Efficacy of kaolin treatments against Drosophila suzukii and their impact on the composition and taste of processed wines

C. Linder, J. Rösti, F. Lorenzini, Pascale Deneulin, R. Badertscher, P. Kehrli
{"title":"Efficacy of kaolin treatments against Drosophila suzukii and their impact on the composition and taste of processed wines","authors":"C. Linder, J. Rösti, F. Lorenzini, Pascale Deneulin, R. Badertscher, P. Kehrli","doi":"10.5073/VITIS.2020.59.49-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drosophila suzukii is a very polyphagous species that can also tack and develop in a great variety of grape cultivars. In Switzerland, the control of D. suzukii mainly relies on prophylactic measures and kaolin, a white inert aluminosilicate mineral who's particles stick to the leaf surface and form a physical barrier that help to reduce ovipositions by the pest. Here we present a synthesis of our recent insights on the efficacy of kaolin against D. suzukii as well as on the chemical and sensory properties of the wines vinified from kaolin treated grapes. In autumn 2016, kaolin (Surround WP®) was applied in 23 field trials on various cultivars located in various winegrowing regions of Switzerland. Overall, kaolin achieved an average efficiency of 54 % and no significant differences could be observed between kaolin applications at 1 % and 2 % with 56.8 % and 57.1 % efficacy, respectively. At the higher concentration, the preventive and curative strategy were also nearly as effective with efficacies at 67.4 % and 50.3 %, respectively. In addition, a field experiment was set up on the red grape cultivar 'Mara' in 2015. This experiment revealed that three applications of kaolin at 1 % or 2 % did neither affect fermentation nor the usual chemical properties of kaolin treated wines compared to the untreated control. However, aluminum concentration within wines increased with the applied dosage of kaolin but the measured aluminum levels were 38-times lower than the maximal German threshold of 8 mg·L-1. Moreover, tasters were also not able to distinguish the aroma and the taste of wines processed from kaolin treated grapes from the untreated control. We therefore conclude that kaolin applications are effective against D. suzukii and do not cause any major risks to the environment, to wine quality and to human health.","PeriodicalId":23613,"journal":{"name":"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"49-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5073/VITIS.2020.59.49-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii is a very polyphagous species that can also tack and develop in a great variety of grape cultivars. In Switzerland, the control of D. suzukii mainly relies on prophylactic measures and kaolin, a white inert aluminosilicate mineral who's particles stick to the leaf surface and form a physical barrier that help to reduce ovipositions by the pest. Here we present a synthesis of our recent insights on the efficacy of kaolin against D. suzukii as well as on the chemical and sensory properties of the wines vinified from kaolin treated grapes. In autumn 2016, kaolin (Surround WP®) was applied in 23 field trials on various cultivars located in various winegrowing regions of Switzerland. Overall, kaolin achieved an average efficiency of 54 % and no significant differences could be observed between kaolin applications at 1 % and 2 % with 56.8 % and 57.1 % efficacy, respectively. At the higher concentration, the preventive and curative strategy were also nearly as effective with efficacies at 67.4 % and 50.3 %, respectively. In addition, a field experiment was set up on the red grape cultivar 'Mara' in 2015. This experiment revealed that three applications of kaolin at 1 % or 2 % did neither affect fermentation nor the usual chemical properties of kaolin treated wines compared to the untreated control. However, aluminum concentration within wines increased with the applied dosage of kaolin but the measured aluminum levels were 38-times lower than the maximal German threshold of 8 mg·L-1. Moreover, tasters were also not able to distinguish the aroma and the taste of wines processed from kaolin treated grapes from the untreated control. We therefore conclude that kaolin applications are effective against D. suzukii and do not cause any major risks to the environment, to wine quality and to human health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高岭土对苏氏果蝇的防治效果及其对加工葡萄酒成分和口感的影响
苏氏果蝇是一种非常多食性的物种,也可以在各种葡萄品种中繁殖和发育。在瑞士,对铃木氏夜蛾的控制主要依靠预防措施和高岭土。高岭土是一种白色的惰性铝硅酸盐矿物,其颗粒粘附在叶子表面,形成物理屏障,有助于减少害虫的产卵。在这里,我们提出了一个综合我们最近的见解高岭土对铃木氏菌的功效,以及高岭土处理的葡萄酿造的葡萄酒的化学和感官特性。2016年秋季,高岭土(Surround WP®)在瑞士不同的葡萄酒产区进行了23个不同品种的田间试验。总体而言,高岭土的平均效率为54%,在1%和2%的高岭土应用中,效率分别为56.8%和57.1%,没有显著差异。在较高浓度下,预防和治疗策略也几乎同样有效,分别为67.4%和50.3%。此外,2015年还对红葡萄品种“玛拉”进行了田间试验。该实验表明,与未处理的对照相比,三次使用1%或2%的高岭土既不影响发酵,也不影响高岭土处理过的葡萄酒的通常化学性质。然而,随着高岭土用量的增加,葡萄酒中的铝含量增加,但测得的铝含量比德国最高阈值8 mg·L-1低38倍。此外,品尝者也无法区分由高岭土处理过的葡萄和未经处理的对照葡萄加工的葡萄酒的香气和味道。因此,我们得出结论,高岭土对铃木氏菌有效,不会对环境、葡萄酒质量和人体健康造成任何重大风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of temperature on 'Pinot Noir' berry and wine quality in a steeply sloping cool climate vineyard in South Australia Three-dimensional approach for identification of red grape cultivars by fingerprint of wine anthocyanins The interplay between hormone signaling and defense gene expression in grapevine genotypes carrying genetic resistance against Plasmopara viticola Physiological changes induced by either pre- or post-veraison deficit irrigation in 'Merlot' vines grafted on two different rootstocks Global transcriptome analysis of heat stress response of grape variety 'Fantasy Seedless' under different irrigation regimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1