Lime-Stabilized Solid-Waste Blends as Alternative Building Blocks in Construction

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Architecture Civil Engineering Environment Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2478/acee-2023-0018
J. James, Ayyapakam Ranganathan Gobinathan, Adhimoolam Kannan Balaji, S. Ashwin, Chinnathurai Aravind
{"title":"Lime-Stabilized Solid-Waste Blends as Alternative Building Blocks in Construction","authors":"J. James, Ayyapakam Ranganathan Gobinathan, Adhimoolam Kannan Balaji, S. Ashwin, Chinnathurai Aravind","doi":"10.2478/acee-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stabilized blocks have been gaining ground in recent times. Stabilized solid waste blocks provide an eco-friendly alternative to conventional fired bricks. The present investigation dealt with the development of lime stabilized blended solid waste blocks comprising fly ash (FA), steel slag (SS) and phosphogypsum (PG). The PG content was limited to 10% and the proportion of FA:SS was varied in the remaining 90% in the ratios of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1. The blends were stabilized using 2%, 4% and 6% lime. The blends were dry mixed, followed by the addition of a sufficient quantity of water to obtain a uniform wet mix. This mix was then packed into moulds to cast blocks. The blocks were demoulded after 24 hours under wet gunny bags and cured in water for 7 days. Similarly, the blends were also mixed with sand to prepare solid waste mortars blocks and cured for 7 days. At the end of their stipulated curing periods, the stabilized solid waste blocks and mortar blocks were tested for their compressive strength. The results of the investigation revealed that the mix LFSP621 developed the maximum strength of all combinations tested and hence, it can be concluded that the solid waste blend consisting of 60% FA, 30% SS and 10% PG stabilized with a further 6% lime by weight of the solid waste mix was the most optimal mix for developing maximum strength of the solid waste blocks. The mortar blocks, however, met with limited success. Thus, it can be concluded that stabilized solid waste blocks can become an effective alternative building material.","PeriodicalId":8117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture Civil Engineering Environment","volume":"22 1","pages":"89 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture Civil Engineering Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2023-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Stabilized blocks have been gaining ground in recent times. Stabilized solid waste blocks provide an eco-friendly alternative to conventional fired bricks. The present investigation dealt with the development of lime stabilized blended solid waste blocks comprising fly ash (FA), steel slag (SS) and phosphogypsum (PG). The PG content was limited to 10% and the proportion of FA:SS was varied in the remaining 90% in the ratios of 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1. The blends were stabilized using 2%, 4% and 6% lime. The blends were dry mixed, followed by the addition of a sufficient quantity of water to obtain a uniform wet mix. This mix was then packed into moulds to cast blocks. The blocks were demoulded after 24 hours under wet gunny bags and cured in water for 7 days. Similarly, the blends were also mixed with sand to prepare solid waste mortars blocks and cured for 7 days. At the end of their stipulated curing periods, the stabilized solid waste blocks and mortar blocks were tested for their compressive strength. The results of the investigation revealed that the mix LFSP621 developed the maximum strength of all combinations tested and hence, it can be concluded that the solid waste blend consisting of 60% FA, 30% SS and 10% PG stabilized with a further 6% lime by weight of the solid waste mix was the most optimal mix for developing maximum strength of the solid waste blocks. The mortar blocks, however, met with limited success. Thus, it can be concluded that stabilized solid waste blocks can become an effective alternative building material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石灰稳定固体-废物混合物在建筑中的替代建筑材料
近年来,抽象的稳定块越来越受欢迎。稳定的固体废物块提供了传统烧结砖的环保替代品。研究了粉煤灰(FA)、钢渣(SS)和磷石膏(PG)组成的石灰稳定混合固体废物块体的研制。PG含量限制在10%,FA:SS在剩余90%中按1:2、1:1和2:1的比例变化。混合料分别用2%、4%和6%石灰稳定。将混合物干混合,然后加入足够量的水以获得均匀的湿混合。然后将这种混合物装入模具中铸造积木。砌块在湿麻袋下放置24小时脱模,在水中固化7天。同样,将混合物与沙子混合制成固体废砂浆块,并固化7天。在规定的养护期结束时,对稳定的固体废物砌块和砂浆砌块进行了抗压强度测试。研究结果表明,LFSP621混合料在所有测试组合中表现出最大强度,因此可以得出结论,固体废物混合料由60% FA、30% SS和10% PG组成,再加入6%石灰(按重量计)稳定,是实现固体废物块体最大强度的最佳混合料。然而,迫击炮的打击收效甚微。因此,可以得出结论,稳定的固体废物块可以成为一种有效的替代建筑材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heating Ceiling System Efficiency in Different Climate Zones Experimental Tests of Laminated Glass with Embedded Steel Mesh Subjected to In-Plane Loading Professional Profile Map as a Powerful Educational Tool for Architects and Civil Engineers How do High-Rise Buildings Affect the Mental Image of Users? Case Study: Seljuk Tower in Konya Spatial Analysis of the Impact of Motor Vehicle Fires on the Urban Environment using the Example of Warsaw
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1