorsal recumbent at 45o. After these procedures, minute ventilation (MV) and respiratory rate (RR) obtained from mechanical ventilator display and digital ventilometer were recorded. The RSBI was calculated by the ratio of RR and tidal volume (VT). Paired t-test was used to compare related variables. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the reproducibility of the scores. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the RSBI obtained from the ventilator and by the digital ventilometer (p=0.011). A high agreement for the RSBI (ICC=0.86), for the RR (ICC=0.80) for the VT (ICC=0.79) and a moderate agreement for the MV (ICC=0.74) were observed. The p-value was <0.05 for all variables. CONCLUSIONS: There were a significant agreement between the RSBI obtained from the ventilator display and the digital ventilometer. Article registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) under the number ACTRN12610000756022.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"197 1","pages":"503-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000600009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare and to analyze whether the values of rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) determined by a ventilator display and a digital ventilometer were correlated. METHODS: Twenty-two adult patients (17 males and 5 females) in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery and in mechanical ventilation were studied. Prior to the data collection, each patient was evaluated, received physical therapy, in order to promote bronchial hygiene and pulmonary reexpansion, and was positioned in elevated dorsal recumbent at 45o. After these procedures, minute ventilation (MV) and respiratory rate (RR) obtained from mechanical ventilator display and digital ventilometer were recorded. The RSBI was calculated by the ratio of RR and tidal volume (VT). Paired t-test was used to compare related variables. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the reproducibility of the scores. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the RSBI obtained from the ventilator and by the digital ventilometer (p=0.011). A high agreement for the RSBI (ICC=0.86), for the RR (ICC=0.80) for the VT (ICC=0.79) and a moderate agreement for the MV (ICC=0.74) were observed. The p-value was <0.05 for all variables. CONCLUSIONS: There were a significant agreement between the RSBI obtained from the ventilator display and the digital ventilometer. Article registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) under the number ACTRN12610000756022.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后直接和间接计算的快速呼吸指数和浅呼吸指数(IRRS)的比较
目的:比较分析呼吸机显示器与数字呼吸计测定的快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)值是否相关。方法:对22例成人心脏手术后机械通气患者(男17例,女5例)进行研究。在数据收集之前,对每位患者进行评估,接受物理治疗,以促进支气管卫生和肺再扩张,并在45°仰卧位。术后记录机械呼吸机显示器和数字呼吸计的分钟通气量(MV)和呼吸率(RR)。RSBI由RR与潮气量(VT)之比计算。采用配对t检验对相关变量进行比较。用类内相关系数(ICCs)衡量评分的可重复性。结果:通过呼吸机和数字呼吸计获得的RSBI有显著差异(p=0.011)。RSBI (ICC=0.86)、RR (ICC=0.80)、VT (ICC=0.79)的一致性较高,MV (ICC=0.74)的一致性较好。所有变量的p值均<0.05。结论:从呼吸机显示和数字呼吸计获得的RSBI之间有显著的一致性。文章在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)注册,编号为ACTRN12610000756022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the use of Kinect technology as a therapeutic alternative to improve physical capacities in older adults Results of the application of pulmonary physiotherapy in a 38-year-old post-COVID19 patient after severe pneumonia and type 2 diabetes mellitus Application of neurohabilitation therapy in a six-month-old pediatric patient as a treatment for neurodevelopmental delay (clinical case) Estudio comparativo entre el índice de masa corporal y el control postural en alumnos sanos de la carrera de Terapia Física de la Universidad Politécnica de Pachuca Acompañamiento terapéutico para la aceptación o rechazo de una prótesis: Caso de paciente infantil con amputación de miembro superior izquierdo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1