Alexithymia and Empathy in a Non-Clinical Population: How do they Correlate?

N. Chakraborty, Harry Mehmet, T. Brugha
{"title":"Alexithymia and Empathy in a Non-Clinical Population: How do they Correlate?","authors":"N. Chakraborty, Harry Mehmet, T. Brugha","doi":"10.38192/1.7.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alexithymia and empathy are functional concepts surrounding human emotions.This study aimed to estimate the association between alexithymia and empathy within a neurotypical population.\nThe study was a cross sectional survey conducted within a non-clinical population of medical students  at a University in England using voluntary sampling to  complete the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), Basic Empathy Scale (BES), General Health Questionnaire- 12.  \nAlexithymia and empathy scores did not show a statistically significant correlation. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between total alexithymia and cognitive empathy scores (correlation co-efficient was -0.184, p value was 0.013). Men and women differed significantly on empathy scores with women showing significantly higher empathy.\nThe relationship between the understanding of one’s own emotions and the interpretation of others’ emotions are different functions with a more complex interaction than a simple linear correlation. Future research should focus on further exploring the differences between cognitive and affective empathy.\n ","PeriodicalId":75015,"journal":{"name":"The Homoeopathic physician","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Homoeopathic physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alexithymia and empathy are functional concepts surrounding human emotions.This study aimed to estimate the association between alexithymia and empathy within a neurotypical population. The study was a cross sectional survey conducted within a non-clinical population of medical students  at a University in England using voluntary sampling to  complete the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), Basic Empathy Scale (BES), General Health Questionnaire- 12.   Alexithymia and empathy scores did not show a statistically significant correlation. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between total alexithymia and cognitive empathy scores (correlation co-efficient was -0.184, p value was 0.013). Men and women differed significantly on empathy scores with women showing significantly higher empathy. The relationship between the understanding of one’s own emotions and the interpretation of others’ emotions are different functions with a more complex interaction than a simple linear correlation. Future research should focus on further exploring the differences between cognitive and affective empathy.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非临床人群述情障碍和共情:它们是如何相关的?
述情障碍和共情是围绕人类情感的功能概念。本研究旨在估计述情障碍和共情之间的关系在一个神经正常人群。本研究是在英国一所大学的非临床医学学生中进行的横断面调查,采用自愿抽样的方式完成多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS)、基本同理心量表(BES)和一般健康问卷- 12。述情障碍和共情得分没有统计学上的显著相关。总述情障碍与认知共情评分呈显著负相关(相关系数为-0.184,p值为0.013)。男性和女性在共情得分上存在显著差异,女性表现出明显更高的共情。对自身情绪的理解与对他人情绪的解释是不同的功能,其相互作用比简单的线性相关更为复杂。未来的研究应进一步探讨认知共情与情感共情之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research & Innovation Abstracts The Importance of an Innovation Culture in the NHS A World Without Childhood Blindness Metacognition for Every Clinician Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Prediction for Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1