Towards a relational approach for understanding the multiplicity of sitting activities

IF 1.8 1区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1108/arch-01-2022-0002
A. A. Sharif
{"title":"Towards a relational approach for understanding the multiplicity of sitting activities","authors":"A. A. Sharif","doi":"10.1108/arch-01-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims at unpacking the multiplicity of the sitting activity in public spaces through the lens of actor-network theory. In line with previous urban research focussing on outdoor activities, such empirical investigation aims to show the importance of the physical aspects of spaces, including seating, in supporting sitting activities as a way of encouraging the use of public space.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts the overlap between actor–network theory and affordances. It utilises ethnographic research involving frequent users in Dahiyat Al Hussein Park in Amman-Jordan. Data were gathered on the different seat–user relations and the translated sitting activity networks.FindingsAnalysis demonstrates different cases of alignment, misalignment and realignment between what is intended and experienced, and where these relations are maintained, disrupted or changed. These findings reveal the multiplicity of sitting activities; this is significant for understanding how they are maintained.Originality/valueThe research suggests a new way of conceptualising the relationship between the physical environment and users and an approach for examining sitting activities. Some studies have applied actor–network theory and/or the concept of “affordance” by highlighting relations between the object and its user and how they create sitting activities. However, only few studies have problematised the multiplicity of sitting when considering seating uses.","PeriodicalId":51801,"journal":{"name":"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-01-2022-0002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims at unpacking the multiplicity of the sitting activity in public spaces through the lens of actor-network theory. In line with previous urban research focussing on outdoor activities, such empirical investigation aims to show the importance of the physical aspects of spaces, including seating, in supporting sitting activities as a way of encouraging the use of public space.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts the overlap between actor–network theory and affordances. It utilises ethnographic research involving frequent users in Dahiyat Al Hussein Park in Amman-Jordan. Data were gathered on the different seat–user relations and the translated sitting activity networks.FindingsAnalysis demonstrates different cases of alignment, misalignment and realignment between what is intended and experienced, and where these relations are maintained, disrupted or changed. These findings reveal the multiplicity of sitting activities; this is significant for understanding how they are maintained.Originality/valueThe research suggests a new way of conceptualising the relationship between the physical environment and users and an approach for examining sitting activities. Some studies have applied actor–network theory and/or the concept of “affordance” by highlighting relations between the object and its user and how they create sitting activities. However, only few studies have problematised the multiplicity of sitting when considering seating uses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以一种关系的方法来理解坐着活动的多样性
本研究旨在通过行动者网络理论的视角来揭示公共空间中坐着活动的多样性。与之前关注户外活动的城市研究一致,这种实证调查旨在展示空间的物理方面,包括座位,在支持静坐活动方面的重要性,作为鼓励使用公共空间的一种方式。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了行动者网络理论与功能支持理论的重叠。它利用了涉及安曼-约旦达希亚特侯赛因公园频繁使用者的人种学研究。数据收集了不同的座位-使用者关系和翻译的坐姿活动网络。发现分析显示了在预期和经验之间的校准、不校准和重新校准的不同情况,以及这些关系在哪里被维持、破坏或改变。这些发现揭示了久坐活动的多样性;这对于理解它们是如何维护的非常重要。独创性/价值该研究提出了一种概念化物理环境与使用者之间关系的新方法,以及一种检查坐着活动的方法。一些研究通过强调物体和使用者之间的关系以及他们如何创造静坐活动,应用了行动者网络理论和/或“功能”的概念。然而,在考虑座位的使用时,只有少数研究对坐姿的多样性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
35.50%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal of architecture, urban design and planning, and built environment studies. The journal aims at establishing a bridge between theory and practice in these fields. The journal acts as a platform that reports on the latest research findings for examining buildings and urban environments and debates innovative approaches for creating responsive environments. Archnet-IJAR is truly international and aims at strengthening ties between scholars, academics, and practitioners from the global north and the global south with contributors and readers reaching across the boundaries of cultures and geographies.
期刊最新文献
Leaving no one behind: unveiling gaps in inclusive architecture at the UIA World Congress of architects 2023 The cost of universal design for public buildings: exploring a realistic, context-dependent research approach How a high-modernism project in South Korea failed: Sewoon Sangga (1966–1972), the first experimental modern planning Enhancing children's social and cognitive development through play space design Toward smart sustainable cities: assessment of stakeholders' readiness for digital participatory planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1