Central European MEPs and Their Roles: Behavioral Strategies in the European Parliament

Q3 Social Sciences World Political Science Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI:10.1515/wps-2016-0004
András Bíró-Nagy
{"title":"Central European MEPs and Their Roles: Behavioral Strategies in the European Parliament","authors":"András Bíró-Nagy","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article helps to better understand the role orientations of the Central European Members of the European Parliament, the factors that influence their strategies, and the relationship between their roles and activities. Based on the results of a quantitative survey research with MEPs from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia in the 2009–2014 term, I argue that it is possible to explain the political roles of MEPs by their attitudes towards politics and policy, and the territorial focus of representation (European vs. national level). Due to the internal mechanisms of the EP and its position in the multi-level governance system of European politics, these two dimensions represent dilemmas that all MEPs face, when it comes to the efficient use of their scarce resources: time and energy. This study demonstrates that socio-demographic factors, attitudes and political socialization all have an influence on what roles MEPs choose. The time spent in the EP, age, previous political experience, party affiliation, left-right self-definition and career ambitions are all important factors that can explain the political behavior of MEPs. The Central European MEPs’ focus on politics vs. policy and the European vs. national political arena have different roots, and different variables explain them. Orientation towards politics and policy largely depends on previous political experience and future career ambitions. Focus on the European or the national level is best explained by age, party affiliation and left-right self-definition.","PeriodicalId":37883,"journal":{"name":"World Political Science","volume":"72 1","pages":"147 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/wps-2016-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This article helps to better understand the role orientations of the Central European Members of the European Parliament, the factors that influence their strategies, and the relationship between their roles and activities. Based on the results of a quantitative survey research with MEPs from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia in the 2009–2014 term, I argue that it is possible to explain the political roles of MEPs by their attitudes towards politics and policy, and the territorial focus of representation (European vs. national level). Due to the internal mechanisms of the EP and its position in the multi-level governance system of European politics, these two dimensions represent dilemmas that all MEPs face, when it comes to the efficient use of their scarce resources: time and energy. This study demonstrates that socio-demographic factors, attitudes and political socialization all have an influence on what roles MEPs choose. The time spent in the EP, age, previous political experience, party affiliation, left-right self-definition and career ambitions are all important factors that can explain the political behavior of MEPs. The Central European MEPs’ focus on politics vs. policy and the European vs. national political arena have different roots, and different variables explain them. Orientation towards politics and policy largely depends on previous political experience and future career ambitions. Focus on the European or the national level is best explained by age, party affiliation and left-right self-definition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中欧欧洲议会议员及其角色:欧洲议会的行为策略
本文有助于更好地了解欧洲议会中欧成员的角色定位,影响其战略的因素,以及他们的角色与活动之间的关系。基于对来自捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚的欧洲议会议员在2009-2014年任期内的定量调查研究结果,我认为可以通过他们对政治和政策的态度以及代表的地域焦点(欧洲与国家层面)来解释欧洲议会议员的政治角色。由于欧洲议会的内部机制及其在欧洲政治多层次治理体系中的地位,这两个维度代表了所有欧洲议会议员在有效利用其稀缺资源(时间和精力)时所面临的困境。本研究表明,社会人口因素、态度和政治社会化都对议员角色选择有影响。在欧洲议会任职的时间、年龄、以往的政治经历、党派关系、左右自我定义和职业抱负都是解释欧洲议会议员政治行为的重要因素。中欧议会议员对政治与政策、欧洲与国家政治舞台的关注有着不同的根源,不同的变量可以解释它们。对政治和政策的倾向在很大程度上取决于以前的政治经验和未来的职业抱负。对欧洲或国家层面的关注最好用年龄、党派关系和左右自我定义来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Political Science
World Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: World Political Science (WPS) publishes translations of prize-winning articles nominated by prominent national political science associations and journals around the world. Scholars in a field as international as political science need to know about important political research produced outside the English-speaking world. Sponsored by the International Political Science Association (IPSA), the premiere global political science organization with membership from national assoications 50 countries worldwide WPS gathers together and translates an ever-increasing number of countries'' best political science articles, bridging the language barriers that have made this cutting-edge research inaccessible up to now. Articles in the World Political Science cover a wide range of subjects of interest to readers concerned with the systematic analysis of political issues facing national, sub-national and international governments and societies. Fields include Comparative Politics, International Relations, Political Sociology, Political Theory, Political Economy, and Public Administration and Policy. Anyone interested in the central issues of the day, whether they are students, policy makers, or other citizens, will benefit from greater familiarity with debates about the nature and solutions to social, economic and political problems carried on in non-English language forums.
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter The National Strategy for Inner Areas: Innovation, Policy Transfer and Post-Earthquake Reconstruction “Listen, Marxist!”: On the Forgotten Past of Self-Management and the Contemporary Orgasms of History Frontmatter A Rising Tide that Lifts no Boats. The European Union and the Development of the Transnational Economy of Crimigration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1