Animal Models in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Research: Pros and Cons

Zainab Zakaria, Mousa Numan Ahmad, N. Qinna
{"title":"Animal Models in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Research: Pros and Cons","authors":"Zainab Zakaria, Mousa Numan Ahmad, N. Qinna","doi":"10.35516/jjas.v17i4.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) continues to rise at an alarmingly high rate, constituting one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Research is central to the investigation, creation, and design of new therapeutic approaches for T2DM. For this purpose, and because not many tests can be conducted on humans; so, animal models are the only currently available alternative. This article discusses the pros and cons of different animal models used in T2DM research. PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, ADI, and WHO databases were searched through June 2021. Mice and rats are the most widely used models for diabetes studies. Many other animals are also used, such as pigs and non-human primates. Animal models develop diabetes either spontaneously or by using chemical toxins, such as streptozotocin and alloxan, or by surgical or genetic techniques and depict clinical features or related phenotypes of the disease. Although their importance is generally accepted, animal models are criticized for their poor accuracy in predicting human outcomes due to the low rate of translation between preclinical and clinical studies. However, this problem is partly explained by inadequate methodologies and designs in animal trials. It remains to emphasize that animal models add an indispensable value to the basic, clinical, and applied science of T2DM by opening new avenues of research and innovation. \n ","PeriodicalId":14707,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v17i4.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Worldwide, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) continues to rise at an alarmingly high rate, constituting one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Research is central to the investigation, creation, and design of new therapeutic approaches for T2DM. For this purpose, and because not many tests can be conducted on humans; so, animal models are the only currently available alternative. This article discusses the pros and cons of different animal models used in T2DM research. PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, ADI, and WHO databases were searched through June 2021. Mice and rats are the most widely used models for diabetes studies. Many other animals are also used, such as pigs and non-human primates. Animal models develop diabetes either spontaneously or by using chemical toxins, such as streptozotocin and alloxan, or by surgical or genetic techniques and depict clinical features or related phenotypes of the disease. Although their importance is generally accepted, animal models are criticized for their poor accuracy in predicting human outcomes due to the low rate of translation between preclinical and clinical studies. However, this problem is partly explained by inadequate methodologies and designs in animal trials. It remains to emphasize that animal models add an indispensable value to the basic, clinical, and applied science of T2DM by opening new avenues of research and innovation.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病动物模型研究:利弊
在世界范围内,2型糖尿病(T2DM)的患病率继续以惊人的速度上升,是导致死亡和发病的主要原因之一。研究是调查、创造和设计T2DM新治疗方法的核心。为此目的,也因为没有多少试验可以在人体上进行;因此,动物模型是目前唯一可用的替代方法。本文讨论了用于T2DM研究的不同动物模型的优缺点。检索PubMed、Medline、Science Direct、ADI和WHO数据库至2021年6月。小鼠和大鼠是糖尿病研究中最广泛使用的模型。许多其他动物也被使用,如猪和非人类灵长类动物。动物模型自发地或通过使用化学毒素,如链脲佐菌素和四氧嘧啶,或通过手术或遗传技术发展为糖尿病,并描绘该疾病的临床特征或相关表型。尽管动物模型的重要性被普遍接受,但由于临床前和临床研究之间的转换率较低,动物模型在预测人类结果方面的准确性较差,因此受到批评。然而,这个问题的部分原因是动物试验的方法和设计不充分。仍然需要强调的是,动物模型通过开辟新的研究和创新途径,为T2DM的基础、临床和应用科学增加了不可或缺的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Water Management in Jordan: A Fresh Tomato Water Footprint Analysis Evaluating the Performance of the AquaCrop Model to Soil Salinity in Jordan Valley Evaluating the Performance of the AquaCrop Model to Soil Salinity in Jordan Valley Chemical and Functional Properties of Mahlab Tree (Prunus mahaleb) Exudate Gum Replacement of Cheesecloth with Polyamide Plastic Micro-filters in the Manufacturing of Fresh White Boiled Cheese and Pasteurized White Brined Cheese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1