Domain-specific discrepancies between self- and caseworkers’ proxy- reports of emotional and behavioral difficulties in unaccompanied refugees

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13632752.2022.2129369
Marco Walg, Florentine Löwer, Stephan Bender, G. Hapfelmeier
{"title":"Domain-specific discrepancies between self- and caseworkers’ proxy- reports of emotional and behavioral difficulties in unaccompanied refugees","authors":"Marco Walg, Florentine Löwer, Stephan Bender, G. Hapfelmeier","doi":"10.1080/13632752.2022.2129369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to assess adolescent refugees’ psychological distress and examine how reliably caseworkers can assess distress through a proxy-report instrument. The distress of 102 unaccompanied refugees between 16 and 21 years of age housed in youth welfare accommodations in Germany was assessed by self-report using the Brief Symptom Checklist and by proxy-report through the Child Behavior Checklist. Independent of residence status, the self and proxy ratings reveal that more than half of the refugees suffer from increased levels of psychological distress, particularly from anxiety and somatisation. There was a moderate positive correlation between the total scales of the two instruments. The high number of clinically meaningful distress poses a great challenge to caseworkers in facilities for unaccompanied refugees. The Child Behavior Checklist can be a suitable measure to detect clinically meaningful problems, but its validity seems to depend on a good relationship between caseworker and refugee.","PeriodicalId":46308,"journal":{"name":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","volume":"59 1","pages":"163 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2022.2129369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to assess adolescent refugees’ psychological distress and examine how reliably caseworkers can assess distress through a proxy-report instrument. The distress of 102 unaccompanied refugees between 16 and 21 years of age housed in youth welfare accommodations in Germany was assessed by self-report using the Brief Symptom Checklist and by proxy-report through the Child Behavior Checklist. Independent of residence status, the self and proxy ratings reveal that more than half of the refugees suffer from increased levels of psychological distress, particularly from anxiety and somatisation. There was a moderate positive correlation between the total scales of the two instruments. The high number of clinically meaningful distress poses a great challenge to caseworkers in facilities for unaccompanied refugees. The Child Behavior Checklist can be a suitable measure to detect clinically meaningful problems, but its validity seems to depend on a good relationship between caseworker and refugee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在无人陪伴的难民中,自我和个案工作者代理的情感和行为困难报告之间的领域特定差异
本研究的目的是评估青少年难民的心理困扰,并检验个案工作者通过代理报告工具评估压力的可靠性。对102名16 - 21岁的德国青年福利收容所里的无人陪伴难民的痛苦进行了评估,采用简要症状检查表进行自我报告,并通过儿童行为检查表进行代理报告。与居住身份无关,自我和代理评级显示,超过一半的难民遭受着越来越严重的心理困扰,尤其是焦虑和躯体化。两种仪器的总量表之间存在适度的正相关。大量临床意义上的痛苦对无人陪伴难民设施的个案工作者构成了巨大的挑战。儿童行为检查表可以是一个合适的措施,以发现临床有意义的问题,但其有效性似乎取决于社会工作者和难民之间的良好关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES
EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DIFFICULTIES PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: The central intention of Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties (EBDs) is to contribute to readers" understanding of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties, and also their knowledge of appropriate ways of preventing and responding to EBDs, in terms of intervention and policy. The journal aims to cater for a wide audience, in response to the diverse nature of the professionals who work with and for children with EBDs.
期刊最新文献
‘Listen to our voice!’ using co-creation and art-based methods to explore the welfare and wellbeing of siblings of children with life-limiting conditions An online compassion-focused intervention for middle school students: the Inspiring Comfort program Navigating changes: reflecting on children and young people’s experiences of public health and social measures during the COVID-19 pandemic- a purposive, qualitative follow-up from a national probability sample A scoping review of the literature exploring and evaluating the emotional literacy support assistant (ELSA) intervention Teachers’ views on the sustainability of the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management programme: a one-year qualitative follow-up study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1