Title IX in its Third Decade: The Commission on Opportunity in Athletics

E. Staurowsky
{"title":"Title IX in its Third Decade: The Commission on Opportunity in Athletics","authors":"E. Staurowsky","doi":"10.1080/1473098042000275783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its passage in 1972, Title IX of the Education Amendments (44 Fed. Reg. at 71413) has, at times, provoked intense public interest and scrutiny when applied to federally funded, school-sponsored athletic programmes in the United States. In the year 2002, which marked the thirtieth anniversary of Title IX, the level and pace of the national debate on equity issues in athletics was again quite high. Within a contentious climate created by men’s sports advocates alleging that Title IX had been used to curtail or deny boys and young men equitable access to athletics, President George W. Bush charged the US Department of Education to appoint a commission to revisit longstanding and well-established enforcement guidelines, subjecting them to mass public comment and speculation. The purpose of this article is to examine the impact the appointment of the Commission on Opportunity on Athletics had on the national dialogue surrounding Title IX and its application to athletic programmes. The article concludes with an analysis of the political agenda behind the Commission’s work which was revealed in the tone and tenor of the Commission’s process and the final action taken by the Department of Education after the report of the Commission was issued.","PeriodicalId":36418,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"70-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Entertainment Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1473098042000275783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Since its passage in 1972, Title IX of the Education Amendments (44 Fed. Reg. at 71413) has, at times, provoked intense public interest and scrutiny when applied to federally funded, school-sponsored athletic programmes in the United States. In the year 2002, which marked the thirtieth anniversary of Title IX, the level and pace of the national debate on equity issues in athletics was again quite high. Within a contentious climate created by men’s sports advocates alleging that Title IX had been used to curtail or deny boys and young men equitable access to athletics, President George W. Bush charged the US Department of Education to appoint a commission to revisit longstanding and well-established enforcement guidelines, subjecting them to mass public comment and speculation. The purpose of this article is to examine the impact the appointment of the Commission on Opportunity on Athletics had on the national dialogue surrounding Title IX and its application to athletic programmes. The article concludes with an analysis of the political agenda behind the Commission’s work which was revealed in the tone and tenor of the Commission’s process and the final action taken by the Department of Education after the report of the Commission was issued.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第九章的第三个十年:体育机会委员会
自1972年通过以来,《教育修正案》第九条(44联邦法规)。(第71413条)在适用于美国联邦政府资助、学校赞助的体育项目时,有时会引起强烈的公众兴趣和审查。2002年是《教育法修正案第九条》颁布30周年,全国范围内关于体育公平问题的辩论的水平和速度再次相当高。在男子体育倡导者声称第九条被用来限制或剥夺男孩和年轻男性公平参加体育运动的机会所造成的争议气氛中,乔治·w·布什(George W. Bush)总统责成美国教育部(Department of Education)任命一个委员会,重新审视长期以来建立良好的执行指南,并将其置于公众评论和猜测之中。本文的目的是研究任命体育机会委员会对围绕第九条及其在体育项目中的应用的全国对话的影响。文章最后分析了委员会工作背后的政治议程,这在委员会进程的基调和基调以及教育部在委员会报告发表后所采取的最后行动中得到了揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and evolving issues under US copyright and patent law EULAs: Flexible tools of governance or instruments of authoritarianism? Are streaming rights the new broadcasting rights of the 21st century? A comparative review on the specific case of esport competitions Mr. Feige, I don’t feel so good … Copyright ownership, creators’ rights, and the Marvel Cinematic Universe Dark clouds gather – The development of cloud gaming, and competition agencies’ efforts to enable it on mobile app stores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1