Exploring health misinformation on WhatsApp within the African migrant and refugee community in Southeast Queensland (SEQ)

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Media International Australia Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/1329878X231177836
S. Coulibaly
{"title":"Exploring health misinformation on WhatsApp within the African migrant and refugee community in Southeast Queensland (SEQ)","authors":"S. Coulibaly","doi":"10.1177/1329878X231177836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health misinformation, a major public health challenge, is increasingly spread through social networking sites such as WhatsApp which is popular among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities including the African migrant and refugee community, a relatively disadvantaged minority in Australia. Knowledge remains limited about how health misinformation spread occurs through WhatsApp in this community. The present study explored the mechanism of health misinformation circulation on WhatsApp, and the ways members of the African community in Southeast Queensland (SEQ) respond to it. Findings include a technological aspect of WhatsApp, especially technological affordances that facilitate health misinformation spread with features such as sharing and forwarding buttons. Also, at a user or an individual level, trust in significant others favour the reception and sharing of unverified health information to WhatsApp contacts and group members. Although WhatsApp group members, especially leaders usually set up rules to moderate content including health misinformation to primarily preserve harmony in groups, lack of or suboptimal content moderation on WhatsApp exacerbates its spread among community members whose responses vary. Responses include fear and mistrust which could confuse them and hinder acceptance and compliance to public health measures from credible sources such as governments. Therefore, it is essential that public health stakeholders acknowledge and foster information-sharing culture on WhatsApp in the African community. They should also raise awareness among community members and train them on how to deal with health misinformation. The training could focus on reducing negative individual and social influences by improving literacy and self-efficacy in detecting health misinformation and decreasing echo chamber effects. Additionally, the training could emphasise health misinformation management on WhatsApp by leveraging African community leaders’ gatekeeping role and involving them in content moderation.","PeriodicalId":46880,"journal":{"name":"Media International Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media International Australia","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231177836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health misinformation, a major public health challenge, is increasingly spread through social networking sites such as WhatsApp which is popular among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities including the African migrant and refugee community, a relatively disadvantaged minority in Australia. Knowledge remains limited about how health misinformation spread occurs through WhatsApp in this community. The present study explored the mechanism of health misinformation circulation on WhatsApp, and the ways members of the African community in Southeast Queensland (SEQ) respond to it. Findings include a technological aspect of WhatsApp, especially technological affordances that facilitate health misinformation spread with features such as sharing and forwarding buttons. Also, at a user or an individual level, trust in significant others favour the reception and sharing of unverified health information to WhatsApp contacts and group members. Although WhatsApp group members, especially leaders usually set up rules to moderate content including health misinformation to primarily preserve harmony in groups, lack of or suboptimal content moderation on WhatsApp exacerbates its spread among community members whose responses vary. Responses include fear and mistrust which could confuse them and hinder acceptance and compliance to public health measures from credible sources such as governments. Therefore, it is essential that public health stakeholders acknowledge and foster information-sharing culture on WhatsApp in the African community. They should also raise awareness among community members and train them on how to deal with health misinformation. The training could focus on reducing negative individual and social influences by improving literacy and self-efficacy in detecting health misinformation and decreasing echo chamber effects. Additionally, the training could emphasise health misinformation management on WhatsApp by leveraging African community leaders’ gatekeeping role and involving them in content moderation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在昆士兰东南部非洲移民和难民社区中探索WhatsApp上的健康错误信息(SEQ)
健康方面的错误信息是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,越来越多地通过WhatsApp等社交网站传播,WhatsApp在文化和语言多样化(CALD)社区(包括非洲移民和难民社区)中很受欢迎,这是澳大利亚相对弱势的少数群体。关于如何通过WhatsApp在这个社区传播健康错误信息的知识仍然有限。本研究探讨了WhatsApp上健康错误信息传播的机制,以及东南昆士兰(SEQ)非洲社区成员对此的反应方式。研究结果包括WhatsApp的技术方面,特别是通过分享和转发按钮等功能促进健康错误信息传播的技术支持。此外,在用户或个人层面,对重要他人的信任倾向于接受未经验证的健康信息,并将其分享给WhatsApp的联系人和群组成员。尽管WhatsApp群组成员,尤其是领导者通常会制定规则来缓和包括健康错误信息在内的内容,以主要维护群组内的和谐,但WhatsApp缺乏或不理想的内容管控加剧了其在社区成员之间的传播,而社区成员的反应各不相同。反应包括恐惧和不信任,这可能使他们感到困惑,并阻碍政府等可靠来源接受和遵守公共卫生措施。因此,公共卫生利益攸关方必须承认并促进非洲社区在WhatsApp上分享信息的文化。它们还应提高社区成员的认识,并培训他们如何处理卫生错误信息。培训可侧重于通过提高识字率和自我效能来发现健康错误信息和减少回音室效应,从而减少对个人和社会的负面影响。此外,培训可以利用非洲社区领导人的把关作用,让他们参与内容审核,从而强调WhatsApp上的健康错误信息管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
AANZCA2023 Conference Special Issue: Introduction Digital Racism and Antiracism Toward Asian and Muslim Communities During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Australian Experience What audiences do with news: a broader definition of news consumption Wellness communities and vaccine hesitancy Making public or quiet listening? Media logics and public inquiries into the abuse of children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1