Excess mortality in Europe and Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020

Q3 Social Sciences Stanovnistvo Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/stnv2101061m
I. Marinković, M. Galjak
{"title":"Excess mortality in Europe and Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020","authors":"I. Marinković, M. Galjak","doi":"10.2298/stnv2101061m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2020 pandemic came at a huge demographic cost, particularly regarding the increase in mortality. In this paper we examine excess deaths in Serbia and 34 other European countries in 2020. Methodological inconsistencies and big differences in how COVID-19 deaths were recorded across different countries make it difficult to make any cross-country comparisons, even with the scope limited only to Europe. Since the number of total deaths is a methodologically solid indicator, we looked at the differences between the total number of deaths in 2020 and compared that to deaths in 2019. The lowest increase in mortality - below 5% - occurred in countries in the north of Europe (Norway, Denmark, Finland, Latvia), while the highest increase - over 18% - was recorded in the southern and central parts of the continent (Albania, Northern Macedonia, Spain, Belgium, Poland, Slovenia, Russia). There is no clear geographical regularity. In 2020, Serbia had 12.6% more deaths compared to 2019, which was close to the European average. Within Serbia, statistical differences between regions were not large. Measuring the contribution of COVID-19 deaths to excess mortality is much more problematic. The excess death ratio is more helpful for understanding methodological and data-gathering issues than finding evidence about composition and divergence in mortality. According to this indicator (based on preliminary data), only 25% of excess deaths in Serbia in 2020 were caused by COVID-19, while the European average was 54%. However, in many (primarily Eastern European) countries in 2020, the indirect consequences of COVID-19 on the health of the population were more significant than the direct ones. It is precisely the ratio of COVID-19 diagnoses that led to death in total mortality that shows this. The final results may confirm this statement or indicate potential data manipulation. While this paper focuses only on the year 2020, as of Q1 of 2021, the pandemic is not nearing its end. Based on preliminary data published daily, Serbia had more COVID-19 deaths in the first four months of 2021 than for the whole of 2020. This indicates that the consequences of the pandemic for Serbia will be dire in 2021, regardless of the course the pandemic takes.","PeriodicalId":35694,"journal":{"name":"Stanovnistvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanovnistvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv2101061m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The 2020 pandemic came at a huge demographic cost, particularly regarding the increase in mortality. In this paper we examine excess deaths in Serbia and 34 other European countries in 2020. Methodological inconsistencies and big differences in how COVID-19 deaths were recorded across different countries make it difficult to make any cross-country comparisons, even with the scope limited only to Europe. Since the number of total deaths is a methodologically solid indicator, we looked at the differences between the total number of deaths in 2020 and compared that to deaths in 2019. The lowest increase in mortality - below 5% - occurred in countries in the north of Europe (Norway, Denmark, Finland, Latvia), while the highest increase - over 18% - was recorded in the southern and central parts of the continent (Albania, Northern Macedonia, Spain, Belgium, Poland, Slovenia, Russia). There is no clear geographical regularity. In 2020, Serbia had 12.6% more deaths compared to 2019, which was close to the European average. Within Serbia, statistical differences between regions were not large. Measuring the contribution of COVID-19 deaths to excess mortality is much more problematic. The excess death ratio is more helpful for understanding methodological and data-gathering issues than finding evidence about composition and divergence in mortality. According to this indicator (based on preliminary data), only 25% of excess deaths in Serbia in 2020 were caused by COVID-19, while the European average was 54%. However, in many (primarily Eastern European) countries in 2020, the indirect consequences of COVID-19 on the health of the population were more significant than the direct ones. It is precisely the ratio of COVID-19 diagnoses that led to death in total mortality that shows this. The final results may confirm this statement or indicate potential data manipulation. While this paper focuses only on the year 2020, as of Q1 of 2021, the pandemic is not nearing its end. Based on preliminary data published daily, Serbia had more COVID-19 deaths in the first four months of 2021 than for the whole of 2020. This indicates that the consequences of the pandemic for Serbia will be dire in 2021, regardless of the course the pandemic takes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年2019冠状病毒病大流行期间欧洲和塞尔维亚的死亡率过高
2020年的大流行造成了巨大的人口成本,特别是死亡率的上升。在本文中,我们研究了2020年塞尔维亚和其他34个欧洲国家的超额死亡人数。不同国家记录COVID-19死亡人数的方法不一致和巨大差异使得很难进行任何跨国比较,即使范围仅限于欧洲。由于死亡总人数在方法上是一个可靠的指标,我们研究了2020年死亡总人数之间的差异,并将其与2019年的死亡人数进行了比较。死亡率增幅最低的是北欧国家(挪威、丹麦、芬兰、拉脱维亚),低于5%,而增幅最高的是欧洲大陆南部和中部地区(阿尔巴尼亚、马其顿北部、西班牙、比利时、波兰、斯洛文尼亚、俄罗斯),增幅超过18%。没有明显的地域规律。2020年,塞尔维亚的死亡人数比2019年增加12.6%,接近欧洲平均水平。在塞尔维亚境内,各地区之间的统计差异并不大。衡量COVID-19死亡对超额死亡率的贡献要困难得多。超额死亡率比寻找关于死亡率组成和差异的证据更有助于理解方法和数据收集问题。根据这一指标(基于初步数据),2020年塞尔维亚的超额死亡人数中只有25%是由COVID-19造成的,而欧洲平均水平为54%。然而,在2020年的许多国家(主要是东欧),2019冠状病毒病对人口健康的间接影响比直接影响更为严重。正是COVID-19诊断导致的死亡占总死亡率的比例表明了这一点。最终结果可能会证实这种说法,或者指出潜在的数据操纵。虽然本文仅关注2020年,但截至2021年第一季度,大流行尚未接近尾声。根据每日公布的初步数据,塞尔维亚在2021年前四个月的COVID-19死亡人数超过了2020年全年。这表明,无论疫情发展到何种程度,这一流行病在2021年对塞尔维亚造成的后果将是可怕的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stanovnistvo
Stanovnistvo Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is there communication? Access to information by persons with disabilities in Serbia Regulation of temporary agency work and the modern labor market: a case study of Slovenia Integrating advanced technologies for enhanced demographic research and urban planning Characteristics of the labor market in Croatia and contemporary external migration Uticaj migratornih kretanja na tržište rada u zemljama Zapadnog Balkana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1