ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE POLICY IN AFRICA: THE RIVALRY BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Millennium - Journal of International Studies Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.32890/jis2023.19.2.7
Sigit Sigit, Nadya Carollina, Jefferson Winata Bachtiar
{"title":"ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE POLICY IN AFRICA: THE RIVALRY BETWEEN CHINA AND JAPAN","authors":"Sigit Sigit, Nadya Carollina, Jefferson Winata Bachtiar","doi":"10.32890/jis2023.19.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the China and Japan rivalry on economic assistance policy in Africa using a qualitative method and nationalinterest as the conceptual framework. The land of Africa has abundant reserves of natural resources, such as dense forestry andmineral resources which naturally will attract foreign investors. The first foreign investors in Africa were westerners. Within the grip oftheir iron fists, Africa experienced a bitter history of slavery and colonialization. This rooted problem remains unresolved and causesa significant political atrophy until this day, and has resulted in the incapability of the Africa nations to resolve their own respectiveproblems. Given such a state of affairs, these former colonies in Africa have always been longing for foreign assistance, especiallyafter the post-Cold War Era. Thus, the abandonment of former colonies gave the opportunity for the Eastern powers, such Chinaand Japan to establish a foothold in Africa, namely Japan with its Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD)and China its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Through the TICAD, Japan emphasizes the importance of “Africa’s Ownership” in all itsinfrastructure development cooperation initiatives. On the other hand, Chinese assistance can be characterised as indiscriminate, reciprocal, and non-interference in internal affairs. This paper suggests that both China and Japan have their own respective agenda on how to conduct diplomacy in Africa. They even share the same goals vis-a-vis Africa, which are economic and political domination and a keen interest in exploiting the available natural energy resources. ","PeriodicalId":18593,"journal":{"name":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2023.19.2.7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the China and Japan rivalry on economic assistance policy in Africa using a qualitative method and nationalinterest as the conceptual framework. The land of Africa has abundant reserves of natural resources, such as dense forestry andmineral resources which naturally will attract foreign investors. The first foreign investors in Africa were westerners. Within the grip oftheir iron fists, Africa experienced a bitter history of slavery and colonialization. This rooted problem remains unresolved and causesa significant political atrophy until this day, and has resulted in the incapability of the Africa nations to resolve their own respectiveproblems. Given such a state of affairs, these former colonies in Africa have always been longing for foreign assistance, especiallyafter the post-Cold War Era. Thus, the abandonment of former colonies gave the opportunity for the Eastern powers, such Chinaand Japan to establish a foothold in Africa, namely Japan with its Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD)and China its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Through the TICAD, Japan emphasizes the importance of “Africa’s Ownership” in all itsinfrastructure development cooperation initiatives. On the other hand, Chinese assistance can be characterised as indiscriminate, reciprocal, and non-interference in internal affairs. This paper suggests that both China and Japan have their own respective agenda on how to conduct diplomacy in Africa. They even share the same goals vis-a-vis Africa, which are economic and political domination and a keen interest in exploiting the available natural energy resources. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲经济援助政策:中日之争
本文以国家利益为概念框架,采用定性方法分析中日两国在非洲经济援助政策上的竞争。非洲拥有丰富的自然资源,如茂密的森林和矿产资源,自然会吸引外国投资者。非洲的第一批外国投资者是西方人。在他们的铁腕统治下,非洲经历了奴役和殖民的痛苦历史。这一根深蒂固的问题至今仍未得到解决,造成严重的政治萎缩,并导致非洲国家无法解决各自的问题。在这种情况下,这些非洲前殖民地一直渴望得到外国援助,特别是在后冷战时代之后。因此,放弃前殖民地为中国和日本等东方大国在非洲建立立足点提供了机会,即日本通过其东京非洲发展国际会议(TICAD)和中国的“一带一路”倡议(BRI)。通过TICAD,日本在其所有基础设施发展合作倡议中强调“非洲自主”的重要性。另一方面,中国的援助可以被描述为不分青红皂白、互惠互利和不干涉内政。本文认为,中日两国都有各自的非洲外交议程。他们甚至对非洲有着相同的目标,即经济和政治统治以及对开发现有自然能源的强烈兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Contending American Visions of North Korea: The Mission Civilisatrice versus Realpolitik Affect, Aesthetics, and Sovereign Attachments The Violence of Settler Imperialism – and Why the Concept of Coloniality Cannot Grasp It The Affective Economies of Sovereignty: Desire and Identification The International Turn in Far-Right Studies: A Critical Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1