Measuring Mothers’ Warmth: Naïve Observers, Trained Coders, and Self-Reports

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Parenting-Science and Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15295192.2021.2004076
Cecilia Cheung, D. Delany
{"title":"Measuring Mothers’ Warmth: Naïve Observers, Trained Coders, and Self-Reports","authors":"Cecilia Cheung, D. Delany","doi":"10.1080/15295192.2021.2004076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPSIS Objective. The current research evaluated whether thin slicing, which involves brief observations of others’ behaviors, is useful in understanding maternal warmth in the context of mother-child interaction. Design. The extent to which naïve observers’ ratings based on brief observations correspond to other reports of maternal warmth as well as the predictive validity of such ratings were evaluated in 158 pairs of European American mothers and their early adolescent children engaged in a set of problem-solving activities in the laboratory. Naïve (untrained) observers provided ratings of mothers’ warmth based on the first 5 min of the dyadic interaction. Trained coders rated mothers’ behaviors based on the first 5 min as well as the full 15 min video using a behavioral coding system. Mothers and children reported on mothers’ warmth using surveys. Results. Naïve observers’ ratings were associated with trained coders’ ratings, but not with child or mother reports. Child reports of mothers’ warmth were associated with both subjective and objective measures of their academic functioning. Naïve observers’ ratings of mothers’ warmth were associated with an objective measure of children’s academic functioning. Conclusions. The correspondence between naïve observers’ and trained coders’ reports of mothers’ warmth warrants further investigation into the conditions under which less time- and labor-intensive methods, such as thin slicing, can be applied to assess parents’ expressive behaviors.","PeriodicalId":47432,"journal":{"name":"Parenting-Science and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parenting-Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2021.2004076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Objective. The current research evaluated whether thin slicing, which involves brief observations of others’ behaviors, is useful in understanding maternal warmth in the context of mother-child interaction. Design. The extent to which naïve observers’ ratings based on brief observations correspond to other reports of maternal warmth as well as the predictive validity of such ratings were evaluated in 158 pairs of European American mothers and their early adolescent children engaged in a set of problem-solving activities in the laboratory. Naïve (untrained) observers provided ratings of mothers’ warmth based on the first 5 min of the dyadic interaction. Trained coders rated mothers’ behaviors based on the first 5 min as well as the full 15 min video using a behavioral coding system. Mothers and children reported on mothers’ warmth using surveys. Results. Naïve observers’ ratings were associated with trained coders’ ratings, but not with child or mother reports. Child reports of mothers’ warmth were associated with both subjective and objective measures of their academic functioning. Naïve observers’ ratings of mothers’ warmth were associated with an objective measure of children’s academic functioning. Conclusions. The correspondence between naïve observers’ and trained coders’ reports of mothers’ warmth warrants further investigation into the conditions under which less time- and labor-intensive methods, such as thin slicing, can be applied to assess parents’ expressive behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量母亲的温暖:Naïve观察者,训练有素的编码员和自我报告
大纲的目标。目前的研究评估了薄切片,包括对他人行为的简短观察,是否有助于在母子互动的背景下理解母亲的温暖。设计。在实验室中,158对欧美母亲和她们的青春期早期的孩子参与了一系列解决问题的活动,对naïve观察者基于简短观察得出的评分与其他关于母亲温暖的报告的对应程度以及这些评分的预测有效性进行了评估。Naïve(未受过训练的)观察者根据两人互动的前5分钟给出了母亲的温暖程度评分。训练有素的编码员根据前5分钟以及完整的15分钟视频,使用行为编码系统对母亲的行为进行评分。母亲和孩子通过调查报告了母亲的温暖程度。结果。Naïve观察者的评分与训练有素的编码员的评分有关,但与孩子或母亲的报告无关。孩子对母亲温暖程度的报告与他们学业能力的主观和客观测量都有关。Naïve观察者对母亲温暖程度的评价与儿童学业能力的客观衡量有关。结论。naïve观察者和训练有素的编码器关于母亲温暖的报告之间的一致性值得进一步研究,在哪些条件下,可以应用较少时间和劳动密集型的方法,如薄切片,来评估父母的表达行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Parenting: Science and Practice strives to promote the exchange of empirical findings, theoretical perspectives, and methodological approaches from all disciplines that help to define and advance theory, research, and practice in parenting, caregiving, and childrearing broadly construed. "Parenting" is interpreted to include biological parents and grandparents, adoptive parents, nonparental caregivers, and others, including infrahuman parents. Articles on parenting itself, antecedents of parenting, parenting effects on parents and on children, the multiple contexts of parenting, and parenting interventions and education are all welcome. The journal brings parenting to science and science to parenting.
期刊最新文献
Effects of a Baby Carrier Intervention on Fathers' Sensitivity, Involvement, and Hormonal Levels: Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study. Observations of Positive Parenting from Online Parent-Child Interactions at Age 1. Maternal Stress: The First 14 Months Postpartum Measuring Parenting Self-Efficacy from Pregnancy into Early Childhood: Longitudinal Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance Evaluation of a Couple- and Family-Based Intervention: Implications for the Fathering Vulnerability Hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1