El ejercicio de una razón de la ciudadanía

Q4 Arts and Humanities Topicos Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.14409/topicos.2023.45.e0022

Daniel Busdygan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

El siguiente artículo se inscribe dentro de los problemas de la deliberación y constituye un análisis de la razón pública rawlsiana. Apoyados en una concepción ralwsiana de razón pública entendemos que se pueden dar respuesta a las principales objeciones que se han planteado contra este modelo, particularmente, desde el modelo habermasiano. De allí que buscamos dar cuenta de lo propicio que es el umbral de apertura que propone el modelo.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

行使公民身份的理由

下面这篇文章属于深思熟虑的问题，构成了对罗尔斯公共理性的分析。在这种情况下，我们必须考虑到，在这种情况下，公共理性的概念，特别是哈贝马斯的概念，可以得到对这种模式提出的主要反对意见的回应。因此，我们试图解释该模型提出的开放阈值是多么有利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Topicos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： TÓPICOS is a semi-annual magazine, co-edited by the Association of Philosophy Magazine of Santa Fe (ARFIL) and the Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL). Its main objective is the promotion of a space for dialogue and exchange of productions in the field of philosophical research. The Magazine is intended for the academic community of researchers and scholars of the problems addressed by current philosophy and the history of the discipline itself. It is open to all philosophical orientations and interdisciplinary dialogue with the sciences. It publishes articles and original contributions in Spanish and Portuguese languages that contribute advances in the knowledge of the topics addressed, and that contribute to the debate on the current problems of theoretical philosophy, of practical philosophy, and of the interpretation and criticism of the history of philosophy in its broadest sense, or of thought and culture.