Trends in Evidence-Based Medicine for Herbal Remedies and Media Coverage

Health law review Pub Date : 2006-09-22 DOI:10.7939/R34003
T. Bubela, T. Caulfield, H. Boon
{"title":"Trends in Evidence-Based Medicine for Herbal Remedies and Media Coverage","authors":"T. Bubela, T. Caulfield, H. Boon","doi":"10.7939/R34003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complementary and Alternative Medicines [CAM] are interventions that are not widely taught in medical schools and are not part of the usual arsenal of treatments and medications recommended and prescribed by physicians and available in hospitals. (1) CAM is big business ($30 billion in the US) with aggressive marketing. Their use in Europe and North America is increasing significantly. (2) For example, a 1998 phone survey of 1539 adults found that 42.1% in the United States had used at least one CAM within a twelve month period and that use had increased since 1990; the most used treatments were herbal medicine, massage, megavitamins, self-help groups, folk remedies, energy healing and homeopathy. (3) In 2003, 20% of all Canadians visited a CAM practitioner, up from 15% in 1994/5. (4) Users of CAM are more likely to have higher education levels and report lower health status. (5) Common health problems treated with CAM are anxiety, back problems, chronic pain, and urinary tract problems. Use of CAM is dependent, not on dissatisfaction with conventional medicine as it is most commonly used in association with conventional medicine, but on philosophical orientations towards health and life, such as feminism, spirituality, and personal growth. (6) Other studies suggest that CAM use allows patients and consumers greater control over their health and a level of self-empowerment. (7) For these reasons, it has become increasingly important to understand the nature and impact of popular representations of CAM in this context. The combination of educated and self-empowered users of CAM suggests a high degree of reliance on information sources outside of mainstream medical practitioners. Not surprisingly, coverage in sources including newspapers, television, magazines, other media, and the internet has increased to meet the demand for information. A vast quantity of information of varying quality exists in the media and on the internet. (8) There are concerns, however, that the media and internet provide too rosy a picture of CAM (9) and downplay adverse reactions to CAM, which can be dangerous and potentially fatal. (10) Such coverage augments the common misperception that CAM is natural and therefore, less harmful than conventional medical treatments. (11) Indeed, Barnes et al. (1998) found that users of CAM were less likely to report adverse effects than users of over-the-counter medicines. (12) These factors suggest that significant improvements need to be made to knowledge translation mechanisms for the public, healthcare professionals, and policy makers. The response of the medical and scientific community has been an increasing interest in CAM issues. There has been an increase in the number and proportion of clinical trials of CAM, which suggests a trend toward an evidence-based approach. The cumulative number of clinical trial articles indexed on MEDLINE, however, remains small (0.4%), and more high-quality original research is needed. (13) Further, the proportion of those articles on CAM indexed as clinical trial-type studies is 2.1%, but rising. (14) The lack of clinical trials may be due to a number of factors. There may be little incentive for commercial manufacturers of CAM products to run expensive clinical trials. However, the recent move to evidence-based health claims for CAM labeling and advertising in Canada (15) may drive an increase in CAM clinical trials in that country. Some authors have suggested that there may be a publishing bias from mainstream medical journals during peer review or editorial process, in either rejecting CAM studies outright or favouring CAM studies with negative results. (16) However, others suggest that most CAM studies may simply be of insufficient quality to be published in high impact factor medical journals. (17) At least 50% of CAM articles were published in journals with no impact factor. (18) Here we present preliminary data from a study that explores how knowledge is translated in the socio-economic-political context of CAM. …","PeriodicalId":87182,"journal":{"name":"Health law review","volume":"22 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R34003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Complementary and Alternative Medicines [CAM] are interventions that are not widely taught in medical schools and are not part of the usual arsenal of treatments and medications recommended and prescribed by physicians and available in hospitals. (1) CAM is big business ($30 billion in the US) with aggressive marketing. Their use in Europe and North America is increasing significantly. (2) For example, a 1998 phone survey of 1539 adults found that 42.1% in the United States had used at least one CAM within a twelve month period and that use had increased since 1990; the most used treatments were herbal