Effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation in conjunction with cranial base release technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_60_20
R. Patra, B. Kanungo, S. Nazir, A. Abraham
{"title":"Effectiveness of thoracic spine manipulation in conjunction with cranial base release technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain","authors":"R. Patra, B. Kanungo, S. Nazir, A. Abraham","doi":"10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_60_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain originates from the neck and may radiate to the shoulder or base of the cranium and is often aggravated by anxiety, depression, soft-tissue strain, occupational activities, and poor posture. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of thoracic spine manipulation along with cranial base release technique to improve motion and alleviate pain in individuals suffering from mechanical neck pain. Materials and Methods: We recruited 60 individuals (male: 31 and female: 29) who were suffering from mechanical neck pain. The participants were randomly distributed into Groups A and B. Patients of Group A underwent conventional physiotherapy treatment, whereas patients of Group B patients underwent thoracic spine manipulation and cranial base release. Baseline range of motion and pain were evaluated before starting the treatment, and postintervention measures were obtained after the weeks of intervention. Results: All participants completed 2 weeks of treatment. Group A had shown better outcome in all the parameters than Group B. We observed that the pain and cervical range of motions of Group B patients were statistically significantly different from those of Group A patients (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Thoracic spine manipulation in conjunction with cranial base release technique is more effective in the management of pain and cervical range of motion compared to the conventional physiotherapy treatment.","PeriodicalId":16373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"93 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_60_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain originates from the neck and may radiate to the shoulder or base of the cranium and is often aggravated by anxiety, depression, soft-tissue strain, occupational activities, and poor posture. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of thoracic spine manipulation along with cranial base release technique to improve motion and alleviate pain in individuals suffering from mechanical neck pain. Materials and Methods: We recruited 60 individuals (male: 31 and female: 29) who were suffering from mechanical neck pain. The participants were randomly distributed into Groups A and B. Patients of Group A underwent conventional physiotherapy treatment, whereas patients of Group B patients underwent thoracic spine manipulation and cranial base release. Baseline range of motion and pain were evaluated before starting the treatment, and postintervention measures were obtained after the weeks of intervention. Results: All participants completed 2 weeks of treatment. Group A had shown better outcome in all the parameters than Group B. We observed that the pain and cervical range of motions of Group B patients were statistically significantly different from those of Group A patients (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Thoracic spine manipulation in conjunction with cranial base release technique is more effective in the management of pain and cervical range of motion compared to the conventional physiotherapy treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸椎手法联合颅底释放技术对机械性颈痛患者疼痛和活动范围的影响
背景:疼痛起源于颈部,可辐射至肩部或颅底,常因焦虑、抑郁、软组织劳损、职业活动和不良姿势而加重。在本研究中,我们评估了胸椎操作和颅底释放技术在改善运动和减轻机械性颈痛患者疼痛方面的有效性。材料与方法:我们招募了60名患有机械性颈部疼痛的患者(男31名,女29名)。随机分为A组和B组,A组采用常规物理治疗,B组采用胸椎手法和颅底松解。在开始治疗前评估基线活动度和疼痛,并在干预数周后获得干预后的措施。结果:所有受试者均完成2周的治疗。A组患者的各项指标均优于B组,B组患者的疼痛程度、颈椎活动度与A组患者比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与传统的物理治疗相比,胸椎推拿联合颅底释放技术在治疗疼痛和颈椎活动范围方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biochemical role of zinc in dengue fever Concentration of chromium and nickel in serum of patients with orthopedic implant: An analysis Self-reliance in advanced diagnostic imaging for accessible, affordable, and quality health care in India A rare occurrence of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor in a young female Effects of muscle-specific exercises compared to existing interventions on insulin resistance among prediabetes population of South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1