Freiheit und Angst

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.25162/ARSP-2021-0001
B. Zabel
{"title":"Freiheit und Angst","authors":"B. Zabel","doi":"10.25162/ARSP-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fears caused by crisis reveal the fragility of open societies. The usual narrative sees liberal right securing individual freedom, yet it guarantees this promise by means of constant government interventions. Specifically in light of the example of dealing with fear, one can show how a network of technologies of care arises out of the guarantee of the freedom of right - a network that fosters repressive and paternalistic tendencies. In opposition to this “liberal logic” of freedom, one ought to adhere to a self-reflexivity of right that overturns the aporias in a productive manner.","PeriodicalId":41477,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","volume":"89 1","pages":"7-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/ARSP-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fears caused by crisis reveal the fragility of open societies. The usual narrative sees liberal right securing individual freedom, yet it guarantees this promise by means of constant government interventions. Specifically in light of the example of dealing with fear, one can show how a network of technologies of care arises out of the guarantee of the freedom of right - a network that fosters repressive and paternalistic tendencies. In opposition to this “liberal logic” of freedom, one ought to adhere to a self-reflexivity of right that overturns the aporias in a productive manner.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由与恐惧
危机引发的恐惧暴露了开放社会的脆弱性。通常的说法是自由主义权利确保个人自由,但它通过不断的政府干预来保证这一承诺。具体地说,根据处理恐惧的例子,我们可以说明一个护理技术网络是如何产生于对权利自由的保障- -一个助长压制和家长式倾向的网络。与这种自由的“自由逻辑”相反,人们应该坚持一种权利的自我反身性,以一种富有成效的方式推翻这种秩序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Replacing the Persecution Condition for Refugeehood Hanfei: der politische Realismus in der chinesischen Philosophie Gewalt und Legitimation – Grundzüge eines unaufhebbaren Missverhältnisses Mit den Augen eines befangenen Chronisten Why Kelsen’s Basic Norm Does not Include a Transition from Is to Ought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1