OP022/#597 Optimizing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis

A. Rosati, C. Marchetti, F. De Felice, S. Boccia, L. Vertechy, M. Pavone, E. Palluzzi, G. Scambia, A. Fagotti
{"title":"OP022/#597 Optimizing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis","authors":"A. Rosati, C. Marchetti, F. De Felice, S. Boccia, L. Vertechy, M. Pavone, E. Palluzzi, G. Scambia, A. Fagotti","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2021-igcs.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To identify gene expression profiles and interacting pathways in BRCA1- and BRCA2- associated high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) as compared to one another and to BRCA wild type, homologous recombination proficient (HRP) tumors. Methods of total samples, and HRP were analyzed. Gene was collected from Tempus and were to identify differ-entially expressed genes (DEG) with p-value and fold change of Meta and pathway analyses were performed among BRCA1, BRCA2 and HRP groups using Venn diagram and Advaita Bio ’ s iPathwayGuide. BRCA mutated and wild type (wt) ID8 mouse cell lines were used for protein expression and seahorse assay for metabolism analysis. Results From 18,284 genes with measured expression, 843 (4.6%) DEG were found between BRCA2 vs BRCA1, 748 (4.1%) between BRCA2 vs HRP and 1,858 (10.2%) between BRCA1 and HRP. On meta-analysis of the three comparisons, pathway analysis revealed significant involvement of Wnt signaling pathway and oxidative phosphorylation unique to BRCA2 group compared to fibroblast growth factor signaling PI3K-Akt signaling for BRCA1. Western blot analysis con-firmed higher expression of oxidative phosphorylation com-plex proteins in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutated lines and differential expression of b catenin between BRCA mutated versus wt cell lines. Seahorse assay showed higher oxidative consumption rate in BRCA mutated versus wt cells. Conclusions Our study identified differential pathway regula-tion for BRCA2 versus BRCA1 associated HGSOC, suggesting each should be considered a separate phenotype with unique opportunities for targeted therapy.","PeriodicalId":19598,"journal":{"name":"Oral Featured Posters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Featured Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-igcs.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To identify gene expression profiles and interacting pathways in BRCA1- and BRCA2- associated high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) as compared to one another and to BRCA wild type, homologous recombination proficient (HRP) tumors. Methods of total samples, and HRP were analyzed. Gene was collected from Tempus and were to identify differ-entially expressed genes (DEG) with p-value and fold change of Meta and pathway analyses were performed among BRCA1, BRCA2 and HRP groups using Venn diagram and Advaita Bio ’ s iPathwayGuide. BRCA mutated and wild type (wt) ID8 mouse cell lines were used for protein expression and seahorse assay for metabolism analysis. Results From 18,284 genes with measured expression, 843 (4.6%) DEG were found between BRCA2 vs BRCA1, 748 (4.1%) between BRCA2 vs HRP and 1,858 (10.2%) between BRCA1 and HRP. On meta-analysis of the three comparisons, pathway analysis revealed significant involvement of Wnt signaling pathway and oxidative phosphorylation unique to BRCA2 group compared to fibroblast growth factor signaling PI3K-Akt signaling for BRCA1. Western blot analysis con-firmed higher expression of oxidative phosphorylation com-plex proteins in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutated lines and differential expression of b catenin between BRCA mutated versus wt cell lines. Seahorse assay showed higher oxidative consumption rate in BRCA mutated versus wt cells. Conclusions Our study identified differential pathway regula-tion for BRCA2 versus BRCA1 associated HGSOC, suggesting each should be considered a separate phenotype with unique opportunities for targeted therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化晚期上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗周期数:倾向评分匹配分析
目的探讨BRCA1-和BRCA2-相关的高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSOC)的基因表达谱和相互作用途径,并将其与BRCA野生型同源重组精通型(HRP)肿瘤进行比较。方法对总样品、HRP进行分析。从Tempus中收集基因,利用Meta的p值和折叠变化来鉴定差异表达基因(DEG),并使用Venn图和Advaita Bio的iPathwayGuide对BRCA1、BRCA2和HRP组进行通路分析。用BRCA突变和野生型(wt) ID8小鼠细胞系进行蛋白表达,用海马实验进行代谢分析。结果在测定表达的18284个基因中,在BRCA2与BRCA1之间发现843个(4.6%)DEG,在BRCA2与HRP之间发现748个(4.1%)DEG,在BRCA1与HRP之间发现1858个(10.2%)DEG。通过对三个比较的荟萃分析,通路分析显示,与成纤维细胞生长因子信号通路PI3K-Akt信号传导BRCA1相比,Wnt信号通路和BRCA2组特有的氧化磷酸化显著参与。Western blot分析证实,BRCA1/BRCA2突变细胞系中氧化磷酸化复合物蛋白的表达较高,BRCA突变细胞系与wt突变细胞系之间b catenin的表达存在差异。海马实验显示BRCA突变细胞的氧化消耗率高于wt细胞。我们的研究确定了BRCA2与BRCA1相关的HGSOC的不同途径调节,这表明每种都应被视为一种单独的表型,具有独特的靶向治疗机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OP022/#597 Optimizing the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a propensity-score matching analysis OP003/#32 Preferences and experiences regarding the use of the self-sampling device in the hrHPV screening for cervical cancer OP005/#352 Safety of vaginal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a multicenter cohort study on behalf of the 4C (Canadian cervical cancer collaborative) working group OP017/#81 Endometrial cancer prognosis in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis. A retrospective nationwide cohort study of 40,847 women OP021/#475 Separating the BRCA1 and BRCA2 phenotype, a pathway analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1