L. ten Damme, Shuxuan Jing, Ashley Marie Montcalm, Maisie Jepson, M. Andersen, E. Hansen
{"title":"Proper management of irrigation and nitrogen-application increases crop N-uptake efficiency and reduces nitrate leaching","authors":"L. ten Damme, Shuxuan Jing, Ashley Marie Montcalm, Maisie Jepson, M. Andersen, E. Hansen","doi":"10.1080/09064710.2022.2122864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Irrigation is, on one hand, expected to increase the risk of nitrate leaching through increased rates of percolation, but, on the other hand, enhances plant nutrient uptake and growth, thereby limiting the risk of leaching. To investigate this dichotomy, we analysed the effects of irrigation at three nitrogen (N)-application rates in spring barley (Hordeum distichum L., two experiments with 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha−1) and winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L., one experiment with 50, 150, and 250 kg N ha−1) on a coarse sandy soil in Denmark in a humid climate, which facilitates nitrate leaching. Analyses comprised grain/seed dry matter yield, N-uptake, nitrogen use efficiency (partial nitrogen budget, PNB, and partial-factor productivity, PFP) and nitrate leaching. For both crops, increasing N-application without consideration of the crops’ drought-stress responses lead to a relatively lower N-uptake in grain, lower yield, lower PNB and PFP and higher nitrate leaching, although responses were not proportionally to increasing N-application. The effect of irrigation at the lowest N-rates was limited. The non-irrigated treatments with the highest N-rates had a grain/seed yield of 3.2, 2.3 and 0.7 t ha−1 and nitrate leaching rates of 64, 72 and 127 kg N ha−1 compared to a grain/seed yield of 5.3, 5.0 and 2.6 kg N ha−1 and nitrate leaching rates of 61, 42 and 85 kg N ha−1 (for spring barley, spring barley and winter oilseed rape, respectively). These results show that synchronised management of both irrigation and N-application are essential for reducing the risk of nitrate leaching and to promote efficient crop N-uptake in periods of droughts.","PeriodicalId":7094,"journal":{"name":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science","volume":"76 1","pages":"913 - 922"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2022.2122864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Irrigation is, on one hand, expected to increase the risk of nitrate leaching through increased rates of percolation, but, on the other hand, enhances plant nutrient uptake and growth, thereby limiting the risk of leaching. To investigate this dichotomy, we analysed the effects of irrigation at three nitrogen (N)-application rates in spring barley (Hordeum distichum L., two experiments with 50, 100, and 150 kg N ha−1) and winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L., one experiment with 50, 150, and 250 kg N ha−1) on a coarse sandy soil in Denmark in a humid climate, which facilitates nitrate leaching. Analyses comprised grain/seed dry matter yield, N-uptake, nitrogen use efficiency (partial nitrogen budget, PNB, and partial-factor productivity, PFP) and nitrate leaching. For both crops, increasing N-application without consideration of the crops’ drought-stress responses lead to a relatively lower N-uptake in grain, lower yield, lower PNB and PFP and higher nitrate leaching, although responses were not proportionally to increasing N-application. The effect of irrigation at the lowest N-rates was limited. The non-irrigated treatments with the highest N-rates had a grain/seed yield of 3.2, 2.3 and 0.7 t ha−1 and nitrate leaching rates of 64, 72 and 127 kg N ha−1 compared to a grain/seed yield of 5.3, 5.0 and 2.6 kg N ha−1 and nitrate leaching rates of 61, 42 and 85 kg N ha−1 (for spring barley, spring barley and winter oilseed rape, respectively). These results show that synchronised management of both irrigation and N-application are essential for reducing the risk of nitrate leaching and to promote efficient crop N-uptake in periods of droughts.
一方面,灌溉预计会增加硝酸盐浸出的风险,通过增加渗透速率,但另一方面,促进植物养分吸收和生长,从而限制浸出的风险。为了研究这种两分法,我们分析了在丹麦潮湿气候下,春大麦(Hordeum distichum L.,两个试验分别施用50、100和150 kg N ha - 1)和冬季油菜(Brassica napus L.,一个试验分别施用50、150和250 kg N ha - 1)在粗糙沙质土壤上三种施氮量的灌溉效果,这有利于硝酸盐淋溶。分析包括谷物/种子干物质产量、氮吸收、氮利用效率(部分氮收支,PNB和部分因子生产力,PFP)和硝酸盐淋失。对于这两种作物,增加施氮量而不考虑作物的干旱胁迫响应,导致籽粒氮素吸收相对降低,产量降低,PNB和PFP降低,硝态氮淋失增加,尽管这些响应与增加施氮量不成比例。最低施氮量的灌溉效果有限。施氮量最高的非灌溉处理的籽粒/种子产量分别为3.2、2.3和0.7 t ha - 1,硝态氮淋出率分别为64、72和127 kg N ha - 1,而春大麦、春大麦和冬油菜的籽粒/种子产量分别为5.3、5.0和2.6 kg N ha - 1,硝态氮淋出率分别为61、42和85 kg N ha - 1。这些结果表明,灌溉和施氮的同步管理对于减少硝酸盐淋失风险和促进干旱时期作物有效吸收氮至关重要。