First Non-Directional Casing While Drilling CWD Run in ADNOC Onshore Saves Five Days Rig Time and Improves the Well Construction Process Minimizing Associated Risks with Circulation Losses and Wellbore Instability

R. Bethancourt, M. Sarhan, Felix Leonardo Castillo, Imad Al Hamlawi, L. Baptista, Sultan Saeed Al Mansoori, Ali Mubarak Al Braiki, Gennadys Ferrer, A. Cortes, M. Husien, Nader Jouzy, D. Herrera, P. Benny, Jeremy Paul Halma, Joey Roberie, R. Aubakirov
{"title":"First Non-Directional Casing While Drilling CWD Run in ADNOC Onshore Saves Five Days Rig Time and Improves the Well Construction Process Minimizing Associated Risks with Circulation Losses and Wellbore Instability","authors":"R. Bethancourt, M. Sarhan, Felix Leonardo Castillo, Imad Al Hamlawi, L. Baptista, Sultan Saeed Al Mansoori, Ali Mubarak Al Braiki, Gennadys Ferrer, A. Cortes, M. Husien, Nader Jouzy, D. Herrera, P. Benny, Jeremy Paul Halma, Joey Roberie, R. Aubakirov","doi":"10.2118/208024-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Loss of circulation while drilling the surface holes has become the main challenge in the Abu Dhabi Onshore developed fields. Typical consequences of losses are blind drilling and high instability of the wellbore that eventually led to hole collapse, drill string pack-offs and other associated well-integrity risks. Expensive operations including implementing aerated drilling technique, high water consumption and logistical constraints lead to difficulties reaching planned depth and running casing with added complexities of well integrity due to poor cement quality and bonding in the required isolation zones.\n Casing while drilling (CWD) is becoming a powerful method in mitigating both lost circulation as well as wellbore stability issues. This paper details the first 13 3/8″ × 16″ successful non-directional CWD trial accomplished in Abu Dhabi and the various advantages of the process.\n The Non-Directional CWD technology is used to drill vertical or tangent profiles with no directional drilling or logging (formation evaluation) requirements. The casing string is run with drillable body polycrystalline diamond cutters (PDC) bit and solid body centralizers are installed into the casing to achieve the required stand-off for cementing purpose. Some of the best practices applied to conventional drilling operations are not valid for CWD. The paper presents the methodology followed by the drilling engineers during the planning and preparation phases and presents a detailed description of the execution at the rig and the results of the evaluation including time savings, cement quality, rate of penetration, bottomhole assembly (BHA) directional tendency and losses comparison among others.The implementation of CWD saved the operator five days. The bit selection and fit-for-purpose bit design were critical factors for the success of the application. The interval was drilled (as planned) in one run through interbedded formations with a competitive rate of penetration (ROP). In this trial the interval consisted of 2,470ft with an average on-bottom ROP of 63.7 ft/hr, zero quality, health, safety and environmental (QHSE) incidents with enhanced safety for the rig crew.The technology eliminated the non-productive time (NPT) associated with tight spots, BHA pack-off, vibrations or stalls which it is an indication of good hole cleaning and optimum drilling parameters.Medium losses (10-15 BBL/hr) were cured due to the plastering and wellbore strengthening effect of CWD allowing drilling to resume with full returns.Well Verticality maintained with 0.3 degrees Inclination at section final depth.The drillable CWD bit was drilled out with a standard 12.25-in PDC bit in 1 hour as per the plan.","PeriodicalId":11069,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 16, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208024-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loss of circulation while drilling the surface holes has become the main challenge in the Abu Dhabi Onshore developed fields. Typical consequences of losses