The Dichotomy of Land Laws in South Africa: The Challenges Faced by Women in Accessing Land

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Gender Technology & Development Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a6
Mandla A. Mubecua, Innocent Simphiwe Nojiyeza
{"title":"The Dichotomy of Land Laws in South Africa: The Challenges Faced by Women in Accessing Land","authors":"Mandla A. Mubecua, Innocent Simphiwe Nojiyeza","doi":"10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and other parts of the world, women rely on farming for the generation of their livelihood. However, their effort is limited by the dichotomy of land laws (statutory and customary land laws). The statutory land law promotes equality between men and women, giving women the right to buy, sell and inherit land. On the other hand, customary land law is grounded in patriarchal notions, where land is only allocated to a male figure as the head of the household. This law is the one that mostly supports men and rejects women. It is against this background that the present study argues that the dichotomy of land laws affects women. As a result, they experience a higher level of poverty than men. The present article used the legal pluralism theory to explain the existence of two different land laws in South Africa. Additionally, the study relied extensively on secondary sources as means of collecting relevant and required data. It employed strict textual analysis of the available literature relevant to the challenges of women in land ownership. The findings of the study show that the existence of customary law affects women who rely heavily on farming for their survival. On the basis of these, the study recommends that even though there are different land rights, the government should develop programmes that will ensure simultaneous operationalisation of these land laws. In addition, as much as there can be two laws that govern South African land, they should not contradict each other. Secondly, the land should be inheritable by both the male and female in a household.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and other parts of the world, women rely on farming for the generation of their livelihood. However, their effort is limited by the dichotomy of land laws (statutory and customary land laws). The statutory land law promotes equality between men and women, giving women the right to buy, sell and inherit land. On the other hand, customary land law is grounded in patriarchal notions, where land is only allocated to a male figure as the head of the household. This law is the one that mostly supports men and rejects women. It is against this background that the present study argues that the dichotomy of land laws affects women. As a result, they experience a higher level of poverty than men. The present article used the legal pluralism theory to explain the existence of two different land laws in South Africa. Additionally, the study relied extensively on secondary sources as means of collecting relevant and required data. It employed strict textual analysis of the available literature relevant to the challenges of women in land ownership. The findings of the study show that the existence of customary law affects women who rely heavily on farming for their survival. On the basis of these, the study recommends that even though there are different land rights, the government should develop programmes that will ensure simultaneous operationalisation of these land laws. In addition, as much as there can be two laws that govern South African land, they should not contradict each other. Secondly, the land should be inheritable by both the male and female in a household.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非土地法的二分法:妇女在获得土地方面面临的挑战
在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)和世界其他地区,妇女依靠农业为生。然而,他们的努力受到土地法(成文法和习惯法)的二分法的限制。土地法促进男女平等,赋予妇女购买、出售和继承土地的权利。另一方面,习惯法土地法是建立在父权观念的基础上的,在这种观念中,土地只分配给作为一家之主的男性。这项法律主要支持男性,排斥女性。正是在这种背景下,本研究认为土地法的二分法影响到妇女。因此,她们的贫困程度高于男性。本文运用法律多元主义理论来解释南非两种不同土地法的存在。此外,该研究广泛依赖二手资料作为收集相关和所需数据的手段。它对与妇女在土地所有权方面的挑战有关的现有文献进行了严格的文本分析。研究结果表明,习惯法的存在影响了严重依赖农业生存的妇女。在此基础上,该研究建议,即使存在不同的土地权利,政府也应该制定计划,确保这些土地法同时实施。此外,尽管可以有两部法律管理南非的土地,但它们不应该相互矛盾。其次,土地应该由家庭中的男性和女性共同继承。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Gender exclusion in Indonesia’s community-based forest management extension program What agricultural transition means for women in male-headed households in South Asia: an in-depth exploration of intrahousehold evaluation processes Women’s (im)mobility strategies and digital platform adoption: the case study of employees doing desk work in Pune, India Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa Women fish vendors in Kerala, India: an analytical study of access to inputs and services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1