medicine, massage, megavitamins, self-help groups, folk remedies, energy healing and homeopathy. (3) In 2003, 20% of all Canadians visited a CAM practitioner, up from 15% in 1994/5. (4) Users of CAM are more likely to have higher education levels and report lower health status. (5) Common health problems treated with CAM are anxiety, back problems, chronic pain, and urinary tract problems. Use of CAM is dependent, not on dissatisfaction with conventional medicine as it is most commonly used in association with conventional medicine, but on philosophical orientations towards health and life, such as feminism, spirituality, and personal growth. (6) Other studies suggest that CAM use allows patients and consumers greater control over their health and a level of self-empowerment. (7) For these reasons, it has become increasingly important to understand the nature and impact of popular representations of CAM in this context. The combination of educated and self-empowered users of CAM suggests a high degree of reliance on information sources outside of mainstream medical practitioners. Not surprisingly, coverage in sources including newspapers, television, magazines, other media, and the internet has increased to meet the demand for information. A vast quantity of information of varying quality exists in the media and on the internet. (8) There are concerns, however, that the media and internet provide too rosy a picture of CAM (9) and downplay adverse reactions to CAM, which can be dangerous and potentially fatal. (10) Such coverage augments the common misperception that CAM is natural and therefore, less harmful than conventional medical treatments. (11) Indeed, Barnes et al. (1998) found that users of CAM were less likely to report adverse effects than users of over-the-counter medicines. (12) These factors suggest that significant improvements need to be made to knowledge translation mechanisms for the public, healthcare professionals, and policy makers. The response of the medical and scientific community has been an increasing interest in CAM issues. There has been an increase in the number and proportion of clinical trials of CAM, which suggests a trend toward an evidence-based approach. The cumulative number of clinical trial articles indexed on MEDLINE, however, remains small (0.4%), and more high-quality original research is needed. (13) Further, the proportion of those articles on CAM indexed as clinical trial-type studies is 2.1%, but rising. (14) The lack of clinical trials may be due to a number of factors. There may be little incentive for commercial manufacturers of CAM products to run expensive clinical trials. However, the recent move to evidence-based health claims for CAM labeling and advertising in Canada (15) may drive an increase in CAM clinical trials in that country. Some authors have suggested that there may be a publishing bias from mainstream medical journals during peer review or editorial process, in either rejecting CAM studies outright or favouring CAM studies with negative results. (16) However, others suggest that most CAM studies may simply be of insufficient quality to be published in high impact factor medical journals. (17) At least 50% of CAM articles were published in journals with no impact factor. (18) Here we present preliminary data from a study that explores how knowledge is translated in the socio-economic-political context of CAM. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草药循证医学的趋势和媒体报道
补充和替代医学[CAM]是在医学院没有广泛教授的干预措施,也不是医生推荐和处方的通常治疗和药物库的一部分,也不是医院提供的。(1) CAM是一家规模庞大的企业(在美国的市值为300亿美元),营销力度很大。它们在欧洲和北美的使用正在显著增加。(2)例如,1998年对1539名成年人进行的电话调查发现,42.1%的美国人在12个月内至少使用过一次CAM,而且自1990年以来,这种使用有所增加;最常用的治疗方法是草药、按摩、维生素、自助团体、民间疗法、能量疗法和顺势疗法。(3) 2003年,20%的加拿大人去看CAM医生,比1994/5年的15%有所上升。(4) CAM使用者的文化程度较高,健康状况较差。(5) CAM治疗的常见健康问题有焦虑、背部问题、慢性疼痛和泌尿系统问题。CAM的使用是依赖的,不是对传统医学的不满,因为它最常与传统医学联系在一起,而是对健康和生活的哲学取向,如女权主义、灵性和个人成长。(6)其他研究表明,辅助医学的使用使患者和消费者能够更好地控制自己的健康,并在一定程度上赋予自己权力。(7)由于这些原因,在这种情况下,理解CAM的流行表现形式的性质和影响变得越来越重要。CAM的受教育用户和自我授权用户的结合表明,他们高度依赖主流医生以外的信息来源。毫不奇怪,包括报纸、电视、杂志、其他媒体和互联网在内的各种来源的报道都在增加,以满足对信息的需求。媒体和互联网上存在着大量质量参差不齐的信息。然而,也有人担心,媒体和互联网对CAM的描述过于乐观,并淡化了CAM的不良反应,这些不良反应可能是危险的,甚至可能致命。(10)这种覆盖加剧了一种普遍的误解,即辅助医学是自然的,因此比传统医学治疗的危害小。(11)事实上,Barnes等人(1998)发现,与使用非处方药的人相比,使用CAM的人报告不良反应的可能性更小。(12)这些因素表明,需要对公众、卫生保健专业人员和政策制定者的知识转化机制进行重大改进。医学界和科学界的反应是对辅助医学问题越来越感兴趣。CAM临床试验的数量和比例都有所增加,这表明一种循证方法的趋势。然而,在MEDLINE上索引的临床试验文章的累积数量仍然很少(0.4%),需要更多高质量的原始研究。(13)此外,在CAM上被索引为临床试验型研究的文章比例为2.1%,但仍在上升。缺乏临床试验可能是由于许多因素造成的。CAM产品的商业制造商可能没有动力进行昂贵的临床试验。然而,最近在加拿大针对CAM标签和广告的循证健康声明的行动(15)可能会推动该国CAM临床试验的增加。一些作者提出,在同行评议或编辑过程中,主流医学期刊可能存在出版偏见,要么直接拒绝辅助医学研究,要么支持有负面结果的辅助医学研究。(16)然而,其他人认为,大多数CAM研究可能只是质量不足,无法在高影响因子医学期刊上发表。(17)至少50%的CAM文章发表在没有影响因子的期刊上。(18)在这里,我们提供了一项研究的初步数据,该研究探讨了知识如何在CAM的社会经济政治背景下转化。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discussion on Several Problems Worth Discussing in the Work of Health Examination Media Representations of Genetic Discoveries: Hype in the Headlines? Nutrigenomics, Mass Media and Commercialization Pressures Media Portrayal of Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research Public Trust and Regulatory Governance as represented through the Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1