The impact of digital technologies on the activities of law professionals and authorized mediators

Iurie Mihalache, Constantin Mihalescu
{"title":"The impact of digital technologies on the activities of law professionals and authorized mediators","authors":"Iurie Mihalache, Constantin Mihalescu","doi":"10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digitalization of the public system and, implicitly, of the justice system have been accelerated by the appearance of the Covid-19 virus. Legal professionals: judges, prosecutors, lawyers, legal advisers, bailiffs, mediators, etc., took full advantage of this facility offered by the digitalization tool. According to the agreement on the text of the Council’s conclusions draft regarding “Access to justice - capitalizing on the opportunities offered by digitalization” considering the reunion on 7th October 2020, the use of artificial intelligence tools should not affect the decision-making power of judges, nor the judicial independence. A legal decision must always be carried out by a human being and cannot be delegated to an artificial intelligence instrument”. We consider, thus, that the person who interprets a text of law must have a balanced approach, so as not to exceed the limits, and the law must be interpreted both in the letter and in its spirit. In order to be able to interpret the law in its spirit, that person must possess a true civic education integrating a multitude of disciplines. The evolution of current education tends to rather create individuals lacking a real civic education, fact which would lead, implicitly, to the training of individuals unable to pay due attention to the spirit of a legal act. Disadvantaged in this regard will be lawyers and mediators, in general, as they have to deal with situations involving a high dose of subjectivism.","PeriodicalId":83195,"journal":{"name":"The National law journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52388/1811-0770.2021.3(245).06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digitalization of the public system and, implicitly, of the justice system have been accelerated by the appearance of the Covid-19 virus. Legal professionals: judges, prosecutors, lawyers, legal advisers, bailiffs, mediators, etc., took full advantage of this facility offered by the digitalization tool. According to the agreement on the text of the Council’s conclusions draft regarding “Access to justice - capitalizing on the opportunities offered by digitalization” considering the reunion on 7th October 2020, the use of artificial intelligence tools should not affect the decision-making power of judges, nor the judicial independence. A legal decision must always be carried out by a human being and cannot be delegated to an artificial intelligence instrument”. We consider, thus, that the person who interprets a text of law must have a balanced approach, so as not to exceed the limits, and the law must be interpreted both in the letter and in its spirit. In order to be able to interpret the law in its spirit, that person must possess a true civic education integrating a multitude of disciplines. The evolution of current education tends to rather create individuals lacking a real civic education, fact which would lead, implicitly, to the training of individuals unable to pay due attention to the spirit of a legal act. Disadvantaged in this regard will be lawyers and mediators, in general, as they have to deal with situations involving a high dose of subjectivism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字技术对法律专业人员和授权调解员活动的影响
Covid-19病毒的出现加速了公共系统以及司法系统的数字化。法律专业人员:法官、检察官、律师、法律顾问、法警、调解员等,充分利用了数字化工具提供的这一便利。根据理事会关于“诉诸司法——利用数字化提供的机会”结论草案案文的协议,考虑到2020年10月7日的聚会,人工智能工具的使用不应影响法官的决策权,也不应影响司法独立。法律决定必须始终由人类执行,不能委托给人工智能工具。”因此,我们认为,解释法律文本的人必须采取一种平衡的方法,以免超出限制,并且必须从文字和精神上解释法律。为了能够从精神上解释法律,这个人必须拥有真正的公民教育,包括众多学科。当前教育的演变倾向于创造出缺乏真正公民教育的个人,这一事实将含蓄地导致培养出无法对法律行为的精神给予应有注意的个人。一般来说,律师和调解人在这方面处于不利地位,因为他们必须处理涉及高度主观主义的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aggravating circumstances of the crime of disclosure of state secret Strategies and tactics for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia through the prism of international law Contesting the conclusion of the rejection of the application for lifting the exception of unconstitutionality: the attitude of the Constitutional Court Protection of honor, dignity and business reputation of citizens in international law Translation of legal language and the problem of equivalence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1