Glycemic Index of Some Traditional Fruits in Jamaica

Ryan D. Francis, P. Bahado-Singh, A. Smith, A. Wheatley, H. Asemota
{"title":"Glycemic Index of Some Traditional Fruits in Jamaica","authors":"Ryan D. Francis, P. Bahado-Singh, A. Smith, A. Wheatley, H. Asemota","doi":"10.21767/2248-9215.100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fruits and vegetables, for their complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber and micronutrients, should form an essential part of every diet. In order to give good dietary advice to diabetic patients, it is necessary to know the glycemic index of foods commonly consumed locally. The objective of this study was to determine the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of commonly available and consumed June plum (Spondias dulcis), Otaheite apple (Syzygium malaccense), Pineapple (Ananas comosus), and Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in Jamaica. Methods: Ten (10) healthy Jamaican subjects (5 males, 5 females) with mean age 30 ± 2 years and mean BMI 25 ± 1 kg/m2 were recruited to the study. Using a non-blind, crossover design trial, the subjects consumed 50 (or 25) grams of available carbohydrate portions of glucose (standard food) and test foods after an overnight fast. Their serum glucose levels were then determined at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the consumption of each test food. Glucose was tested on three separate occasions, and the test foods once. The GI value was calculated geometrically by expressing the incremental area under the blood glucose curve (IAUC) for the test foods as a percentage of each subject's average IAUC for the standard food. Results: The results indicated that the IAUC for Pineapple (96 ± 15) and Otaheite apple (122 ± 29) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of June plum (23 ± 6) and Cucumber (40 ± 14). Similarly the GI of Pineapple (80 ± 20) and Otaheite apple (64 ± 15) were significantly higher than June plum (13 ± 5) and Cucumber (21 ± 6). Conclusion: June plum, Cucumber, were shown to have low glycemic index values, whereas Otaheite apple was intermediate and Pineapple high.","PeriodicalId":12012,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21767/2248-9215.100056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Fruits and vegetables, for their complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber and micronutrients, should form an essential part of every diet. In order to give good dietary advice to diabetic patients, it is necessary to know the glycemic index of foods commonly consumed locally. The objective of this study was to determine the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of commonly available and consumed June plum (Spondias dulcis), Otaheite apple (Syzygium malaccense), Pineapple (Ananas comosus), and Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) in Jamaica. Methods: Ten (10) healthy Jamaican subjects (5 males, 5 females) with mean age 30 ± 2 years and mean BMI 25 ± 1 kg/m2 were recruited to the study. Using a non-blind, crossover design trial, the subjects consumed 50 (or 25) grams of available carbohydrate portions of glucose (standard food) and test foods after an overnight fast. Their serum glucose levels were then determined at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the consumption of each test food. Glucose was tested on three separate occasions, and the test foods once. The GI value was calculated geometrically by expressing the incremental area under the blood glucose curve (IAUC) for the test foods as a percentage of each subject's average IAUC for the standard food. Results: The results indicated that the IAUC for Pineapple (96 ± 15) and Otaheite apple (122 ± 29) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of June plum (23 ± 6) and Cucumber (40 ± 14). Similarly the GI of Pineapple (80 ± 20) and Otaheite apple (64 ± 15) were significantly higher than June plum (13 ± 5) and Cucumber (21 ± 6). Conclusion: June plum, Cucumber, were shown to have low glycemic index values, whereas Otaheite apple was intermediate and Pineapple high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙买加一些传统水果的血糖指数
背景:水果和蔬菜含有复杂的碳水化合物、膳食纤维和微量营养素,应成为每一种饮食的重要组成部分。为了给糖尿病患者提供良好的饮食建议,有必要了解当地经常食用的食物的血糖指数。本研究的目的是测定牙买加常见和食用的六月梅(Spondias dulcis)、奥塔黑特苹果(Syzygium malaccense)、菠萝(Ananas comosus)和黄瓜(Cucumis sativus)的血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)。方法:招募10名健康的牙买加人(男5名,女5名),平均年龄30±2岁,平均BMI为25±1 kg/m2。采用非盲交叉设计试验,受试者在禁食一夜后消耗50(或25)克可用碳水化合物部分的葡萄糖(标准食物)和测试食物。然后在食用每种测试食物后0、15、30、45、60、90和120分钟测定他们的血清葡萄糖水平。葡萄糖测试分三次进行,食物测试一次。GI值是通过将测试食品的血糖曲线下增量面积(IAUC)表示为每个受试者对标准食品的平均IAUC的百分比来几何计算的。结果:菠萝(96±15)和奥塔黑特苹果(122±29)的IAUC显著高于六月李(23±6)和黄瓜(40±14)(p < 0.05)。菠萝的GI值为80±20,苹果的GI值为64±15,明显高于六月李(13±5)和黄瓜(21±6)。结论:六月李为黄瓜低血糖指数,而六月李为中等,菠萝为高血糖指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Histochemical Effects of Aloe Vera Gel (Aloe Barbadensis Miller) on Puncture-Induced Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Rabbits Tetralogy of Fallot: Origins, Management and Outcomes Profiling the Nitrogen Efficiency Using Agricultural Engineering Technique of YARA ALS Tractor Senso Pollen Variations among some Cultivated Citrus Species and its Related Genera in Egypt Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (Btk) Inhibitor Tirabrutinib Prevents the Development of Murine Lupus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1