A comparison of downloads, readership and citations data for the Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas

Azam Bazrafshan , Ali Akbar Haghdoost , Morteza Zare
{"title":"A comparison of downloads, readership and citations data for the Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas","authors":"Azam Bazrafshan ,&nbsp;Ali Akbar Haghdoost ,&nbsp;Morteza Zare","doi":"10.1016/j.jmhi.2014.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article reflects the comparison of downloads, readership and citation data for the Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas. A brief analysis of the journal’s recent performance indicates that the journal articles appear to have a high rate of downloads around the world. Its published articles are from a variety of countries and the odds of accepted articles for publication is surprisingly even across regions. However, the rate of received citations to the published articles indicated a lack of considerable impact in scholarly publications. This approach has double value as it shows the overall impact of the journal in social web as well as scholarly publications and also provides future directions for the journal’s editorial boards. Altmetrics was also proposed as an alternative to the widely used citation and usage indicators in tracking the impact of individual articles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jmhi.2014.06.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2251729414000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This article reflects the comparison of downloads, readership and citation data for the Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas. A brief analysis of the journal’s recent performance indicates that the journal articles appear to have a high rate of downloads around the world. Its published articles are from a variety of countries and the odds of accepted articles for publication is surprisingly even across regions. However, the rate of received citations to the published articles indicated a lack of considerable impact in scholarly publications. This approach has double value as it shows the overall impact of the journal in social web as well as scholarly publications and also provides future directions for the journal’s editorial boards. Altmetrics was also proposed as an alternative to the widely used citation and usage indicators in tracking the impact of individual articles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《医学假设与观点》杂志的下载、读者和引用数据的比较
这篇文章反映了《医学假设与想法》杂志的下载、读者和引用数据的比较。对该期刊近期表现的简要分析表明,该期刊文章在全球的下载量似乎很高。它发表的文章来自不同的国家,而且文章被接受发表的几率在不同地区之间也惊人地相同。然而,对已发表文章的引用率表明,在学术出版物中缺乏相当大的影响力。这种方法具有双重价值,因为它显示了期刊在社交网络和学术出版物中的整体影响,也为期刊的编辑委员会提供了未来的方向。Altmetrics也被提议作为广泛使用的引用和使用指标的替代方案,用于跟踪单个文章的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Editorial Board Contents Reprogramming of adult stem/progenitor cells into iPSCs without reprogramming factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1