are blind drilling and high instability of the wellbore that eventually led to hole collapse, drill string pack-offs and other associated well-integrity risks. Expensive operations including implementing aerated drilling technique, high water consumption and logistical constraints lead to difficulties reaching planned depth and running casing with added complexities of well integrity due to poor cement quality and bonding in the required isolation zones. Casing while drilling (CWD) is becoming a powerful method in mitigating both lost circulation as well as wellbore stability issues. This paper details the first 13 3/8″ × 16″ successful non-directional CWD trial accomplished in Abu Dhabi and the various advantages of the process. The Non-Directional CWD technology is used to drill vertical or tangent profiles with no directional drilling or logging (formation evaluation) requirements. The casing string is run with drillable body polycrystalline diamond cutters (PDC) bit and solid body centralizers are installed into the casing to achieve the required stand-off for cementing purpose. Some of the best practices applied to conventional drilling operations are not valid for CWD. The paper presents the methodology followed by the drilling engineers during the planning and preparation phases and presents a detailed description of the execution at the rig and the results of the evaluation including time savings, cement quality, rate of penetration, bottomhole assembly (BHA) directional tendency and losses comparison among others.The implementation of CWD saved the operator five days. The bit selection and fit-for-purpose bit design were critical factors for the success of the application. The interval was drilled (as planned) in one run through interbedded formations with a competitive rate of penetration (ROP). In this trial the interval consisted of 2,470ft with an average on-bottom ROP of 63.7 ft/hr, zero quality, health, safety and environmental (QHSE) incidents with enhanced safety for the rig crew.The technology eliminated the non-productive time (NPT) associated with tight spots, BHA pack-off, vibrations or stalls which it is an indication of good hole cleaning and optimum drilling parameters.Medium losses (10-15 BBL/hr) were cured due to the plastering and wellbore strengthening effect of CWD allowing drilling to resume with full returns.Well Verticality maintained with 0.3 degrees Inclination at section final depth.The drillable CWD bit was drilled out with a standard 12.25-in PDC bit in 1 hour as per the plan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在ADNOC陆上进行的首个非定向套管随钻CWD作业节省了5天的钻机时间,改善了建井过程,最大限度地降低了循环漏失和井筒不稳定的相关风险
钻井时的循环漏失已经成为阿布扎比陆上开发油田面临的主要挑战。漏失的典型后果是盲目钻井和井筒高度不稳定,最终导致井眼坍塌、钻柱堵塞和其他相关的井完整性风险。实施充气钻井技术、高用水量和后勤限制等成本高昂的作业导致难以达到计划深度,下入套管以及由于所需隔离区域的水泥质量差和粘结性差而增加的井完整性复杂性。随钻下套管(CWD)正在成为缓解井漏和井筒稳定性问题的一种有力方法。本文详细介绍了在阿布扎比成功完成的第一次13 3/8″× 16″非定向CWD试验,以及该工艺的各种优势。非定向CWD技术用于垂直或切线剖面的钻井,无需定向钻井或测井(地层评价)要求。套管柱下入可钻体聚晶金刚石切削齿(PDC)钻头,并在套管中安装实体扶正器,以达到固井所需的隔离效果。一些适用于常规钻井作业的最佳实践并不适用于CWD。本文介绍了钻井工程师在计划和准备阶段所遵循的方法,并详细描述了钻机上的执行情况和评估结果,包括节省的时间、水泥质量、钻进速度、底部钻具组合(BHA)的定向趋势和损失比较等。CWD的实施为作业者节省了5天时间。钻头选择和适合用途的钻头设计是该应用成功的关键因素。这段井段按照计划在一趟钻中钻透了互层地层,具有竞争力的机械钻速(ROP)。在这次试验中,井段长度为2470英尺,平均底部ROP为63.7英尺/小时,零质量、健康、安全和环境(QHSE)事故,提高了钻井人员的安全性。该技术消除了与紧点、BHA封隔、振动或失速相关的非生产时间(NPT),这是良好的井眼清洁和最佳钻井参数的标志。由于CWD的抹灰和井眼强化效果,中等漏失(10-15桶/小时)得到了修复,使钻井能够完全恢复。井的垂直度在井段最终深度保持在0.3度。按照计划,可钻的CWD钻头使用标准12.25-in PDC钻头在1小时内钻出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Visualization of Oil Displacement by Foam in Porous Media Maximizing Condensate Recovery With Proven Cost Simulation for a Giant UAE Field: Base Study to Estimate Productivity between Horizontal and Vertical Wells Rationalization of Flares at Terminal Island A Geoengineering Approach to Maximum Reservoir Contact Wells Design: Case Study in a Carbonate Reservoir Under Water and Miscible Gas Injection Maximizing Brine Recovery After the Displacement of Reservoir Drill-in Fluids to Reduce Well Cost Via New, Alternate Technology In a Reservoir Offshore Abu Dhabi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1