Demonstrated Wavelength Portability of Raman Reference Data for Explosives and Chemical Detection

T. Johnson, Yin-Fong Su, Kristin H. Jarman, Brenda Kunkel, J. Birnbaum, A. Joly, E. Stephan, R. Tonkyn, R. Ewing, G. C. Dunham
{"title":"Demonstrated Wavelength Portability of Raman Reference Data for Explosives and Chemical Detection","authors":"T. Johnson, Yin-Fong Su, Kristin H. Jarman, Brenda Kunkel, J. Birnbaum, A. Joly, E. Stephan, R. Tonkyn, R. Ewing, G. C. Dunham","doi":"10.1155/2012/297056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Raman spectroscopy continues to evolve, questions arise as to the portability of Raman data: dispersive versus Fourier transform, wavelength calibration, intensity calibration, and in particular the frequency of the excitation laser. While concerns about fluorescence arise in the visible or ultraviolet, most modern (portable) systems use near-infrared excitation lasers, and many of these are relatively close in wavelength. We have investigated the possibility of porting reference data sets from one NIR wavelength system to another: We have constructed a reference library consisting of 145 spectra, including 20 explosives, as well as sundry other compounds and materials using a 1064 nm spectrometer. These data were used as a reference library to evaluate the same 145 compounds whose experimental spectra were recorded using a second 785 nm spectrometer. In 128 cases of 145 (or 88.3% including 20/20 for the explosives), the compounds were correctly identified with a mean “hit score” of 954 of 1000. Adding in criteria for when to declare a correct match versus when to declare uncertainty, the approach was able to correctly categorize 134 out of 145 spectra, giving a 92.4% accuracy. For the few that were incorrectly identified, either the matched spectra were spectroscopically similar to the target or the 785 nm signal was degraded due to fluorescence. The results indicate that imported data recorded at a different NIR wavelength can be successfully used as reference libraries, but key issues must be addressed: the reference data must be of equal or higher resolution than the resolution of the current sensor, the systems require rigorous wavelength calibration, and wavelength-dependent intensity response should be accounted for in the different systems.","PeriodicalId":14329,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spectroscopy","volume":"31 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/297056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

As Raman spectroscopy continues to evolve, questions arise as to the portability of Raman data: dispersive versus Fourier transform, wavelength calibration, intensity calibration, and in particular the frequency of the excitation laser. While concerns about fluorescence arise in the visible or ultraviolet, most modern (portable) systems use near-infrared excitation lasers, and many of these are relatively close in wavelength. We have investigated the possibility of porting reference data sets from one NIR wavelength system to another: We have constructed a reference library consisting of 145 spectra, including 20 explosives, as well as sundry other compounds and materials using a 1064 nm spectrometer. These data were used as a reference library to evaluate the same 145 compounds whose experimental spectra were recorded using a second 785 nm spectrometer. In 128 cases of 145 (or 88.3% including 20/20 for the explosives), the compounds were correctly identified with a mean “hit score” of 954 of 1000. Adding in criteria for when to declare a correct match versus when to declare uncertainty, the approach was able to correctly categorize 134 out of 145 spectra, giving a 92.4% accuracy. For the few that were incorrectly identified, either the matched spectra were spectroscopically similar to the target or the 785 nm signal was degraded due to fluorescence. The results indicate that imported data recorded at a different NIR wavelength can be successfully used as reference libraries, but key issues must be addressed: the reference data must be of equal or higher resolution than the resolution of the current sensor, the systems require rigorous wavelength calibration, and wavelength-dependent intensity response should be accounted for in the different systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爆炸物和化学检测拉曼参考数据的波长可移植性
随着拉曼光谱的不断发展,拉曼数据的可移植性问题出现了:色散与傅里叶变换,波长校准,强度校准,特别是激发激光的频率。虽然对可见光或紫外线中荧光的担忧,但大多数现代(便携式)系统使用近红外激发激光器,其中许多波长相对接近。我们已经研究了将参考数据集从一个近红外波长系统移植到另一个近红外波长系统的可能性:我们已经构建了一个由145个光谱组成的参考库,其中包括20个爆炸物,以及使用1064 nm光谱仪的各种其他化合物和材料。这些数据被用作参考库来评价同样145个化合物,这些化合物的实验光谱是用第二台785 nm光谱仪记录的。在128例145例(或88.3%,包括20/20的爆炸物)中,化合物被正确识别,平均“命中分数”为954 / 1000。加上何时声明正确匹配和何时声明不确定性的标准,该方法能够正确分类145个光谱中的134个,准确率为92.4%。对于少数被错误识别的,要么是匹配的光谱与目标光谱相似,要么是由于荧光导致785 nm信号降级。结果表明,在不同的近红外波长记录的导入数据可以成功地用作参考库,但必须解决关键问题:参考数据的分辨率必须等于或高于当前传感器的分辨率,系统需要严格的波长校准,并且在不同的系统中应考虑波长相关的强度响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and Characterization of Cobalt(III) and Copper(II) Complexes of 2-((E)-(6-Fluorobenzo[d]thiazol-2-ylimino) methyl)-4-chlorophenol: DNA Binding and Nuclease Studies—SOD and Antimicrobial Activities Application of Electrochemical Techniques on Study of Effect of Nano-ZnO in Conductive Polyaniline Containing Zinc-Rich Primer New Ni-Anthracene Complex for Selective and Sensitive Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol Application of Autofluorescence for Analysis of Medicinal Plants Fourier Spectroscopy: A Bayesian Way
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1