Articulating Grounded Theory Methodology for Public and Nonprofit Administration Scholars and Practitioners

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Perspectives on Public Management and Governance Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.1093/ppmgov/gvac018
Joseph A. Hafer, Jessica Kitchens
{"title":"Articulating Grounded Theory Methodology for Public and Nonprofit Administration Scholars and Practitioners","authors":"Joseph A. Hafer, Jessica Kitchens","doi":"10.1093/ppmgov/gvac018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Grounded theory as a term and as a methodology has received increasing attention from public administration scholars since the mid-2000s. Unfortunately, the application of grounded theory methodology across social science research—including public and nonprofit administration—is often shrouded in vagueness; however, rigorously conducted grounded theory research, particularly classic ground theory, holds great potential to develop theory that is relevant to practice. This article seeks to provide clarity on grounded theory methodology by detailing it through the lens of classic grounded theory methodology (i.e., the foundational methodology). Additionally, the authors examine the interpretation and application of grounded theory methodology through a conceptual content analysis of top public administration journals. The analysis reveals scholars either do not have a clear understanding of grounded theory methodology or needs to improve their reporting of such, as the theory development process is not clearly reported. Insight on directions forward to improve the rigor of grounded theory research in the field is offered, including adhering to established methodology.","PeriodicalId":29947,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grounded theory as a term and as a methodology has received increasing attention from public administration scholars since the mid-2000s. Unfortunately, the application of grounded theory methodology across social science research—including public and nonprofit administration—is often shrouded in vagueness; however, rigorously conducted grounded theory research, particularly classic ground theory, holds great potential to develop theory that is relevant to practice. This article seeks to provide clarity on grounded theory methodology by detailing it through the lens of classic grounded theory methodology (i.e., the foundational methodology). Additionally, the authors examine the interpretation and application of grounded theory methodology through a conceptual content analysis of top public administration journals. The analysis reveals scholars either do not have a clear understanding of grounded theory methodology or needs to improve their reporting of such, as the theory development process is not clearly reported. Insight on directions forward to improve the rigor of grounded theory research in the field is offered, including adhering to established methodology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为公共和非营利管理学者和实践者阐明扎根的理论方法
自2000年代中期以来,扎根理论作为一个术语和一种方法论越来越受到公共行政学者的关注。不幸的是,扎根理论方法论在社会科学研究中的应用——包括公共和非营利管理——常常被模糊所笼罩;然而,严谨的理论研究,特别是经典的理论研究,具有发展与实践相关的理论的巨大潜力。本文试图通过经典扎根理论方法论(即基础方法论)的视角来详细阐述扎根理论方法论,从而提供清晰的基础理论方法论。此外,作者还通过对顶级公共管理期刊的概念内容分析,考察了扎根理论方法论的解释和应用。分析表明,学者们对扎根理论方法论的认识不够清晰,或者对扎根理论方法论的报道还有待改进,对理论发展过程的报道不够清晰。提出了提高该领域基础理论研究严谨性的方向,包括坚持既定的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
What Is The Public? A Pragmatic Analysis of a Core Concept in Public Administration The Flawed Foundations of Social Equity in Public Administration: A Racial Contract Theory Critique The Procedural Politicking Tug of War: Law-Versus-Management Disputes in Contexts of Democratic Backsliding Producing Agreements and Innovations in Collaborative Governance Political Transactions, the Social Contract, and Administrative Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1