Four Sides of the Coin: The Interplay of Interests in German and Polish Pension Industries

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Radical Political Economics Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1177/04866134221119258
A. Ząbkowicz
{"title":"Four Sides of the Coin: The Interplay of Interests in German and Polish Pension Industries","authors":"A. Ząbkowicz","doi":"10.1177/04866134221119258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pension reforms tend toward privatization of fund management, capitalization of savings, and redistribution of risk. An overview of reforms in the opening section identifies the course of the institutional change in Germany and in Poland, which can be broadly associated with Western European and Eastern European types of pension design, respectively. The second section offers a methodical insight in interests of four parties of the game, that is, the government, financial sector, nonfinancial companies, and trade unions, as well as prospective pensioners or actual retirees. The major section provides a review of arguments in favor of pension funding, drawing from media debates, and official announcements, with the aim to identify the rationale for pension funding. Next, it considers how this logical position is related to specific material interests. JEL Classification: B52, P16, P52","PeriodicalId":46719,"journal":{"name":"Review of Radical Political Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"269 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Radical Political Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134221119258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pension reforms tend toward privatization of fund management, capitalization of savings, and redistribution of risk. An overview of reforms in the opening section identifies the course of the institutional change in Germany and in Poland, which can be broadly associated with Western European and Eastern European types of pension design, respectively. The second section offers a methodical insight in interests of four parties of the game, that is, the government, financial sector, nonfinancial companies, and trade unions, as well as prospective pensioners or actual retirees. The major section provides a review of arguments in favor of pension funding, drawing from media debates, and official announcements, with the aim to identify the rationale for pension funding. Next, it considers how this logical position is related to specific material interests. JEL Classification: B52, P16, P52
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬币的四个面:德国和波兰养老金行业利益的相互影响
养老金改革趋向于基金管理私有化、储蓄资本化和风险再分配。开头部分对改革的概述确定了德国和波兰制度变革的过程,这两个国家可以分别与西欧和东欧的养老金设计类型广泛联系起来。第二部分系统地分析了博弈各方的利益,即政府、金融部门、非金融公司和工会,以及未来的养老金领取者或实际的退休人员。主要部分从媒体辩论和官方公告中对支持养老基金的论点进行了回顾,目的是确定养老基金的基本原理。接下来,它考虑了这种逻辑立场如何与特定的物质利益相关联。JEL分类:B52, P16, P52
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Review of Radical Political Economics (RRPE) promotes critical inquiry into all areas of economic, social, and political reality. As the journal of the Union for Radical Political Economics, RRPE publishes innovative research in political economy broadly defined including, but not confined to, Marxian economies, post-Keynesian economics, Sraffian economics, feminist economics, and radical institutional economics. We are actively seeking submissions concerned with policy, history of thought, and economics and the environment. RRPE reflects an interdisciplinary approach to the study, development, and application of radical political economic analysis to social problems.
期刊最新文献
Sovereign Credit Rating: Impact on Social Investment and Role in Financial Subordination From a Spoke to a Hub: The Case of South Korea Debate as a Pedagogical Tool for Pluralist Economics Education Abstracts Chinese September 2024 Abstracts Spanish September 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1