The New Policing

P. Heymann
{"title":"The New Policing","authors":"P. Heymann","doi":"10.4135/9781446222270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores new forms of policing in New York, Chicago, and Boston. These cities developed new policing strategies that each involves a different combination of problem solving and new forms of “community policing”. The article explores whether these developments resulted in crime reduction and changes in belief in the efficacy of policing. The article concludes by considering the costs of the resulting increased security reduction in democratic control of policing and increased risk to civil liberties.","PeriodicalId":83028,"journal":{"name":"The Fordham urban law journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"102","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fordham urban law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

Abstract

This article explores new forms of policing in New York, Chicago, and Boston. These cities developed new policing strategies that each involves a different combination of problem solving and new forms of “community policing”. The article explores whether these developments resulted in crime reduction and changes in belief in the efficacy of policing. The article concludes by considering the costs of the resulting increased security reduction in democratic control of policing and increased risk to civil liberties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新警务
本文探讨了纽约、芝加哥和波士顿的新警务形式。这些城市制定了新的警务策略,每个城市都涉及解决问题和新形式的“社区警务”的不同组合。这篇文章探讨了这些发展是否导致了犯罪的减少和人们对警务效力的看法的变化。文章最后考虑了由此带来的安全增加的成本,减少了对警察的民主控制,增加了对公民自由的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intersectional Cohorts, Dis/ability, and Class Actions Overturning a Catch-22 in the Knick of Time: Knick v. Township of Scott and the Doctrine of Precedent Response: Children's Equality: Strategizing a New Deal for Children The Professionalization of Urban Accessibility Discovering that the Poor Pay More: Race Riots, Poverty, and the Rise of Consumer Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1