Abstract GS2-03: Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27,000 patients

Laura M. Spring, G. Fell, A. Arfè, L. Trippa, R. Greenup, K. Reynolds, Barbara L. Smith, B. Moy, S. Isakoff, G. Parmigiani, A. Bardia
{"title":"Abstract GS2-03: Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27,000 patients","authors":"Laura M. Spring, G. Fell, A. Arfè, L. Trippa, R. Greenup, K. Reynolds, Barbara L. Smith, B. Moy, S. Isakoff, G. Parmigiani, A. Bardia","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While the prognostic significance of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is relatively well established, the impact of adjuvant therapy in modulating relationship between pCR and long term outcomes is less clear. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of published neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies to comprehensively evaluate the association between pCR with subsequent breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage. Methods: Based on PRISMA guidelines, a search of PubMed from inception until September 2016 was performed to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials or studies featuring neoadjuvant chemotherapy that reported pCR results as well as recurrence and/or survival. Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% probability intervals (PI) were estimated for endpoints using hierarchical models. We obtained the individual patient-level data for statistical analysis using plot digitizer software. Hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% PIs, measuring the association between pCR and OS or recurrence, were estimated using Bayesian piecewise-exponential proportional hazards hierarchical models including pCR as a predictor. Random effects model was utilized to account for between-study variability in baseline hazards and the variability of the pCR effect between studies. P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 3,209 citations with associated abstracts were reviewed, and 27,895 patients from 52 studies met inclusion criteria. Attainment of pCR, as compared to absence of pCR, was associated with significantly reduced disease recurrence overall (HR 0.31, 95% PI: 0.24-0.39), and in triple negative (HR 0.18, 95% PI: 0.10-0.31), human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) (HR 0.32, 95% PI: 0.21-0.47), and trended towards significance for HR+ breast cancer (HR 0.15, 95% PI: 0.02-1.10). Similarly, pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with reduced mortality overall (HR 0.22, 95% PI: 0.15-0.30), and among all three major disease subtypes. The association of pCR with reduced recurrence was similar among studies where patients received subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.34, 95% PI: 0.18-0.61) and those without adjuvant chemotherapy (95% HR 0.36, PI: 0.27-0.54). The association between magnitude of pCR change and corresponding change in survival will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with significantly improved disease recurrence and survival, particularly for triple negative and HER2+ breast cancer. The similar outcomes with/without adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who attain pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy likely reflects tumor biology and suggests adjuvant chemotherapy could potentially be abbreviated in certain circumstances, and highlights the need for further research to evaluate clinical utility of escalation/de-escalation strategies in the adjuvant setting based on neoadjuvant response for patients with localized breast cancer. Citation Format: Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, Trippa L, Greenup R, Reynolds K, Smith BL, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Parmigiani G, Bardia A. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27,000 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-03.","PeriodicalId":12697,"journal":{"name":"General Session Abstracts","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-GS2-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Background: While the prognostic significance of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is relatively well established, the impact of adjuvant therapy in modulating relationship between pCR and long term outcomes is less clear. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of published neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies to comprehensively evaluate the association between pCR with subsequent breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage. Methods: Based on PRISMA guidelines, a search of PubMed from inception until September 2016 was performed to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were clinical trials or studies featuring neoadjuvant chemotherapy that reported pCR results as well as recurrence and/or survival. Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% probability intervals (PI) were estimated for endpoints using hierarchical models. We obtained the individual patient-level data for statistical analysis using plot digitizer software. Hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% PIs, measuring the association between pCR and OS or recurrence, were estimated using Bayesian piecewise-exponential proportional hazards hierarchical models including pCR as a predictor. Random effects model was utilized to account for between-study variability in baseline hazards and the variability of the pCR effect between studies. P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 3,209 citations with associated abstracts were reviewed, and 27,895 patients from 52 studies met inclusion criteria. Attainment of pCR, as compared to absence of pCR, was associated with significantly reduced disease recurrence overall (HR 0.31, 95% PI: 0.24-0.39), and in triple negative (HR 0.18, 95% PI: 0.10-0.31), human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) (HR 0.32, 95% PI: 0.21-0.47), and trended towards significance for HR+ breast cancer (HR 0.15, 95% PI: 0.02-1.10). Similarly, pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was also associated with reduced mortality overall (HR 0.22, 95% PI: 0.15-0.30), and among all three major disease subtypes. The association of pCR with reduced recurrence was similar among studies where patients received subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.34, 95% PI: 0.18-0.61) and those without adjuvant chemotherapy (95% HR 0.36, PI: 0.27-0.54). The association between magnitude of pCR change and corresponding change in survival will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with significantly improved disease recurrence and survival, particularly for triple negative and HER2+ breast cancer. The similar outcomes with/without adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who attain pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy likely reflects tumor biology and suggests adjuvant chemotherapy could potentially be abbreviated in certain circumstances, and highlights the need for further research to evaluate clinical utility of escalation/de-escalation strategies in the adjuvant setting based on neoadjuvant response for patients with localized breast cancer. Citation Format: Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, Trippa L, Greenup R, Reynolds K, Smith BL, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Parmigiani G, Bardia A. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27,000 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-03.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GS2-03:新辅助化疗后的病理完全缓解和对乳腺癌复发和死亡率的影响,按乳腺癌亚型和辅助化疗使用分层:超过27,000例患者的个体患者水平荟萃分析
背景:虽然病理完全缓解(pCR)在新辅助化疗后的预后意义相对较好,但辅助治疗在调节pCR与长期预后之间关系中的作用尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是对已发表的新辅助化疗研究进行系统回顾,以乳腺癌亚型和辅助化疗使用分层,综合评价pCR与随后乳腺癌复发和死亡率之间的关系。方法:基于PRISMA指南,检索PubMed从成立到2016年9月的研究,以确定符合条件的研究。纳入标准是临床试验或以新辅助化疗为特征的研究,报告pCR结果以及复发和/或生存。使用分层模型估计终点的风险比(hr)和95%概率区间(PI)。我们使用绘图数字化软件获得了个体患者水平的数据进行统计分析。使用贝叶斯分段指数比例风险等级模型(包括pCR作为预测因子)估计风险比(hr), 95% pi衡量pCR与OS或复发率之间的相关性。使用随机效应模型来解释基线危害的研究间变异性和研究间pCR效应的变异性。p值为0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:共审查了3209篇引用及相关摘要,52项研究的27,895例患者符合纳入标准。与没有pCR相比,获得pCR与疾病复发率总体显著降低相关(HR 0.31, 95% PI: 0.24-0.39),在三阴性(HR 0.18, 95% PI: 0.10-0.31)中,人表皮生长因子2阳性(HER2+) (HR 0.32, 95% PI: 0.21-0.47),并且HR+乳腺癌(HR 0.15, 95% PI: 0.02-1.10)有显著性趋势。同样,新辅助化疗后的pCR也与总体死亡率降低相关(HR 0.22, 95% PI: 0.15-0.30),在所有三种主要疾病亚型中均如此。在接受辅助化疗的患者(HR 0.34, 95% PI: 0.18-0.61)和未接受辅助化疗的患者(95% HR 0.36, PI: 0.27-0.54)中,pCR与减少复发的相关性相似。pCR变化幅度与相应的生存变化之间的关系将在会议上提出。结论:新辅助化疗后获得pCR与显著改善疾病复发率和生存率相关,特别是对于三阴性和HER2+乳腺癌。在新辅助化疗后获得pCR的患者中,有/没有辅助化疗的相似结果可能反映了肿瘤生物学,并表明在某些情况下辅助化疗可能会缩短,并强调需要进一步研究,以评估基于局部乳腺癌患者新辅助反应的辅助环境中升级/降级策略的临床效用。引用格式:Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, Trippa L, Greenup R, Reynolds K, Smith BL, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Parmigiani G, Bardia A.新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解对乳腺癌复发和死亡率的影响,乳腺癌亚型和辅助化疗使用:超过27,000例患者个体水平的meta分析[摘要]。2018年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2018年12月4-8日;费城(PA): AACR;癌症杂志,2019;79(4增刊):摘要nr GS2-03。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract GS4-02: E2112: Randomized phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy plus entinostat/placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group Abstract GS3-07: Identifying patients whose symptoms are under-recognized during breast radiotherapy: Comparison of patient and physician reports of toxicity in a multicenter cohort Abstract GS2-03: Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and mortality, stratified by breast cancer subtypes and adjuvant chemotherapy usage: Individual patient-level meta-analyses of over 27,000 patients Abstract GS5-01: A randomized community-based trial of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril or a beta blocker, carvedilol for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab Abstract GS4-02: Regional lymph node irradiation in early stage breast cancer: An EBCTCG meta-analysis of 13,000 women in 14 trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1