Dementia in People with Severe/Profound Intellectual (and Multiple) Disabilities: Applicability of Items in Dementia Screening Instruments for People with Intellectual Disabilities

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.1080/19315864.2022.2111737
Maureen B. G. Wissing, Roos Dijkstra, Ina A. van der Wal, Esther S. Grootendorst, J. Hobbelen, A. V. D. van der Putten, P. D. de Deyn, A. Waninge, A. Dekker
{"title":"Dementia in People with Severe/Profound Intellectual (and Multiple) Disabilities: Applicability of Items in Dementia Screening Instruments for People with Intellectual Disabilities","authors":"Maureen B. G. Wissing, Roos Dijkstra, Ina A. van der Wal, Esther S. Grootendorst, J. Hobbelen, A. V. D. van der Putten, P. D. de Deyn, A. Waninge, A. Dekker","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2022.2111737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Diagnosing dementia in people with severe/profound intellectual (and multiple) disabilities (SPI(M)D) is complex. Whereas existing dementia screening instruments as a whole are unsuitable for this population, a number of individual items may apply. Therefore, this study aimed to identify applicable items in existing dementia screening instruments. Methods Informant interviews about 40 people with SPI(M)D were conducted to identify applicable items in the Dementia Scale for Down Syndrome, Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Down Syndrome II scale, Dementia Questionnaire for persons with Mental Retardation and Social competence Rating scale for people with Intellectual Disabilities. Results Among 193 items, 101 items were found applicable, categorized in 5 domains: behavioral and psychological functioning (60 items), cognitive functioning (25), motor functioning (6), activities of daily living (5) and medical comorbidities (5). Conclusion Identifying applicable items for people with SPI(M)D is an essential step in developing a dedicated dementia screening instrument for this population.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"23 1","pages":"322 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2022.2111737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Diagnosing dementia in people with severe/profound intellectual (and multiple) disabilities (SPI(M)D) is complex. Whereas existing dementia screening instruments as a whole are unsuitable for this population, a number of individual items may apply. Therefore, this study aimed to identify applicable items in existing dementia screening instruments. Methods Informant interviews about 40 people with SPI(M)D were conducted to identify applicable items in the Dementia Scale for Down Syndrome, Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Down Syndrome II scale, Dementia Questionnaire for persons with Mental Retardation and Social competence Rating scale for people with Intellectual Disabilities. Results Among 193 items, 101 items were found applicable, categorized in 5 domains: behavioral and psychological functioning (60 items), cognitive functioning (25), motor functioning (6), activities of daily living (5) and medical comorbidities (5). Conclusion Identifying applicable items for people with SPI(M)D is an essential step in developing a dedicated dementia screening instrument for this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重度/深度智力(及多重)残疾者的痴呆:智力残疾者痴呆筛查工具项目的适用性
诊断严重/深度智力(和多重)残疾(SPI(M)D)患者的痴呆是复杂的。虽然现有的痴呆症筛查工具整体上不适合这一人群,但一些单独的项目可能适用。因此,本研究旨在确定现有痴呆筛查工具中适用的项目。方法对40例SPI(M)D患者进行问卷调查,确定《唐氏综合征痴呆量表》、《唐氏综合征II型痴呆行为与心理症状量表》、《智障人士痴呆问卷》和《智障人士社会能力评定量表》中适用的项目。结果在193个项目中,发现101个项目适用,分为5个领域:行为和心理功能(60个)、认知功能(25个)、运动功能(6个)、日常生活活动(5个)和医学合并症(5个)。结论确定适用于SPI(M)D患者的项目是开发专门针对该人群的痴呆症筛查工具的重要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Mental Functions in People with Mild Intellectual Disability to Borderline Intellectual Functioning Personal Growth Among Parents of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychopathology: The Role of Social Support and Attitudes Toward Service Use Clinical Opinion: Differences in Addressing Needs of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities for In-Person and Digital Psychotherapy Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1