A Machine Learning Application for Field Planning

Amit Kumar
{"title":"A Machine Learning Application for Field Planning","authors":"Amit Kumar","doi":"10.4043/29224-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recently, machine learning methods have enjoyed resurgence in the oil and gas industry and provide applications to a wide variety of problems (Noshi et al. 2018). However, few address the important problem of field planning, which is the area of focus of this paper.\n This paper introduces a machine learning-based framework for field planning and specifically addresses the problem of well location planning. Unsupervised learning is used to understand characteristics of the data, followed by the creation of a regression model trained on available data in a marginal oilfield to develop a prediction tool for well productivity. This data-based prediction tool is used in a workflow to optimize well locations under uncertainty, and then in another workflow, using an adaptation from modern portfolio theory (MPT) (Markowitz 1952), to evaluate recommended well locations. The latter workflow enables the operator to select a portfolio of wells to maximize returns at a given risk tolerance.\n Both workflows are applicable to plays where drainage areas for wells are small; consequently, a well can be assumed to produce independently of other wells. This assumption is true for both early-stage shale plays and conventional fields in tight rocks.\n As compared to traditional reservoirs, a very large number of wells are drilled in shale plays, generating a very large amount of data that existing productivity prediction tools, such as reservoir simulators, find difficult to consume and use in practical timeframes. The presented framework is attractive for shales because it can easily handle large datasets.\n The framework accounts explicitly for risk resulting from uncertainty in well productivity and uses data typically acquired in the field, but not used currently for field planning.","PeriodicalId":10948,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29224-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recently, machine learning methods have enjoyed resurgence in the oil and gas industry and provide applications to a wide variety of problems (Noshi et al. 2018). However, few address the important problem of field planning, which is the area of focus of this paper. This paper introduces a machine learning-based framework for field planning and specifically addresses the problem of well location planning. Unsupervised learning is used to understand characteristics of the data, followed by the creation of a regression model trained on available data in a marginal oilfield to develop a prediction tool for well productivity. This data-based prediction tool is used in a workflow to optimize well locations under uncertainty, and then in another workflow, using an adaptation from modern portfolio theory (MPT) (Markowitz 1952), to evaluate recommended well locations. The latter workflow enables the operator to select a portfolio of wells to maximize returns at a given risk tolerance. Both workflows are applicable to plays where drainage areas for wells are small; consequently, a well can be assumed to produce independently of other wells. This assumption is true for both early-stage shale plays and conventional fields in tight rocks. As compared to traditional reservoirs, a very large number of wells are drilled in shale plays, generating a very large amount of data that existing productivity prediction tools, such as reservoir simulators, find difficult to consume and use in practical timeframes. The presented framework is attractive for shales because it can easily handle large datasets. The framework accounts explicitly for risk resulting from uncertainty in well productivity and uses data typically acquired in the field, but not used currently for field planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现场规划中的机器学习应用
最近,机器学习方法在石油和天然气行业重新兴起,并为各种各样的问题提供了应用(Noshi et al. 2018)。然而,很少有人解决现场规划的重要问题,这是本文的重点领域。本文介绍了一种基于机器学习的现场规划框架,并具体解决了井位规划问题。无监督学习用于了解数据的特征,然后根据边缘油田的可用数据创建回归模型,以开发油井产能预测工具。这种基于数据的预测工具用于在不确定情况下优化井位的工作流程,然后在另一个工作流程中,使用现代投资组合理论(MPT) (Markowitz 1952)来评估推荐的井位。后一种工作流程使作业者能够在给定的风险承受能力下选择油井组合,以实现收益最大化。这两种工作流程都适用于排水面积较小的井;因此,可以假设一口井独立于其他井进行生产。这一假设既适用于早期页岩油气藏,也适用于致密岩层中的常规油田。与传统油藏相比,在页岩气藏中钻了大量的井,产生了大量的数据,而现有的产能预测工具(如油藏模拟器)很难在实际时间内消化和使用。所提出的框架对页岩具有吸引力,因为它可以轻松处理大型数据集。该框架明确考虑了油井产能不确定性带来的风险,并使用了通常在现场获得的数据,但目前尚未用于现场规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing the New INCOSE Systems Engineering Competency Framework Using an Evidence Based Approach for Oil and Gas Companies A Machine Learning Application for Field Planning Optimization of Well Start-Up Using Integrated Well and Electrical Submersible Pump Modeling The Subsea Sand Management Challenge – What to Do with the Sand? Systems Engineering Principles to Enable Supplier-Led Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1