{"title":"Äiwoo wâtu and the typology of comparatives","authors":"Åshild Næss","doi":"10.1075/sl.20022.nae","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines a comparative construction in the Oceanic language Äiwoo and argues that it differs from those known\n in the typological literature on comparatives on two counts. It is similar to a so-called ‘exceed’ comparative in involving a\n morpheme meaning ‘go far’; but unlike canonical exceed comparatives, the construction is intransitive, and the standard of\n comparison is expressed as an oblique. Moreover, the standard is indicated not only by this oblique phrase but also by a directional marker\n on the verb, in an extension of the frequent use of directionals in Äiwoo to indicate peripheral participants. This construction thus, on\n the one hand, expands the established typology of comparative constructions; and on the other, shows that the use of directional morphemes\n to indicate peripheral participants, otherwise attested e.g. for recipients of give verbs, may extend to the standard in\n comparative constructions, pointing to an avenue for further typological exploration.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20022.nae","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper examines a comparative construction in the Oceanic language Äiwoo and argues that it differs from those known
in the typological literature on comparatives on two counts. It is similar to a so-called ‘exceed’ comparative in involving a
morpheme meaning ‘go far’; but unlike canonical exceed comparatives, the construction is intransitive, and the standard of
comparison is expressed as an oblique. Moreover, the standard is indicated not only by this oblique phrase but also by a directional marker
on the verb, in an extension of the frequent use of directionals in Äiwoo to indicate peripheral participants. This construction thus, on
the one hand, expands the established typology of comparative constructions; and on the other, shows that the use of directional morphemes
to indicate peripheral participants, otherwise attested e.g. for recipients of give verbs, may extend to the standard in
comparative constructions, pointing to an avenue for further typological exploration.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.