Anaplasia reflection in the future tense formation of the germanic languages

V. Bondarenko, Andriy Botsman, O. Dmytruk
{"title":"Anaplasia reflection in the future tense formation of the germanic languages","authors":"V. Bondarenko, Andriy Botsman, O. Dmytruk","doi":"10.17721/apultp.2022.45.65-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to separate grammatical structures that demonstrate the development of the future tense forms in the Germanic languages. The first step of research includes the identification of word forms for temporal description. Gradual identification of primitive analytical forms gives the possibility of tracing the gradual analytisation of the corresponding word combinations and their further transformation into stable analytical verb structures. Finding out latent features helps to recognize differentiated grammatical forms that are used to create and build the set of the formal Germanic future tense structures. The subject of the research is the components used to form temporal verb forms that project the action into the future. The Gothic language, which is understood as the initial, primary stage for the research, used forms of the present tense to describe the future action involving a phrase or an upper phrase context. Within the present tense forms a prefixal word-formation model was found. The Gothic optative was involved to render the future tense. The weak models of Gothic analytisation are connected with the infinitive phrase and auxiliary verb haban. Combination of auxiliary verbs with verbals (infinitive or participle I) were found in the North and West Germanic languages. These verb combinations involved a very restricted set of notional verbs used in two verbal forms. The first element of the phrase that falls under the process of future grammaticalization was preterite-present verbs, inchoative and some durative verbs. Stability of primary analytical temporal forms was created by using only two variants of verbals (infinitive or participle I). The first component of analytical temporal forms gradually lost its primary lexical meaning through its transformation into the auxiliary element. In the process of further differentiation of the Germanic languages some peculiarities were traced. The German language did not develop individual analytical forms with preterite-present (modal) verbs. Other West Germanic and Scandinavian languages used preterite-present (modal) verbs as a leading mechanism for temporal analytisation. Creation of analytical temporal forms happened within twofold formats.","PeriodicalId":34830,"journal":{"name":"Aktual''ni problemi ukrains''koi lingvistiki teoriia i praktika","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktual''ni problemi ukrains''koi lingvistiki teoriia i praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/apultp.2022.45.65-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to separate grammatical structures that demonstrate the development of the future tense forms in the Germanic languages. The first step of research includes the identification of word forms for temporal description. Gradual identification of primitive analytical forms gives the possibility of tracing the gradual analytisation of the corresponding word combinations and their further transformation into stable analytical verb structures. Finding out latent features helps to recognize differentiated grammatical forms that are used to create and build the set of the formal Germanic future tense structures. The subject of the research is the components used to form temporal verb forms that project the action into the future. The Gothic language, which is understood as the initial, primary stage for the research, used forms of the present tense to describe the future action involving a phrase or an upper phrase context. Within the present tense forms a prefixal word-formation model was found. The Gothic optative was involved to render the future tense. The weak models of Gothic analytisation are connected with the infinitive phrase and auxiliary verb haban. Combination of auxiliary verbs with verbals (infinitive or participle I) were found in the North and West Germanic languages. These verb combinations involved a very restricted set of notional verbs used in two verbal forms. The first element of the phrase that falls under the process of future grammaticalization was preterite-present verbs, inchoative and some durative verbs. Stability of primary analytical temporal forms was created by using only two variants of verbals (infinitive or participle I). The first component of analytical temporal forms gradually lost its primary lexical meaning through its transformation into the auxiliary element. In the process of further differentiation of the Germanic languages some peculiarities were traced. The German language did not develop individual analytical forms with preterite-present (modal) verbs. Other West Germanic and Scandinavian languages used preterite-present (modal) verbs as a leading mechanism for temporal analytisation. Creation of analytical temporal forms happened within twofold formats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日耳曼语将来时构象中的不发育现象
本文的目的是将日耳曼语言中将来时形式发展的语法结构分开。研究的第一步包括识别用于时态描述的词形。对原始分析形式的逐渐识别,可以对相应的词组合进行逐步分析,并进一步转化为稳定的分析动词结构。发现潜在的特征有助于识别用于创建和构建正式日耳曼将来时结构集的不同语法形式。本研究的主题是用来构成将动作投射到未来的时态动词形式的成分。哥特语被理解为研究的初始、初级阶段,它使用现在时的形式来描述涉及短语或上部短语上下文的未来动作。在现在时形式中发现了前缀构词模式。哥特选择词用来表示将来时。哥特语分析的弱模式与不定式短语和助动词haban有关。助动词与动词(不定式或分词I)的组合在北日耳曼语和西日耳曼语中发现。这些动词组合包含一组非常有限的概念动词,以两种动词形式使用。在未来语法化过程中,短语的第一个元素是一般现在时动词、初始动词和一些进行时动词。主要分析时态形式的稳定性是通过只使用两种动词变体(不定式或分词I)来创造的。分析时态形式的第一个组成部分通过转化为辅助元素逐渐失去了其主要的词汇意义。在日耳曼语进一步分化的过程中,人们发现了日耳曼语的一些特点。德语没有发展出带有一般现在时(情态)动词的单独分析形式。其他西日耳曼语和斯堪的纳维亚语使用一般现在时(情态)动词作为时间分析的主要机制。分析时态形式的创造有两种形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Terminology of modern media linguistics in interdisciplinary contacts Communicative invariants of edutainment: linguostylistics of lifehack genre Legitimation by naturalization in the news: mechanism, techniques and linguistic means Linguistic imagelogy: research potential Сrisis communications in the information space of wartime Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1