Suciani Latif, Uman Suherman AS, M. Supriatna, I. Ilfiandra
{"title":"Developing A Cultural Intelligence Instrument for Guidance and Counseling Teachers","authors":"Suciani Latif, Uman Suherman AS, M. Supriatna, I. Ilfiandra","doi":"10.26858/est.v8i1.19653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The study aimed to produce a self-report instrument using a cultural intelligence scale for Guidance and Counseling teachers. It employed Research and Development design adopting the model of Adam and Wieman (2011). Operationally, the development of the instrument was divided into five stages, 1) determining the question format; 2) determining the question construction; 3) determining the guidance of assessment, expert judgment, and revision of the question; 4) expert judgment by the experts of culture and instrument development; and 5) analyzing instrument using the Rasch model. Data analysis showed that in the development of cultural intelligence instrument: 1) the instrument construct was correctly determined, and it could measure one variable of Guidance and Counseling teachers' cultural understanding; 2) there were five items of cultural intelligence instrument categorized as very difficult and five items were in the very easy category; 3) all items of cultural intelligence instrument of Guidance and Counseling teachers were fit, meaning that it functioned normal, could be understood by the Guidance and Counseling teachers, and can measure what it should measure; and 4) The Cronbach Alpha was 0,96, indicating that the instrument was in the Very Good category with the Person Reliability of 0,92 and Item Reliability of 0,99. Therefore, based on the Rasch model analysis, the cultural intelligence instrument of Guidance and Counseling teachers, which was developed, had fulfilled the set standard and Good criteria, and it could be used to collect data about the cultural intelligence of Guidance and Counseling teachers.","PeriodicalId":32068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EST Educational Science And Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EST Educational Science And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v8i1.19653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract. The study aimed to produce a self-report instrument using a cultural intelligence scale for Guidance and Counseling teachers. It employed Research and Development design adopting the model of Adam and Wieman (2011). Operationally, the development of the instrument was divided into five stages, 1) determining the question format; 2) determining the question construction; 3) determining the guidance of assessment, expert judgment, and revision of the question; 4) expert judgment by the experts of culture and instrument development; and 5) analyzing instrument using the Rasch model. Data analysis showed that in the development of cultural intelligence instrument: 1) the instrument construct was correctly determined, and it could measure one variable of Guidance and Counseling teachers' cultural understanding; 2) there were five items of cultural intelligence instrument categorized as very difficult and five items were in the very easy category; 3) all items of cultural intelligence instrument of Guidance and Counseling teachers were fit, meaning that it functioned normal, could be understood by the Guidance and Counseling teachers, and can measure what it should measure; and 4) The Cronbach Alpha was 0,96, indicating that the instrument was in the Very Good category with the Person Reliability of 0,92 and Item Reliability of 0,99. Therefore, based on the Rasch model analysis, the cultural intelligence instrument of Guidance and Counseling teachers, which was developed, had fulfilled the set standard and Good criteria, and it could be used to collect data about the cultural intelligence of Guidance and Counseling teachers.
摘要本研究旨在使用文化智力量表为辅导教师制作一种自我报告工具。采用Adam and Wieman(2011)模型进行研发设计。在操作上,该仪器的开发分为五个阶段:1)确定问题格式;2)确定问题结构;3)确定评估指导、专家判断和问题修正;4)由培养和仪器开发专家进行专家判断;5)采用Rasch模型的分析仪器。数据分析表明,在文化智力量表的开发过程中:1)正确确定了量表结构,能够测量辅导教师文化理解的一个变量;(2)文化智力测验中有5个题项为极难题项,5个题项为极易题项;(3)辅导教师文化智力量表各项指标均达到适宜性,即功能正常,能被辅导教师理解,能测量该测量的内容;4) Cronbach Alpha为0.96,表明该仪器属于非常好的类别,个人信度为0.92,项目信度为0.99。因此,在Rasch模型分析的基础上,开发的辅导教师文化智力测试仪满足了set标准和Good标准,可以用来收集辅导教师文化智力的数据。