Collaborative procurement strategies for infrastructure projects: a multiple-case study

P. Eriksson, L. Volker, A. Kadefors, S. Lingegård, J. Larsson, Lilly Rosander
{"title":"Collaborative procurement strategies for infrastructure projects: a multiple-case study","authors":"P. Eriksson, L. Volker, A. Kadefors, S. Lingegård, J. Larsson, Lilly Rosander","doi":"10.1680/JMAPL.19.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the announcement to tender a project, several strategic decisions are made that have significant impact on the innovation and efficiency potential of a project. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare how different types of integrative and collaborative procurement strategies may enhance the opportunities for improved efficiency and innovation in infrastructure projects. Hence, it contributes to the scientific debate on buyer-supplier relationships in relation to project performance. Furthermore, it guides public client organisations in steering explicitly for integration and innovation in their projects. Interview-based case studies of ten public infrastructure projects procured based on four different types of collaborative procurement strategies in Sweden and the Netherlands were conducted. The findings indicate that the duration of the collaboration is fundamental in setting the limits for innovation and that early involvement and long-term commitments in maintenance open up opportunities for more innovation. Naturally, the potential for increased efficiency is higher than for innovation and also occurs in collaborations with limited duration. The findings confirm the importance of a learning perspective on procurement strategies for public client organisations and show the importance of explicit considerations on incentives and project governance issues in the front-end phase of a project.","PeriodicalId":44163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/JMAPL.19.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

With the announcement to tender a project, several strategic decisions are made that have significant impact on the innovation and efficiency potential of a project. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare how different types of integrative and collaborative procurement strategies may enhance the opportunities for improved efficiency and innovation in infrastructure projects. Hence, it contributes to the scientific debate on buyer-supplier relationships in relation to project performance. Furthermore, it guides public client organisations in steering explicitly for integration and innovation in their projects. Interview-based case studies of ten public infrastructure projects procured based on four different types of collaborative procurement strategies in Sweden and the Netherlands were conducted. The findings indicate that the duration of the collaboration is fundamental in setting the limits for innovation and that early involvement and long-term commitments in maintenance open up opportunities for more innovation. Naturally, the potential for increased efficiency is higher than for innovation and also occurs in collaborations with limited duration. The findings confirm the importance of a learning perspective on procurement strategies for public client organisations and show the importance of explicit considerations on incentives and project governance issues in the front-end phase of a project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础设施项目协同采购策略:多案例研究
随着项目招标的宣布,一些战略决策将对项目的创新和效率潜力产生重大影响。本研究的目的是调查和比较不同类型的综合和协作采购策略如何增加提高基础设施项目效率和创新的机会。因此,它有助于对与项目绩效有关的买方-供应商关系的科学辩论。此外,它还指导公共客户组织明确地指导其项目中的集成和创新。对瑞典和荷兰基于四种不同类型的协作采购战略采购的十个公共基础设施项目进行了基于访谈的案例研究。研究结果表明,合作的持续时间是限制创新的基础,早期的参与和长期的维护承诺为更多的创新提供了机会。当然,提高效率的潜力比创新的潜力更大,而且也发生在持续时间有限的合作中。研究结果证实了学习采购策略对公共客户组织的重要性,并显示了在项目前端阶段明确考虑激励和项目治理问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Construction Industry, An Evaluation of UK Research and Practice – by Andrew Agapiou Construction Law Quarterly The potential for construction statutory adjudication in Pakistan: drawing conclusions from the United Kingdom’s system Application of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for construction safety research Construction Law Quarterly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1