Further advancement in the percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: the redefined "Minimalistic Hybrid Approach" algorithm.

G. Vescovo, C. Zivelonghi, B. Scott, P. Agostoni
{"title":"Further advancement in the percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: the redefined \"Minimalistic Hybrid Approach\" algorithm.","authors":"G. Vescovo, C. Zivelonghi, B. Scott, P. Agostoni","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05381-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A careful angiographic assessment of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) is essential for optimal procedural planning. In the classic Hybrid Approach, the insertion of two guiding catheters at the beginning of the intervention is recommended. This is fundamental to perform simultaneous double injection, to achieve complete visualization of the coronary circulation and to choose the best starting strategy between antegrade wire escalation (AWE), antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) and the retrograde techniques (retrograde wire escalation [RWE] and retrograde dissection and re-entry [RDR]). In the Hybrid Algorithm the set-up is the same, regardless of the chosen first strategy, and therefore routinely uses double access. Because revascularizations of CTOs commonly require large bore catheters (7-8 French) to ensure high back up support, the femoral arterial access is preferred by most of the operators. However, the use of a double access, large introducer sheaths and femoral approach are associated with a greater risk of access-related complications and even the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events. We have previously proposed an algorithm, called \"Minimalistic Hybrid Approach\", which aims to limit the routine use of dual injection, and to favour the use of trans-radial access and smaller (6-7 French) guiding catheters. In this algorithm the chosen starting strategy depends on the complexity of the lesion assessed by J-CTO score and on the presence of favourable contralateral interventional collateral circulation. However, this novel algorithm proved to have some limitations, such as the non-specific evaluation of CTOs with ipsilateral collateral circulation and the too arbitrary choice of the starting strategy based on a J-CTO score cut-off. These considerations led to the development of an \"updated\" Minimalistic Hybrid Approach algorithm that takes into account the type of collaterals (ipsilateral or contralateral) and the \"a priori\" choice of the hybrid technique, with the highest chance of success in that specific CTO lesion (independently from the J-CTO score). One important aspect that makes this algorithm unique is its \"dynamicity\": not only for the technique to be used, as in the classic hybrid algorithm (shifting between AWE, ADR, RWE and RDR), but also for the set-up, with access site and French size to be adapted during the PCI to the technique adopted. We believe that this novel approach could further improve the safety of CTO-PCI without losing its current efficacy.","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05381-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A careful angiographic assessment of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) is essential for optimal procedural planning. In the classic Hybrid Approach, the insertion of two guiding catheters at the beginning of the intervention is recommended. This is fundamental to perform simultaneous double injection, to achieve complete visualization of the coronary circulation and to choose the best starting strategy between antegrade wire escalation (AWE), antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) and the retrograde techniques (retrograde wire escalation [RWE] and retrograde dissection and re-entry [RDR]). In the Hybrid Algorithm the set-up is the same, regardless of the chosen first strategy, and therefore routinely uses double access. Because revascularizations of CTOs commonly require large bore catheters (7-8 French) to ensure high back up support, the femoral arterial access is preferred by most of the operators. However, the use of a double access, large introducer sheaths and femoral approach are associated with a greater risk of access-related complications and even the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events. We have previously proposed an algorithm, called "Minimalistic Hybrid Approach", which aims to limit the routine use of dual injection, and to favour the use of trans-radial access and smaller (6-7 French) guiding catheters. In this algorithm the chosen starting strategy depends on the complexity of the lesion assessed by J-CTO score and on the presence of favourable contralateral interventional collateral circulation. However, this novel algorithm proved to have some limitations, such as the non-specific evaluation of CTOs with ipsilateral collateral circulation and the too arbitrary choice of the starting strategy based on a J-CTO score cut-off. These considerations led to the development of an "updated" Minimalistic Hybrid Approach algorithm that takes into account the type of collaterals (ipsilateral or contralateral) and the "a priori" choice of the hybrid technique, with the highest chance of success in that specific CTO lesion (independently from the J-CTO score). One important aspect that makes this algorithm unique is its "dynamicity": not only for the technique to be used, as in the classic hybrid algorithm (shifting between AWE, ADR, RWE and RDR), but also for the set-up, with access site and French size to be adapted during the PCI to the technique adopted. We believe that this novel approach could further improve the safety of CTO-PCI without losing its current efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉慢性全闭塞经皮血管重建术的进一步进展:重新定义的“极简混合入路”算法。
仔细的血管造影评估慢性全闭塞(CTO)是必要的最佳程序规划。在经典的混合入路中,建议在介入治疗开始时插入两根导尿管。这是同时进行双重注射的基础,以实现冠状动脉循环的完整可视化,并在顺行钢丝扩张术(AWE)、顺行夹层再入术(ADR)和逆行技术(逆行钢丝扩张术(RWE)和逆行夹层再入术(RDR))之间选择最佳起始策略。在混合算法中,设置是相同的,无论选择第一个策略,因此通常使用双重访问。由于cto的血运重建术通常需要大口径导管(7-8 French)以确保高支撑,因此大多数手术人员首选股动脉通道。然而,使用双通道、大导管鞘和股骨入路与通道相关并发症的风险更高,甚至发生主要不良心血管事件。我们之前提出了一种算法,称为“极简混合方法”,其目的是限制常规双重注射的使用,并倾向于使用跨径向通道和更小的(6-7 French)引导导管。在该算法中,选择的起始策略取决于由J-CTO评分评估的病变的复杂性以及是否存在有利的对侧介入侧支循环。然而,该算法存在一定的局限性,如对具有同侧侧支循环的cto进行非特异性评价,以及基于J-CTO评分截止点的起始策略选择过于随意。这些考虑导致了一种“更新”的最小化混合方法算法的发展,该算法考虑了侧枝的类型(同侧或对侧)和混合技术的“先验”选择,在特定的CTO病变中成功率最高(独立于J-CTO评分)。使该算法独特的一个重要方面是它的“动态性”:不仅适用于使用的技术,如经典的混合算法(在AWE, ADR, RWE和RDR之间切换),而且适用于设置,在PCI期间可根据所采用的技术调整访问站点和法国大小。我们相信这种新方法可以进一步提高CTO-PCI的安全性,而不会失去其目前的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardioangiologica
Minerva cardioangiologica CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Systolic, mean and pulse pressure values in patients with acute coronary syndrome: worth keeping an eye on. Instantaneous wave-free ratio-guided revascularization of non-culprit lesion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease: design and rationale of the WAVE registry. Cannabis, health and prevention. The role of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute coronary syndrome patients: a critical risk factor for lipid plaque burden? Left ventricular global longitudinal strain assessment in patients with Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: a call for an echocardiography-based classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1